PULSE
LIVE9signals / 24h
FEED
ransomshinyhunters reclama a Ali** ********** · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Service d'usinage 9002 · CA · Manufacturingransomkrybit reclama a studiotibaldi.it · IT · Professional Servicesransompanzer reclama a Siam Oil Product · TH · Energy & Utilitiesransompanzer reclama a Daily Trust · NG · Otherransomqilin reclama a Impact Centre Chrétien · HT · Otherransomincransom reclama a Louisville Bar Association · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Clausing · DE · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a CLLS Co Ltd · SG · Not Foundransomstorm reclama a United Group of Companies · US · Otherransomstorm reclama a Sawyer Savings Bank · US · Financial Servicesransombravox reclama a MEDICOS · FR · Healthcareransomspacebears reclama a Hitech Distribuzione Informatica S.r.l. (HTDI) · IT · Technologyransomstorm reclama a Pioneer Bank · US · Financial Servicesransomshinyhunters reclama a Ali** ********** · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Service d'usinage 9002 · CA · Manufacturingransomkrybit reclama a studiotibaldi.it · IT · Professional Servicesransompanzer reclama a Siam Oil Product · TH · Energy & Utilitiesransompanzer reclama a Daily Trust · NG · Otherransomqilin reclama a Impact Centre Chrétien · HT · Otherransomincransom reclama a Louisville Bar Association · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Clausing · DE · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a CLLS Co Ltd · SG · Not Foundransomstorm reclama a United Group of Companies · US · Otherransomstorm reclama a Sawyer Savings Bank · US · Financial Servicesransombravox reclama a MEDICOS · FR · Healthcareransomspacebears reclama a Hitech Distribuzione Informatica S.r.l. (HTDI) · IT · Technologyransomstorm reclama a Pioneer Bank · US · Financial Services
CVE Watch356,708 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

356,708in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,662
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,605

Distribution · last window

  • Critical
    2,545
  • High
    10,617
  • Medium
    6,752
  • Low
    668
Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities325,961–326,000 · 356,708
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2022-509606.1 MED
8.5%
3WordPress International SMS for Contact Form 7 Integration version 1.2 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the page parameter of the admin settings interface. Attackers can inject malicious scripts through the page parameter in class-sms-log-display.php to execute arbitrary JavaScript in administrator browsers.16d
CVE-2025-40077
8.5%
3
CVE-2023-54137
8.5%
3
CVE-2025-40071
8.5%
3
CVE-2024-52479
8.5%
3
CVE-2025-48489
8.5%
3
CVE-2026-656168.8 HIG
8.5%
3Incorrect authorization validation in refresh token signature allows non-admin users to obtain a signed JFrog administrator token.10d
CVE-2023-54236
8.5%
3
CVE-2025-220227.8 HIG
8.5%
3In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: xhci: Apply the link chain quirk on NEC isoc endpoints Two clearly different specimens of NEC uPD720200 (one with start/stop bug, one without) were seen to cause IOMMU faults after some Missed Service Errors. Faulting address is immediately after a transfer ring segment and patched dynamic debug messages revealed that the MSE was received when waiting for a TD near the end of that segment: [ 1.041954] xhci_hcd: Miss service interval error for slot 1 ep 2 expected TD DMA ffa08fe0 [ 1.042120] xhci_hcd: AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT domain=0x0005 address=0xffa09000 flags=0x0000] [ 1.042146] xhci_hcd: AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT domain=0x0005 address=0xffa09040 flags=0x0000] It gets even funnier if the next page is a ring segment accessible to the HC. Below, it reports MSE in segment at ff1e8000, plows through a zero-filled page at ff1e9000 and starts reporting events for TRBs in page at ff1ea000 every microframe, instead of jumping to seg ff1e6000. [ 7.041671] xhci_hcd: Miss service interval error for slot 1 ep 2 expected TD DMA ff1e8fe0 [ 7.041999] xhci_hcd: Miss service interval error for slot 1 ep 2 expected