Vulnerabilities exploitable today
358,897in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,665
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,607
Distribution · last window
- Critical2,708
- High11,665
- Medium7,438
- Low683
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-554724.3 MED9.7%
——3Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. Prior to 8.6.2, when Full Multiple Companies Support and scope_locations_fmcs are enabled, the API location creation endpoint detects an invalid parent-child company mismatch but does not return immediately, allowing creation of a child location under a parent location from a different company. This issue is fixed in version 8.6.2.30dCVE-2023-36642—9.7%
——3——CVE-2026-25407—9.7%
——3——CVE-2025-40570—9.7%
——3——CVE-2024-23515—9.7%
——3——CVE-2025-31814—9.7%
——3——CVE-2026-108606.5 MED9.7%
——3A logic error in the MISP CRUD component delete handler allowed validation failures to be bypassed when requests used the HTTP DELETE method. Due to missing parentheses in the delete condition, the expression was evaluated as ($validationError === null && POST) || DELETE, meaning a DELETE request could proceed even when the delete validation callback had rejected the operation. An authenticated attacker with access to an affected delete endpoint could abuse this flaw to delete records that should have been protected by application-level validation or authorization checks.21dCVE-2026-143064.3 MED9.7%
——3The Tutor LMS WordPress plugin before 3.9.14 does not properly verify enrollment when restricting access to protected course content, allowing authenticated users with subscriber-level access and above who are enrolled in at least one course to view paid lesson, quiz, and assignment content belonging to other courses.5dCVE-2026-27816—9.7%
——3——CVE-2025-30816—9.7%
——3——CVE-2026-30964—9.7%
——3——CVE-2026-25419—9.7%
——3——CVE-2026-394764.3 MED9.7%
——3Missing Authorization vulnerability in Syed Balkhi User Feedback userfeedback-lite allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects User Feedback: from n/a through <= 1.10.1.19dCVE-2025-30549—9.7%
——3——CVE-2024-31389—9.7%
——3——CVE-2026-9591—9.7%
——3——CVE-2026-28219—9.7%
——3——CVE-2024-56740—9.7%
——3——CVE-2025-14371—9.7%
——3——CVE-2026-24939—9.7%
——3——CVE-2025-30811—9.7%
——3——CVE-2026-24541—9.7%
——3——CVE-2022-50723—9.7%
——3——CVE-2024-409537.9 HIG9.6%
——3In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: Fix a data race on last_boosted_vcpu in kvm_vcpu_on_spin()
Use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() to access kvm->last_boosted_vcpu to ensure the
loads and stores are atomic. In the extremely unlikely scenario the
compiler tears the stores, it's theoretically possible for KVM to attempt
to get a vCPU using an out-of-bounds index, e.g. if the write is split
into multiple 8-bit stores, and is paired with a 32-bit load on a VM with
257 vCPUs:
CPU0 CPU1
last_boosted_vcpu = 0xff;
(last_boosted_vcpu = 0x100)
last_boosted_vcpu[15:8] = 0x01;
i = (last_boosted_vcpu = 0x1ff)
last_boosted_vcpu[7:0] = 0x00;
vcpu = kvm->vcpu_array[0x1ff];
As detected by KCSAN:
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in kvm_vcpu_on_spin [kvm] / kvm_vcpu_on_spin [kvm]
write to 0xffffc90025a92344 of 4 bytes by task 4340 on cpu 16:
kvm_vcpu_on_spin (arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:4112) kvm
handle_pause (arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:5929) kvm_intel
vmx_handle_exit (arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:?
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:6606) kvm_intel
vcpu_run (arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11107 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11211) kvm
kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run (arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:?) kvm
kvm_vcpu_ioctl (arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:?) kvm
__se_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:52 fs/ioctl.c:904 fs/ioctl.c:890)
__x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:890)
x64_sys_call (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:33)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:?)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
read to 0xffffc90025a92344 of 4 bytes by task 4342 on cpu 4:
kvm_vcpu_on_spin (arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:4069) kvm
handle_pause (arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:5929) kvm_intel
vmx_handle_exit (arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:?
