Vulnerabilities exploitable today
355,262in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,657
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,602
Distribution · last window
- Critical2,740
- High11,055
- Medium7,344
- Low696
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-15305—7.1%
——2Users were able to upload files with arbitrary MIME types to forms using FileUpload or ImageUpload elements with allowedMimeTypes configured. The restriction was not enforced server-side because the MimeTypeValidator was registered during form building before concrete form definition properties were applied, resulting in the validator never being added to the processing pipeline. This issue affects TYPO3 CMS versions 14.2.0-14.3.4.20dCVE-2022-32266—7.1%
——2——CVE-2025-33043—7.1%
——2——CVE-2022-49630—7.1%
——2——CVE-2025-7057—7.1%
——2——CVE-2025-21990—7.1%
——2——CVE-2024-48047—7.1%
——2——CVE-2025-21987—7.1%
——2——CVE-2023-25522—7.1%
——2——CVE-2025-6383—7.1%
——2——CVE-2024-37573—7.1%
——2——CVE-2011-2169—7.1%
——2——CVE-2026-479527.8 HIG7.1%
——2Acrobat Reader versions 24.001.30365, 26.001.21651 and earlier are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.12dCVE-2017-14884—7.1%
——2——CVE-2025-21982—7.1%
——2——CVE-2026-394134.2 MED7.1%
——2LightRAG provides simple and fast retrieval-augmented generation. Prior to 1.4.14, the LightRAG API is vulnerable to a JWT algorithm confusion attack where an attacker can forge tokens by specifying 'alg': 'none' in the JWT header. Since the jwt.decode() call does not explicitly deny the 'none' algorithm, a crafted token without a signature will be accepted as valid, leading to unauthorized access. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.4.14.11dCVE-2025-41391—7.1%
——2——CVE-2025-3272—7.1%
——2——CVE-2025-6743—7.1%
——2——CVE-2025-21977—7.1%
——2——CVE-2024-36398—7.1%
——2——CVE-2025-38702—7.1%
——2——CVE-2022-499287.5 HIG7.1%
——2In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
SUNRPC: Fix null-ptr-deref when xps sysfs alloc failed
There is a null-ptr-deref when xps sysfs alloc failed:
BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x40/0xd0
Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000030 by task gssproxy/457
CPU: 5 PID: 457 Comm: gssproxy Not tainted 6.0.0-09040-g02357b27ee03 #9
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44
kasan_report+0xa3/0x120
sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x40/0xd0
rpc_sysfs_client_setup+0x161/0x1b0
rpc_new_client+0x3fc/0x6e0
rpc_create_xprt+0x71/0x220
rpc_create+0x1d4/0x350
gssp_rpc_create+0xc3/0x160
set_gssp_clnt+0xbc/0x140
write_gssp+0x116/0x1a0
proc_reg_write+0xd6/0x130
vfs_write+0x177/0x690
ksys_write+0xb9/0x150
do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
When the xprt_switch sysfs alloc failed, should not add xprt and
switch sysfs to it, otherwise, maybe null-ptr-deref; also initialize
the 'xps_sysfs' to NULL to avoid oops when destroy it.4hCVE-2025-7362—7.1%
——2——CVE-2026-6391—7.1%
——2——CVE-2025-377747.8 HIG7.1%
——2In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
slab: ensure slab->obj_exts is clear in a newly allocated slab page
ktest recently reported crashes while running several buffered io tests
with __alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook() at the top of the crash call stack.
The signature indicates an invalid address dereference with low bits of
slab->obj_exts being set. The bits were outside of the range used by
page_memcg_data_flags and objext_flags and hence were not masked out
by slab_obj_exts() when obtaining the pointer stored in slab->obj_exts.
