Vulnerabilities exploitable today
356,923in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,662
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,605
Distribution · last window
- Critical2,543
- High10,564
- Medium6,729
- Low670
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2025-25175—9.2%
——3——CVE-2024-47975—9.2%
——3——CVE-2021-1109—9.2%
——3——CVE-2024-10480—9.2%
——3——CVE-2024-50234—9.2%
——3——CVE-2026-5362—9.2%
——3——CVE-2026-93034.3 MED9.2%
——3A vulnerability was identified in calcom cal.diy up to 4.9.4. Impacted is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.18dCVE-2023-39283—9.2%
——3——CVE-2026-389356.1 MED9.2%
——3A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in diskover-community <= 2.3.5 in public/view.php via the doctype parameter36dCVE-2025-11975—9.2%
——3——CVE-2023-54362—9.2%
——3——CVE-2026-1164—9.2%
——3——CVE-2024-10495—9.2%
——3——CVE-2024-10494—9.2%
——3——CVE-2026-302526.1 MED9.2%
——3Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.17dCVE-2026-493328.5 HIG9.2%
——3A flaw was found in openshift/oauth-proxy. The proxy sets authenticated identity headers using only dash-variant keys (X-Forwarded-User) but does not strip underscore-variant keys (X_Forwarded_User) from incoming requests. WSGI and PHP frameworks normalize both variants to the same variable, allowing an authenticated low-privilege user to smuggle a forged identity that may override the legitimate authenticated identity in the upstream application.13dCVE-2026-555247.5 HIG9.2%
——3PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. In versions prior to 1.6.58, the web_crawl tool performs its SSRF check only on the initially supplied URL, allowing the protection to be bypassed so the tool connects to attacker-chosen internal destinations. The check resolves the hostname once with socket.gethostbyname and rejects private/loopback/link-local results, but then passes the URL to a fetcher using httpx.Client(follow_redirects=True) (or urllib.request.urlopen when httpx is absent, which also follows redirects) that re-resolves the hostname at connect time with no further validation. This validate-here/fetch-there gap is exploitable through both HTTP redirects and DNS rebinding. If an attacker can influence URLs passed to web_crawl(), directly or through an agent/tool workflow, they can cause the PraisonAI host to fetch loopback, private-network, or cloud metadata endpoints reachable from that host, with the response body returned in the web_crawl() result. This issue has been fixed in version 1.6.58.4dCVE-2026-352176.5 MED9.2%
——3NanoMQ contains a protocol-semantics flaw in its MQTT v5 `SUBSCRIBE` handling: if a subscription entry is missing the final 1-byte `Subscription Options` field, the broker may still accept the malformed packet and install the subscription into internal broker state. Under a specific packet-length construction, the same parser flaw also causes a 1-byte out-of-bounds read that crosses the real heap allocation boundary and is detected by ASAN as a `heap-buffer-overflow`.
If the consumed byte happens to look acceptable, NanoMQ may continue and append the malformed subscription entry into its internal `subinfol` state. In that case, a `SUBSCRIBE` packet that should be rejected by MQTT rules is instead treated as a successful subscription. Whether ASAN reports the bug does not depend on MQTT's logical `remain` boundary; it depends on whether the read crosses the real heap allocation boundary of the underlying message buffer. In other words, these are not two unrelated issues. They are two manifestations of the same parsing defect: by default, it appears as a semantic vulnerability, and under suitable input conditions, it also becomes a verifiable out-of-bounds read vulnerability.18dCVE-2026-481925.4 MED9.2%
——3A vulnerability has been identified in Mendix Studio Pro 10.11 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.12 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.13 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.14 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.15 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.16 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.17 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.18 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.19 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.20 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.21 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.22 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.23 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.24 (All versions < V10.24.21), Mendix Studio Pro 11.0 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.1 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.10 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.11 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.2 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.3 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.4 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.5 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.6 (All versions < V11.6.7), Mendix Studio Pro 11.7 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.8 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.9 (All versions). Affected versions of Mendix Studio Pro do not properly validate or sanitize project files processed during the build pipeline.
This could allow an attacker who tricks a user into opening and running a specially crafted malicious project locally on their system to execute arbitrary code in the context of that user.39dCVE-2025-9029—9.2%
——3——CVE-2023-53714—9.2%
——3——CVE-2026-25634—9.2%
——3——CVE-2022-2225—9.2%
——3——CVE-2026-5332—9.2%
——3——CVE-2026-346187.8 HIG9.2%
——3Illustrator versions 30.2, 29.8.5 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.17dCVE-2025-41351—9.2%
——3——CVE-2025-55716—9.2%
——3——CVE-2023-7065—9.2%
——3——CVE-2024-2105—9.2%
——3——CVE-2025-4677—9.2%
——3——CVE-2026-2726—9.2%
——3——CVE-2026-1542—9.2%
——3——CVE-2026-138084.6 MED9.2%
——3Insufficient data validation in Chrome for iOS in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a local attacker to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via physical access to the device. (Chromium security severity: High)40dCVE-2026-0687—9.2%
——3——CVE-2024-20920—9.2%
——3——CVE-2024-43819—9.2%
——3——CVE-2025-65000—9.2%
——3——CVE-2026-33402—9.2%
——3——CVE-2025-54598—9.2%
——3——CVE-2024-53775—9.2%
——3——