Vulnerabilities exploitable today
359,428in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,665
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,608
Distribution · last window
- Critical2,486
- High11,110
- Medium7,054
- Low646
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2025-217065.5 MED10.8%
——3In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: pm: only set fullmesh for subflow endp
With the in-kernel path-manager, it is possible to change the 'fullmesh'
flag. The code in mptcp_pm_nl_fullmesh() expects to change it only on
'subflow' endpoints, to recreate more or less subflows using the linked
address.
Unfortunately, the set_flags() hook was a bit more permissive, and
allowed 'implicit' endpoints to get the 'fullmesh' flag while it is not
allowed before.
That's what syzbot found, triggering the following warning:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6499 at net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1496 __mark_subflow_endp_available net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1496 [inline]
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6499 at net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1496 mptcp_pm_nl_fullmesh net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1980 [inline]
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6499 at net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1496 mptcp_nl_set_flags net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:2003 [inline]
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6499 at net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1496 mptcp_pm_nl_set_flags+0x974/0xdc0 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:2064
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6499 Comm: syz.1.413 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00172-gd1bf27c4e176 #0
Hardware name: Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024
RIP: 0010:__mark_subflow_endp_available net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1496 [inline]
RIP: 0010:mptcp_pm_nl_fullmesh net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1980 [inline]
RIP: 0010:mptcp_nl_set_flags net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:2003 [inline]
RIP: 0010:mptcp_pm_nl_set_flags+0x974/0xdc0 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:2064
Code: 01 00 00 49 89 c5 e8 fb 45 e8 f5 e9 b8 fc ff ff e8 f1 45 e8 f5 4c 89 f7 be 03 00 00 00 e8 44 1d 0b f9 eb a0 e8 dd 45 e8 f5 90 <0f> 0b 90 e9 17 ff ff ff 89 d9 80 e1 07 38 c1 0f 8c c9 fc ff ff 48
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000d307240 EFLAGS: 00010293
RAX: ffffffff8bb72e03 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88807da88000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffffc9000d307430 R08: ffffffff8bb72cf0 R09: 1ffff1100b842a5e
R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed100b842a5f R12: ffff88801e2e5ac0
R13: ffff88805c214800 R14: ffff88805c2152e8 R15: 1ffff1100b842a5d
FS: 00005555619f6500(0000) GS:ffff8880b8600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000020002840 CR3: 00000000247e6000 CR4: 00000000003526f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
genl_family_rcv_msg_doit net/netlink/genetlink.c:1115 [inline]
genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:1195 [inline]
genl_rcv_msg+0xb14/0xec0 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1210
netlink_rcv_skb+0x1e3/0x430 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2542
genl_rcv+0x28/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1219
netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1321 [inline]
netlink_unicast+0x7f6/0x990 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1347
netlink_sendmsg+0x8e4/0xcb0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1891
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:711 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x221/0x270 net/socket.c:726
____sys_sendmsg+0x52a/0x7e0 net/socket.c:2583
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2637 [inline]
__sys_sendmsg+0x269/0x350 net/socket.c:2669
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f5fe8785d29
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fff571f5558 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f5fe8975fa0 RCX: 00007f5fe8785d29
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000480 RDI: 0000000000000007
RBP: 00007f5fe8801b08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007f5fe8975fa0 R14: 00007f5fe8975fa0 R15: 000000
---truncated---31dCVE-2019-25711—10.8%
——3——CVE-2026-479665.4 MED10.8%
——3Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, 2026.04 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed.23dCVE-2026-479445.4 MED10.8%
——3Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, 2026.04 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed.23dCVE-2026-6649—10.8%