The typical crash log looks like this:
00510 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000010
00510 Mem abort info:
00510 ESR = 0x0000000096000045
00510 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
00510 SET = 0, FnV = 0
00510 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
00510 FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault
00510 Data abort info:
00510 ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000045, ISS2 = 0x00000000
00510 CM = 0, WnR = 1, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
00510 GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
00510 user pgtable: 4k pages, 39-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000104175000
00510 [0000000000000010] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000, pud=0000000000000000
00510 Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000045 [#1] SMP
00510 Modules linked in:
00510 CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 7692 Comm: cat Not tainted 6.15.0-rc1-ktest-g189e17946605 #19327 NONE
00510 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
00510 pstate: 20001005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT +SSBS BTYPE=--)
00510 pc : __alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook+0xe0/0x190
00510 lr : __kmalloc_noprof+0x150/0x310
00510 sp : ffffff80c87df6c0
00510 x29: ffffff80c87df6c0 x28: 000000000013d1ff x27: 000000000013d200
00510 x26: ffffff80c87df9e0 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000001
00510 x23: ffffffc08041953c x22: 000000000000004c x21: ffffff80c0002180
00510 x20: fffffffec3120840 x19: ffffff80c4821000 x18: 0000000000000000
00510 x17: fffffffec3d02f00 x16: fffffffec3d02e00 x15: fffffffec3d00700
00510 x14: fffffffec3d00600 x13: 0000000000000200 x12: 0000000000000006
00510 x11: ffffffc080bb86c0 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : ffffffc080201e58
00510 x8 : ffffff80c4821060 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000055555556
00510 x5 : 0000000000000001 x4 : 0000000000000010 x3 : 0000000000000060
00510 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffffffc080f50cf8 x0 : ffffff80d801d000
00510 Call trace:
00510 __alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook+0xe0/0x190 (P)
00510 __kmalloc_noprof+0x150/0x310
00510 __bch2_folio_create+0x5c/0xf8
00510 bch2_folio_create+0x2c/0x40
00510 bch2_readahead+0xc0/0x460
00510 read_pages+0x7c/0x230
00510 page_cache_ra_order+0x244/0x3a8
00510 page_cache_async_ra+0x124/0x170
00510 filemap_readahead.isra.0+0x58/0xa0
00510 filemap_get_pages+0x454/0x7b0
00510 filemap_read+0xdc/0x418
00510 bch2_read_iter+0x100/0x1b0
00510 vfs_read+0x214/0x300
00510 ksys_read+0x6c/0x108
00510 __arm64_sys_read+0x20/0x30
00510 invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x54/0xe8
00510 do_el0_svc+0x44/0xc8
00510 el0_svc+0x18/0x58
00510 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x104/0x130
00510 el0t_64_sync+0x154/0x158
00510 Code: d5384100 f9401c01 b9401aa3 b40002e1 (f8227881)
00510 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
00510 Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception
00510 SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
00510 Kernel Offset: disabled
00510 CPU features: 0x0000,000000e0,00000410,8240500b
00510 Memory Limit: none
Investigation indicates that these bits are already set when we allocate
slab page and are not zeroed out after allocation. We are not yet sure
why these crashes start happening only recently but regardless of the
reason, not initializing a field that gets used later is wrong. Fix it
by initializing slab->obj_exts during slab page allocation.3hCVE-2026-105256.1 MED7.1%
——2The NEX-Forms WordPress plugin before 9.2.3 does not sanitise and escape some submitted form data before storing it and outputting it back in the admin dashboard, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability which could allow unauthenticated users to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks against high privilege users such as administrators when they view the submitted entries.18dCVE-2025-33189—7.1%
——2——CVE-2025-38530—7.1%
——2——CVE-2025-68915—7.1%
——2——CVE-2025-53479—7.1%
——2——CVE-2025-27377—7.0%
——2——CVE-2025-38529—7.1%
——2——CVE-2025-53478—7.1%
——2——CVE-2025-48068—7.1%
——2——CVE-2023-53085—7.1%
——2——CVE-2022-20223—7.1%
——2——CVE-2025-7339—7.1%
——2——CVE-2022-498837.1 HIG7.1%
——2In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: x86: smm: number of GPRs in the SMRAM image depends on the image format
On 64 bit host, if the guest doesn't have X86_FEATURE_LM, KVM will
access 16 gprs to 32-bit smram image, causing out-ouf-bound ram
access.
On 32 bit host, the rsm_load_state_64/enter_smm_save_state_64
is compiled out, thus access overflow can't happen.4hCVE-2026-221885.5 MED7.1%
——2The deploy-stub component in Panda3D versions up to and including 1.10.16 contains a denial of service vulnerability due to unbounded stack allocation. The deploy-stub executable allocates argv_copy and argv_copy2 using alloca() based directly on the attacker-controlled argc value without validation. Supplying a large number of command-line arguments can exhaust stack space and propagate uninitialized stack memory into Python interpreter initialization, resulting in a reliable crash and undefined behavior.21d