TD DMA ff1e8fe0 [ 7.042011] xhci_hcd: WARN: buffer overrun event for slot 1 ep 2 on endpoint [ 7.042028] xhci_hcd: All TDs skipped for slot 1 ep 2. Clear skip flag. [ 7.042134] xhci_hcd: WARN: buffer overrun event for slot 1 ep 2 on endpoint [ 7.042138] xhci_hcd: ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not part of current TD ep_index 2 comp_code 31 [ 7.042144] xhci_hcd: Looking for event-dma 00000000ff1ea040 trb-start 00000000ff1e6820 trb-end 00000000ff1e6820 [ 7.042259] xhci_hcd: WARN: buffer overrun event for slot 1 ep 2 on endpoint [ 7.042262] xhci_hcd: ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not part of current TD ep_index 2 comp_code 31 [ 7.042266] xhci_hcd: Looking for event-dma 00000000ff1ea050 trb-start 00000000ff1e6820 trb-end 00000000ff1e6820 At some point completion events change from Isoch Buffer Overrun to Short Packet and the HC finally finds cycle bit mismatch in ff1ec000. [ 7.098130] xhci_hcd: ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not part of current TD ep_index 2 comp_code 13 [ 7.098132] xhci_hcd: Looking for event-dma 00000000ff1ecc50 trb-start 00000000ff1e6820 trb-end 00000000ff1e6820 [ 7.098254] xhci_hcd: ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not part of current TD ep_index 2 comp_code 13 [ 7.098256] xhci_hcd: Looking for event-dma 00000000ff1ecc60 trb-start 00000000ff1e6820 trb-end 00000000ff1e6820 [ 7.098379] xhci_hcd: Overrun event on slot 1 ep 2 It's possible that data from the isochronous device were written to random buffers of pending TDs on other endpoints (either IN or OUT), other devices or even other HCs in the same IOMMU domain. Lastly, an error from a different USB device on another HC. Was it caused by the above? I don't know, but it may have been. The disk was working without any other issues and generated PCIe traffic to starve the NEC of upstream BW and trigger those MSEs. The two HCs shared one x1 slot by means of a commercial "PCIe splitter" board. [ 7.162604] usb 10-2: reset SuperSpeed USB device number 3 using xhci_hcd [ 7.178990] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 UNKNOWN(0x2003) Result: hostbyte=0x07 driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s [ 7.179001] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 CDB: opcode=0x28 28 00 04 02 ae 00 00 02 00 00 [ 7.179004] I/O error, dev sdb, sector 67284480 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x80700 phys_seg 5 prio class 0 Fortunately, it appears that this ridiculous bug is avoided by setting the chain bit of Link TRBs on isochronous rings. Other ancient HCs are known which also expect the bit to be set and they ignore Link TRBs if it's not. Reportedly, 0.95 spec guaranteed that the bit is set. The bandwidth-starved NEC HC running a 32KB/uframe UVC endpoint reports tens of MSEs per second and runs into the bug within seconds. Chaining Link TRBs allows the same workload to run for many minutes, many times. No ne ---truncated---10d
CVE-2025-36119
8.5%
3
CVE-2025-59799
8.5%
3
CVE-2020-12491
8.5%
3
CVE-2025-38729
8.5%
3
CVE-2025-711905.5 MED
8.5%
3In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: fix device leak on probe Make sure to drop the reference taken when looking up the mailbox device during probe on probe failures and on driver unbind.26d
CVE-2026-465557.7 HIG
8.5%
3WhatsApp MCP Server is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for WhatsApp, enabling Claude to read and send WhatsApp messages. Prior to version 0.2.1, the `whatsapp-bridge` HTTP API listens on `127.0.0.1:8080` without authentication and without Host header validation, and the `/api/send` endpoint accepts an absolute `media_path` parameter without confining it to a safe directory. Combined, these issues allow any local process running as the same user as the bridge to send WhatsApp messages from the paired account without authorization; the same caller to read arbitrary files readable by the user (e.g. SSH private keys, browser session data, source code, dotfiles) and exfiltrate them as WhatsApp document attachments; and/or a remote attacker to trigger the same operations via DNS rebinding from a webpage the user visits, since no Host header validation is