——3——CVE-2026-141164.3 MED10.8%
——3Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)43dCVE-2024-37306—10.8%
——3——CVE-2026-155076.3 MED10.8%
——3A vulnerability was detected in coollabsio Coolify up to 4.1.1. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /app/Policies/ of the component Policy Handler. Performing a manipulation results in missing authorization. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used.32dCVE-2023-25949—10.8%
——3——CVE-2025-13628—10.8%
——3——CVE-2024-9979—10.8%
——3——CVE-2026-54706.3 MED10.8%
——3A security vulnerability has been detected in mixelpixx Google-Research-MCP 1e062d7bd887bfe5f6e582b6cc288bb897b35cf2/ca613b736ab787bc926932f59cddc69457185a83. This issue affects the function extractContent of the file src/services/content-extractor.service.ts of the component Model Context Protocol Handler. The manipulation of the argument URL leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. This product uses a rolling release model to deliver continuous updates. As a result, specific version information for affected or updated releases is not available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.21dCVE-2024-41836—10.8%
——3——CVE-2026-155016.3 MED10.8%
——3A security vulnerability has been detected in AstrBotDevs AstrBot up to 4.25.2. Affected by this issue is the function ToolsRoute.test_mcp_connection of the file astrbot/dashboard/routes/tools.py of the component MCP Test Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument mcp_server_config.url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.30dCVE-2022-50855—10.8%
——3——CVE-2025-61800—10.8%
——3——CVE-2025-13934—10.8%
——3——CVE-2026-479625.4 MED10.8%
——3Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, 2026.04 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed.23dCVE-2026-5181—10.8%
——3——CVE-2026-5654—10.8%
——3——CVE-2026-5655—10.8%
——3——CVE-2025-61799—10.8%
——3——CVE-2024-2382—10.8%
——3——CVE-2022-26942—10.8%
——3——CVE-2023-22305—10.8%
——3——CVE-2024-500667.8 HIG10.8%
——3In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/mremap: fix move_normal_pmd/retract_page_tables race
In mremap(), move_page_tables() looks at the type of the PMD entry and the
specified address range to figure out by which method the next chunk of
page table entries should be moved.
At that point, the mmap_lock is held in write mode, but no rmap locks are
held yet. For PMD entries that point to page tables and are fully covered
by the source address range, move_pgt_entry(NORMAL_PMD, ...) is called,
which first takes rmap locks, then does move_normal_pmd().
move_normal_pmd() takes the necessary page table locks at source and
destination, then moves an entire page table from the source to the
destination.
The problem is: The rmap locks, which protect against concurrent page
table removal by retract_page_tables() in the THP code, are only taken
after the PMD entry has been read and it has been decided how to move it.
So we can race as follows (with two processes that have mappings of the
same tmpfs file that is stored on a tmpfs mount with huge=advise); note
that process A accesses page tables through the MM while process B does it
through the file rmap:
process A process B
========= =========
mremap
mremap_to
move_vma
move_page_tables
get_old_pmd
alloc_new_pmd
*** PREEMPT ***
madvise(MADV_COLLAPSE)
do_madvise
madvise_walk_vmas
madvise_vma_behavior
madvise_collapse
hpage_collapse_scan_file
collapse_file
retract_page_tables
i_mmap_lock_read(mapping)
pmdp_collapse_flush
i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping)
move_pgt_entry(NORMAL_PMD, ...)
take_rmap_locks
move_normal_pmd
drop_rmap_locks
When this happens, move_normal_pmd() can end up creating bogus PMD entries
in the line `pmd_populate(mm, new_pmd, pmd_pgtable(pmd))`. The effect
depends on arch-specific and machine-specific details; on x86, you can end
up with physical page 0 mapped as a page table, which is likely
exploitable for user->kernel privilege escalation.
Fix the race by letting process B recheck that the PMD still points to a
page table after the rmap locks have been taken. Otherwise, we bail and
let the caller fall back to the PTE-level copying path, which will then
bail immediately at the pmd_none() check.
Bug reachability: Reaching this bug requires that you can create
shmem/file THP mappings - anonymous THP uses different code that doesn't
zap stuff under rmap locks. File THP is gated on an experimental config
flag (CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS), so on normal distro kernels you need
shmem THP to hit this bug. As far as I know, getting shmem THP normally
requires that you can mount your own tmpfs with the right mount flags,
which would require creating your own user+mount namespace; though I don't
know if some distros maybe enable shmem THP by default or something like
that.
