PULSE
LIVE15signals / 24h
FEED
ransomstorm reclama a United Group of Companies · US · Otherransomstorm reclama a Sawyer Savings Bank · US · Financial Servicesransombravox reclama a MEDICOS · FR · Healthcareransomspacebears reclama a Hitech Distribuzione Informatica S.r.l. (HTDI) · IT · Technologyransomstorm reclama a Pioneer Bank · US · Financial Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Hartfiel Automation · DE · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Astro Electroplating · US · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Filtronic · GB · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a EISNER ZT GMBH · AT · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a John C Saunders, CPA · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Nikan Awasisak Agency · CA · Not Foundransomqilin reclama a Depona · SE · Technologyransomclop reclama a CONTINENTAL.AERO · US · Transportationransomclop reclama a MINDRAY.COM · CN · Healthcareransomstorm reclama a United Group of Companies · US · Otherransomstorm reclama a Sawyer Savings Bank · US · Financial Servicesransombravox reclama a MEDICOS · FR · Healthcareransomspacebears reclama a Hitech Distribuzione Informatica S.r.l. (HTDI) · IT · Technologyransomstorm reclama a Pioneer Bank · US · Financial Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Hartfiel Automation · DE · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Astro Electroplating · US · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Filtronic · GB · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a EISNER ZT GMBH · AT · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a John C Saunders, CPA · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Nikan Awasisak Agency · CA · Not Foundransomqilin reclama a Depona · SE · Technologyransomclop reclama a CONTINENTAL.AERO · US · Transportationransomclop reclama a MINDRAY.COM · CN · Healthcare
CVE Watch356,659 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

356,659in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,662
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,605

Distribution · last window

  • Critical
    2,550
  • High
    10,749
  • Medium
    6,931
  • Low
    696
Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities328,481–328,520 · 356,659
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-63990
7.8%
2In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bonding: refuse to enslave CAN devices syzbot reported a kernel paging request crash in can_rx_unregister() inside net/can/af_can.c. The crash occurs because a virtual CAN device (vxcan) is being enslaved to a bonding master. During the enslavement process, the bonding driver mutates and modifies the network device states to fit an Ethernet-like aggregation model. However, CAN devices operate on a completely different Layer 2 architecture, relying on the CAN mid-layer private data structure (can_ml_priv) instead of standard Ethernet structures. Since bonding does not initialize or maintain these CAN structures, subsequent operations on the half-enslaved interface (such as closing associated sockets via isotp_release) lead to a null-pointer dereference when accessing the CAN receiver lists. Bonding CAN interfaces is architecturally invalid as CAN lacks MAC addresses, ARP capabilities, and standard Ethernet link-layer mechanisms. While generic loopback devices are blocked globally in net/core/dev.c, virtual CAN devices bypass this check because they do not carry the IFF_LOOPBACK flag, despite acting as local software-loopbacks. Fix this by explicitly blocking network devices of type ARPHRD_CAN from being enslaved at the very beginning of bond_enslave(). This prevents illegal state mutations, eliminates the resulting KASAN crashes, and avoids potential memory leaks from incomplete socket cleanups. As the CAN support has been added a long time after bonding the Fixes-tag points to the introduction of ARPHRD_CAN that would have needed a specific handling in bonding_main.c.9d
CVE-2024-46793
7.8%
2
CVE-2026-26225
7.8%
2
CVE-2025-53914
7.8%
2
CVE-2025-21649
7.8%
2
CVE-2026-493846.1 MED
7.8%
2In JetBrains PyCharm before 2025.3.4 stored XSS in Jupyter notebook Markdown cells was possible17d
CVE-2025-12823
7.8%
2
CVE-2021-27785
7.8%
2
CVE-2025-33217
7.8%
2
CVE-2024-26740
7.8%
2
CVE-2019-1809
7.8%
2
CVE-2025-4661
7.8%
2
CVE-2025-2515
7.8%
2
CVE-2026-33311
7.8%
2
CVE-2025-12376
7.8%
2
CVE-2026-23405
7.8%
2
CVE-2025-54222
7.8%
2
CVE-2025-8045
7.8%
2
CVE-2025-20076
7.8%
2
CVE-2024-13976
7.8%
2
CVE-2026-32112
7.8%
2
CVE-2026-25576
7.8%
2
CVE-2025-71244
7.8%
2
CVE-2026-221885.5 MED
7.8%
2The deploy-stub component in Panda3D versions up to and including 1.10.16 contains a denial of service vulnerability due to unbounded stack allocation. The deploy-stub executable allocates argv_copy and argv_copy2 using alloca() based directly on the attacker-controlled argc value without validation. Supplying a large number of command-line arguments can exhaust stack space and propagate uninitialized stack memory into Python interpreter initialization, resulting in a reliable crash and undefined behavior.25d
CVE-2024-38335
7.8%
2
CVE-2025-37824
7.8%
2
CVE-2024-24864
7.8%
2
CVE-2025-13939
7.8%
2
CVE-2026-55188
7.8%
2
CVE-2025-40152
7.8%
2
CVE-2026-140464.3 MED
7.8%
2Inappropriate implementation in CustomTabs in Google Chrome on Android prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to bypass same origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)38d
CVE-2022-49921
7.8%
2
CVE-2026-64482
7.8%
2In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: gus: check snd_ctl_new1() return value snd_ctl_new1() can return NULL when memory allocation fails. snd_gf1_pcm_volume_control() does not check the return value before dereferencing kctl->id.index, which can lead to a NULL pointer dereference. Add a NULL check after snd_ctl_new1() and return -ENOMEM if it fails.14d
CVE-2025-21978
7.8%
2
CVE-2021-47569
7.8%
2
CVE-2026-389727.8 HIG
7.8%
2Notepad3 through 6.25.822.1 contains a DLL search-order hijacking vulnerability in the About-dialog code path in src/Notepad3.c. The application calls LoadLibrary(L"MSFTEDIT.DLL") with a bare DLL name, which allows a local attacker to place a malicious MSFTEDIT.DLL in the application directory or another preferred DLL search location and achieve arbitrary code execution in the context of the user when the About dialog is opened.31d
CVE-2024-1446
7.8%
2
CVE-2026-4587
7.8%
2
CVE-2025-5275
7.8%
2
CVE-2025-64781
7.8%
2