performed. In MCP environments, "local caller" extends beyond processes the user explicitly launched — sibling MCP servers, IDE extensions, and tool-triggered flows running in the user's session can act as the effective caller. This issue is fixed in whatsapp-mcp v0.2.1 and corresponding Docker images / release artifacts. Users should upgrade immediately. The fix introduces bearer token authentication on the bridge HTTP API (configured via environment variable, required on all requests, validated with constant-time comparison); host header allow-list validation to prevent DNS rebinding; and confinement of `media_path` to a configured directory, with rejection of absolute paths outside the root and path traversal sequences. This is a breaking change for clients of the bridge API. For users who cannot immediately upgrade: Stop the bridge, or block loopback access to port 8080, when the bridge is not actively in use; avoid running the bridge alongside untrusted MCP servers, browser extensions, or other untrusted local processes; avoid browsing untrusted sites while the bridge is running (DNS rebinding mitigation); and/or run the bridge under a dedicated user account or in a sandbox/container with no access to sensitive files.17d
CVE-2025-40062
8.5%
3
CVE-2025-59117
8.5%
3
CVE-2026-6401
8.5%
3
CVE-2024-42158
8.5%
3
CVE-2025-219657.8 HIG
8.5%
3In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched_ext: Validate prev_cpu in scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl() If a BPF scheduler provides an invalid CPU (outside the nr_cpu_ids range) as prev_cpu to scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl() it can cause a kernel crash. To prevent this, validate prev_cpu in scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl() and trigger an scx error if an invalid CPU is specified.10d
CVE-2025-52476
8.5%
3
CVE-2026-42058
8.5%
3
CVE-2025-6247
8.5%
3
CVE-2026-33403
8.5%
3
CVE-2026-7909
8.5%
3
CVE-2025-21968
8.5%
3
CVE-2025-67989
8.5%
3
CVE-2023-54122
8.5%
3
CVE-2026-0633
8.5%
3
CVE-2026-112706.5 MED
8.5%
3Inappropriate implementation in UI in Google Chrome on Android prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)17d
CVE-2019-10626
8.5%
3
CVE-2026-203128.8 HIG
8.5%
3As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in software hardening releases that address multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20312 are related to Cleartext storage of sensitive information issues that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-312.3d
CVE-2026-618632.9 LOW
8.5%
3ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 (and 6.x before 6.9.13-51) contains a memory leak in the TIFF encoder that occurs when a temporary file cannot be created, resulting in a small memory leak.24d
CVE-2024-42090
8.5%
3
CVE-2026-42430
8.5%
3
CVE-2026-27411
8.5%
3
CVE-2025-52475
8.5%
3
CVE-2025-59967
8.5%
3
CVE-2026-402907.8 HIG
8.5%
3OP-TEE is a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) designed as companion to a non-secure Linux kernel running on Arm; Cortex-A cores using the TrustZone technology. Starting in version 3.16.0 and prior to 4.11.0, a user-after-free (UAF) race condition exists in the shared memory teardown logic of FF-A within OP-TEE SPMC/SP flows. This only applies when OP-TEE is configured as an SPMC for S-EL0 SPs, that is, with `CFG_SECURE_PARTITION=y`. The function `sp_mem_remove()`, responsible for freeing entries in `smem->receivers` and `smem->regions`, fails to acquire the global `sp_mem_lock` before performing the `free()` operations. Concurrently, other code paths, such as `sp_mem_get_receiver()`, iterate over these same lists without holding a lock, or, like `sp_mem_is_shared()`, iterate while holding the lock but are not serialized against the unprotected `free()` in `sp_mem_remove()`. This creates a cross-thread race where a thread iterating the list can acquire a pointer to an entry (e.g., `struct sp_mem_map_region` or `struct sp_mem_receiver`), and then another thread calls `sp_mem_remove()`, freeing the object. When the first thread resumes and dereferences the pointer, it results in a Use-After-Free vulnerability. Version 4.11.0 fixes the issue.19d
CVE-2025-23577
8.5%
3