Bug impact: This issue can likely be used for user->kernel privilege
escalation when it is reachable.10dCVE-2025-139094.3 MED10.8%
——3The system accepts authentication requests without sufficient validation to enforce tenant isolation when using Email OTP, SMS OTP, or Magic Link as first-factor authenticators. This failure to adequately separate user data between tenants can lead to the exposure of personally identifiable information.
Successful exploitation allows an attacker to disclose personally identifiable information of users in different tenants, resulting in privacy violations and potential regulatory non-compliance. This may include unauthorized access to user details such as mobile numbers.4dCVE-2025-217055.5 MED10.8%
——3In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: handle fastopen disconnect correctly
Syzbot was able to trigger a data stream corruption:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 9846 at net/mptcp/protocol.c:1024 __mptcp_clean_una+0xddb/0xff0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1024
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9846 Comm: syz-executor351 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-syzkaller-00059-g00a5acdbf398 #0
Hardware name: Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/25/2024
RIP: 0010:__mptcp_clean_una+0xddb/0xff0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1024
Code: fa ff ff 48 8b 4c 24 18 80 e1 07 fe c1 38 c1 0f 8c 8e fa ff ff 48 8b 7c 24 18 e8 e0 db 54 f6 e9 7f fa ff ff e8 e6 80 ee f5 90 <0f> 0b 90 4c 8b 6c 24 40 4d 89 f4 e9 04 f5 ff ff 44 89 f1 80 e1 07
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000c0cf400 EFLAGS: 00010293
RAX: ffffffff8bb0dd5a RBX: ffff888033f5d230 RCX: ffff888059ce8000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffffc9000c0cf518 R08: ffffffff8bb0d1dd R09: 1ffff110170c8928
R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed10170c8929 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: ffff888033f5d220 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff8880592b8000
FS: 00007f6e866496c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b8600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f6e86f491a0 CR3: 00000000310e6000 CR4: 00000000003526f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__mptcp_clean_una_wakeup+0x7f/0x2d0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1074
mptcp_release_cb+0x7cb/0xb30 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3493
release_sock+0x1aa/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3640
inet_wait_for_connect net/ipv4/af_inet.c:609 [inline]
__inet_stream_connect+0x8bd/0xf30 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:703
mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x2a2/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1755
mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1830
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:711 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:726
____sys_sendmsg+0x52a/0x7e0 net/socket.c:2583
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2637 [inline]
__sys_sendmsg+0x269/0x350 net/socket.c:2669
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f6e86ebfe69
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 b1 1f 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f6e86649168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f6e86f491b8 RCX: 00007f6e86ebfe69
RDX: 0000000030004001 RSI: 0000000020000080 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007f6e86f491b0 R08: 00007f6e866496c0 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f6e86f491bc
R13: 000000000000006e R14: 00007ffe445d9420 R15: 00007ffe445d9508
</TASK>
The root cause is the bad handling of disconnect() generated internally
by the MPTCP protocol in case of connect FASTOPEN errors.
Address the issue increasing the socket disconnect counter even on such
a case, to allow other threads waiting on the same socket lock to
properly error out.31dCVE-2026-479365.4 MED10.8%
——3Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, 2026.04 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed.23dCVE-2022-49099—10.8%
——3——CVE-2026-483045.4 MED10.8%
——3Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, 2026.04 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed.23dCVE-2026-5653—10.8%
——3——CVE-2025-20612—10.8%
——3——CVE-2026-483015.4 MED10.8%
——3Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, 2026.04 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed.23dCVE-2021-44170—10.8%
——3——CVE-2026-155106.3 MED10.8%
——3A vulnerability was found in Leantime up to 3.8.0. Affected is the function Setting::saveSetting of the component API. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.32dCVE-2022-50367—10.8%
——3——CVE-2024-40831—10.8%
——3——CVE-2026-479575.4 MED10.8%
——3Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, 2026.04 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed.23dCVE-2026-3683—10.8%
——3——