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:6606) kvm_intel
vcpu_run (arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11107 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:11211) kvm
kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run (arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:?) kvm
kvm_vcpu_ioctl (arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:?) kvm
__se_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:52 fs/ioctl.c:904 fs/ioctl.c:890)
__x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:890)
x64_sys_call (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:33)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:?)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
value changed: 0x00000012 -> 0x000000009dCVE-2025-50050—9.6%
——3——CVE-2025-31245—9.6%
——3——CVE-2026-161224.3 MED9.6%
——3A security flaw has been discovered in nextlevelbuilder GoClaw up to 3.13.2. Affected by this vulnerability is the function extractBin/RequestApproval/matchesAllowlist of the file internal/tools/exec_approval.go. The manipulation results in incorrect authorization. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.23dCVE-2022-49536—9.6%
——3——CVE-2026-573487.2 HIG9.6%
——3Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Paid Member Subscriptions <= 3.0.4 versions.41dCVE-2025-43954—9.6%
——3——CVE-2025-54045—9.6%
——3——CVE-2025-48073—9.6%
——3——CVE-2022-498987.8 HIG9.6%
——3In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix tree mod log mishandling of reallocated nodes
We have been seeing the following panic in production
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/tree-mod-log.c:677!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
RIP: 0010:tree_mod_log_rewind+0x1b4/0x200
RSP: 0000:ffffc9002c02f890 EFLAGS: 00010293
RAX: 0000000000000003 RBX: ffff8882b448c700 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000008000 RSI: 00000000000000a7 RDI: ffff88877d831c00
RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 000000000000009f R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000100c40 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: ffff8886c26d6a00 R14: ffff88829f5424f8 R15: ffff88877d831a00
FS: 00007fee1d80c780(0000) GS:ffff8890400c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fee1963a020 CR3: 0000000434f33002 CR4: 00000000007706e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
btrfs_get_old_root+0x12b/0x420
btrfs_search_old_slot+0x64/0x2f0
? tree_mod_log_oldest_root+0x3d/0xf0
resolve_indirect_ref+0xfd/0x660
? ulist_alloc+0x31/0x60
? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x114/0x2c0
find_parent_nodes+0x97a/0x17e0
? ulist_alloc+0x30/0x60
btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x97/0x150
iterate_extent_inodes+0x154/0x370
? btrfs_search_path_in_tree+0x240/0x240
iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x98/0xd0
? btrfs_search_path_in_tree+0x240/0x240
btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino+0xd9/0x180
btrfs_ioctl+0xe2/0x2ec0
? __mod_memcg_lruvec_state+0x3d/0x280
? do_sys_openat2+0x6d/0x140
? kretprobe_dispatcher+0x47/0x70
? kretprobe_rethook_handler+0x38/0x50
? rethook_trampoline_handler+0x82/0x140
? arch_rethook_trampoline_callback+0x3b/0x50
? kmem_cache_free+0xfb/0x270
? do_sys_openat2+0xd5/0x140
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x71/0xb0
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x40
Which is this code in tree_mod_log_rewind()
switch (tm->op) {
case BTRFS_MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING:
BUG_ON(tm->slot < n);
This occurs because we replay the nodes in order that they happened, and
when we do a REPLACE we will log a REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING for every slot,
starting at 0. 'n' here is the number of items in this block, which in
this case was 1, but we had 2 REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING operations.
The actual root cause of this was that we were replaying operations for
a block that shouldn't have been replayed. Consider the following
sequence of events
1. We have an already modified root, and we do a btrfs_get_tree_mod_seq().
2. We begin removing items from this root, triggering KEY_REPLACE for
it's child slots.
3. We remove one of the 2 children this root node points to, thus triggering
the root node promotion of the remaining child, and freeing this node.
4. We modify a new root, and re-allocate the above node to the root node of
this other root.
The tree mod log looks something like this
logical 0 op KEY_REPLACE (slot 1) seq 2
logical 0 op KEY_REMOVE (slot 1) seq 3
logical 0 op KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING (slot 0) seq 4
logical 4096 op LOG_ROOT_REPLACE (old logical 0) seq 5
logical 8192 op KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING (slot 1) seq 6
logical 8192 op KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING (slot 0) seq 7
logical 0 op LOG_ROOT_REPLACE (old logical 8192) seq 8
>From here the bug is triggered by the following steps
1. Call btrfs_get_old_root() on the new_root.
2. We call tree_mod_log_oldest_root(btrfs_root_node(new_root)), which is
currently logical 0.
3. tree_mod_log_oldest_root() calls tree_mod_log_search_oldest(), which
gives us the KEY_REPLACE seq 2, and since that's not a
LOG_ROOT_REPLACE we incorrectly believe that we don't have an old
root, because we expect that the most recent change should be a
LOG_ROOT_REPLACE.
4. Back in tree_mod_log_oldest_root() we don't have a LOG_ROOT_REPLACE,
so we don't set old_root, we simply use our e
---truncated---9dCVE-2025-50038—9.6%
——3——CVE-2022-50643—9.6%
——3——CVE-2024-33681—9.6%
——3——CVE-2026-625276.3 MED9.6%
——3Vulnerability in the Oracle Learning Management product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Import And Export). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Learning Management. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Learning Management accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Learning Management accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Learning Management. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.3 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L).20dCVE-2026-3991—9.6%
——3——CVE-2023-33770—9.6%
——3——CVE-2026-66578.8 HIG9.6%
——3A vulnerability in jupyter-server versions 1.12.0 through 2.17.0 allows an attacker to bypass CORS origin validation when the `allow_origin_pat` configuration is used. The issue arises from the use of `re.match()` for validating the `Origin` header, which only anchors at the start of the string. This allows attacker-controlled domains such as `trusted.example.com.evil.com` to pass validation against patterns intended to match `trusted.example.com`. The vulnerability affects multiple locations in the codebase, including CORS headers, WebSocket connections, referer validation, and login redirects, potentially enabling phishing attacks, arbitrary code execution, and unauthorized access to sensitive API responses.22d