Vulnerabilities exploitable today
356,659in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,662
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,605
Distribution · last window
- Critical2,549
- High10,744
- Medium6,927
- Low695
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-5926—7.8%
——2——CVE-2019-25561—7.8%
——2——CVE-2025-65132—7.8%
——2——CVE-2022-49588—7.8%
——2——CVE-2021-46772—7.8%
——2——CVE-2021-47350—7.8%
——2——CVE-2026-133406.1 MED7.8%
——2The SVG Support WordPress plugin before 2.5.17 does not apply its SVG sanitisation to uploaded files using the .svgz extension, even though it registers and serves them as SVG, allowing a user permitted to upload SVGs (such as an Author once granted upload access) to store a script-bearing file that executes in the browser of anyone who later views it, including an administrator.5dCVE-2026-447676.1 MED7.8%
——2setThemeRoot() failed to enforce the sap-allowed-theme-origins allowlist. An attacker-controlled absolute cross-origin URL could be stored and used directly to construct a <link rel=stylesheet> element, even when no <meta name=sap-allowed-theme-origins> tag was present in the document. The same bypass was reachable via the ?sap-themeRoot URL parameter.Exploitation requires attacker-influenced input (e.g., a URL query parameter, tenant configuration, or user-supplied setting) to reach setThemeRoot(). A successful exploit allows an attacker to inject arbitrary CSS into the victim page, enabling:- UI redressing and clickjacking- Phishing overlays- Visual defacement- Limited data exfiltration via CSS attribute selectors targeting predictable DOM content25dCVE-2024-47661—7.8%
——2——CVE-2022-43662—7.8%
——2——CVE-2026-36521—7.8%
——2——CVE-2025-11826—7.8%
——2——CVE-2025-40221—7.8%
——2——CVE-2026-31351—7.8%
——2——CVE-2026-107706.1 MED7.8%
——2Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Anti-Spam by CleanTalk allows Reflected XSS. This issue affects Anti-Spam by CleanTalk versions: from 0.0.0 to 9.7.1.2dCVE-2025-11764—7.8%
——2——CVE-2025-12088—7.8%
——2——CVE-2026-100284.3 MED7.8%
——2A flaw was found in glib-networking. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by presenting a specially crafted certificate chain to an application that uses glib-networking with the GnuTLS backend enabled and performs certificate verification. This crafted chain, which contains circular issuer relationships, can cause an infinite loop during certificate verification. The unbounded traversal consumes excessive CPU resources, leading to a denial of service for the affected process or worker.18dCVE-2026-132346.1 MED7.8%
——2Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal AI (Artificial Intelligence) allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects AI (Artificial Intelligence) versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.2.17, from 1.3.0 to 1.3.8, from 1.4.0 to 1.4.3.2dCVE-2025-6060—7.8%
——2——CVE-2025-13135—7.8%
——2——CVE-2024-498667.8 HIG7.8%
——2In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tracing/timerlat: Fix a race during cpuhp processing
There is another found exception that the "timerlat/1" thread was
scheduled on CPU0, and lead to timer corruption finally:
```
ODEBUG: init active (active state 0) object: ffff888237c2e108 object type: hrtimer hint: timerlat_irq+0x0/0x220
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 426 at lib/debugobjects.c:518 debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 426 Comm: timerlat/1 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc7+ #45
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __warn+0x7c/0x110
? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0
? report_bug+0xf1/0x1d0
? prb_read_valid+0x17/0x20
? handle_bug+0x3f/0x70
? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60
? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0
? debug_print_object+0x7d/0xb0
? __pfx_timerlat_irq+0x10/0x10
__debug_object_init+0x110/0x150
hrtimer_init+0x1d/0x60
timerlat_main+0xab/0x2d0
? __pfx_timerlat_main+0x10/0x10
kthread+0xb7/0xe0
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x40
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
</TASK>
```
After tracing the scheduling event, it was discovered that the migration
of the "timerlat/1" thread was performed during thread creation. Further
analysis confirmed that it is because the CPU online processing for
osnoise is implemented through workers, which is asynchronous with the
offline processing. When the worker was scheduled to create a thread, the
CPU may has already been removed from the cpu_online_mask during the offline
process, resulting in the inability to select the right CPU:
T1 | T2
[CPUHP_ONLINE] | cpu_device_down()
osnoise_hotplug_workfn() |
| cpus_write_lock()
| takedown_cpu(1)
| cpus_write_unlock()
[CPUHP_OFFLINE] |
cpus_read_lock() |
start_kthread(1) |
cpus_read_unlock() |
To fix this, skip online processing if the CPU is already offline.4dCVE-2026-132316.1 MED7.8%
——2Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Advanced Content Feedback (aka admin_feedback) allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Advanced Content Feedback (aka admin_feedback) versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.8.0.2dCVE-2025-11801—7.8%
——2——CVE-2026-275056.1 MED7.8%
——2SVXportal version 2.5 and prior contain a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the user registration workflow (index.php submitting to admin/user_action.php). User-supplied fields such as Firstname, lastname, and email are stored in the backend database without adequate output encoding and are later rendered in the administrator interface (admin/users.php), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in an administrator's browser upon viewing the affected page.25dCVE-2026-0746—7.8%
——2——CVE-2026-23408—7.8%
——2——CVE-2018-25262—7.8%
——2——CVE-2022-26860—7.8%
——2——CVE-2025-11808—7.8%
——2——CVE-2025-12453—7.8%
——2——CVE-2025-8605—7.8%
——2——CVE-2025-14687—7.8%
——2——CVE-2025-40177—7.8%
——2——CVE-2024-23980—7.8%
——2——CVE-2026-141535.3 MED7.8%
——2Inappropriate implementation in Glic in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)38dCVE-2025-12715—7.8%
——2——CVE-2026-1924—7.8%
——2——CVE-2025-11800—7.8%
——2——CVE-2024-36028—7.8%
——2——