PULSE
LIVE13signals / 24h
FEED
ransomcrpxo reclama a Encore Enterprises, Inc. · US · Otherransomthegentlemen reclama a Philippine Savings Bank · PH · Financial Servicesransomplay reclama a The Butcher Brothers · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomplay reclama a Sigma Plastics Group · US · Manufacturingransomplay reclama a Cambridge Management · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a quantinuum.com · US · Technologyransomglobal secret group reclama a Vernon & Waldrep · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a The Saturday Evening Post · US · Otherransomqilin reclama a Commercial Furniture Interiors · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Dienst Pack Systems · DE · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Ceragres · CA · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Pointe Property Group · US · Otherransomqilin reclama a Schreiner Trockenbau GmbH · AT · Manufacturingransomgammax reclama a MTCO (Mahmoud Altaheni & Partners Trading Co) · SA · Otherransomcrpxo reclama a Encore Enterprises, Inc. · US · Otherransomthegentlemen reclama a Philippine Savings Bank · PH · Financial Servicesransomplay reclama a The Butcher Brothers · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomplay reclama a Sigma Plastics Group · US · Manufacturingransomplay reclama a Cambridge Management · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a quantinuum.com · US · Technologyransomglobal secret group reclama a Vernon & Waldrep · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a The Saturday Evening Post · US · Otherransomqilin reclama a Commercial Furniture Interiors · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Dienst Pack Systems · DE · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Ceragres · CA · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Pointe Property Group · US · Otherransomqilin reclama a Schreiner Trockenbau GmbH · AT · Manufacturingransomgammax reclama a MTCO (Mahmoud Altaheni & Partners Trading Co) · SA · Other
CVE Watch354,835 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

354,835in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,656
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,601

Distribution · last window

  • Critical
    2,555
  • High
    9,167
  • Medium
    7,427
  • Low
    691
Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities333,441–333,480 · 354,835
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-44022
5.9%
2
CVE-2025-68252
5.9%
2
CVE-2025-217187.8 HIG
5.9%
2In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: rose: fix timer races against user threads Rose timers only acquire the socket spinlock, without checking if the socket is owned by one user thread. Add a check and rearm the timers if needed. BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in rose_timer_expiry+0x31d/0x360 net/rose/rose_timer.c:174 Read of size 2 at addr ffff88802f09b82a by task swapper/0/0 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00172-gd1bf27c4e176 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:489 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:602 rose_timer_expiry+0x31d/0x360 net/rose/rose_timer.c:174 call_timer_fn+0x187/0x650 kernel/time/timer.c:1793 expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1844 [inline] __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:2418 [inline] __run_timer_base+0x66a/0x8e0 kernel/time/timer.c:2430 run_timer_base kernel/time/timer.c:2439 [inline] run_timer_softirq+0xb7/0x170 kernel/time/timer.c:2449 handle_softirqs+0x2d4/0x9b0 kernel/softirq.c:561 __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:595 [inline] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:435 [inline] __irq_exit_rcu+0xf7/0x220 kernel/softirq.c:662 irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:678 instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 [inline] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa6/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 </IRQ>3d
CVE-2026-43859
5.9%
2
CVE-2025-11940
5.9%
2
CVE-2024-51647
5.9%
2
CVE-2026-7859
5.9%
2
CVE-2021-25391
5.9%
2
CVE-2024-44105
5.9%
2
CVE-2025-57942
5.9%
2
CVE-2025-68233
5.9%
2
CVE-2025-383967.8 HIG
5.9%
2In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs: export anon_inode_make_secure_inode() and fix secretmem LSM bypass Export anon_inode_make_secure_inode() to allow KVM guest_memfd to create anonymous inodes with proper security context. This replaces the current pattern of calling alloc_anon_inode() followed by inode_init_security_anon() for creating security context manually. This change also fixes a security regression in secretmem where the S_PRIVATE flag was not cleared after alloc_anon_inode(), causing LSM/SELinux checks to be bypassed for secretmem file descriptors. As guest_memfd currently resides in the KVM module, we need to export this symbol for use outside the core kernel. In the future, guest_memfd might be moved to core-mm, at which point the symbols no longer would have to be exported. When/if that happens is still unclear.3d
CVE-2024-38660
5.9%
2
CVE-2025-58441
5.9%
2
CVE-2026-8564
5.9%
2
CVE-2026-7814
5.9%
2
CVE-2026-43860
5.9%
2
CVE-2026-48990
5.9%
2
CVE-2021-37690
5.9%
2
CVE-2026-12607.8 HIG
5.9%
2Invalid memory access in Sentencepiece versions less than 0.2.1 when using a vulnerable model file, which is not created in the normal training procedure.18d
CVE-2026-43360
5.9%
2
CVE-2024-49561
5.9%
2
CVE-2025-57960
5.9%
2
CVE-2026-0924
5.9%
2
CVE-2026-88817.5 HIG
5.9%
2Version 3.0.7 of the Securly Chrome Extension uses EVP_BytesToKey key derivation with MD5 and a single iteration for AES encryption. MD5 has been broken since 2004 and a single iteration provides no key stretching.11d
CVE-2025-43251
5.9%
2
CVE-2025-68235
5.9%
2
CVE-2025-68237
5.9%
2
CVE-2026-5712
5.9%
2
CVE-2023-41775
5.9%
2
CVE-2025-61604
5.9%
2
CVE-2025-21063
5.9%
2
CVE-2024-20944
5.9%
2
CVE-2023-25947
5.9%
2
CVE-2025-62781
5.9%
2
CVE-2025-33102
5.9%
2
CVE-2025-68343
5.9%
2
CVE-2026-21008
5.9%
2
CVE-2024-31078
5.9%
2
CVE-2025-381417.8 HIG
5.9%
2In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm: fix dm_blk_report_zones If dm_get_live_table() returned NULL, dm_put_live_table() was never called. Also, it is possible that md->zone_revalidate_map will change while calling this function. Only read it once, so that we are always using the same value. Otherwise we might miss a call to dm_put_live_table(). Finally, while md->zone_revalidate_map is set and a process is calling blk_revalidate_disk_zones() to set up the zone append emulation resources, it is possible that another process, perhaps triggered by blkdev_report_zones_ioctl(), will call dm_blk_report_zones(). If blk_revalidate_disk_zones() fails, these resources can be freed while the other process is still using them, causing a use-after-free error. blk_revalidate_disk_zones() will only ever be called when initially setting up the zone append emulation resources, such as when setting up a zoned dm-crypt table for the first time. Further table swaps will not set md->zone_revalidate_map or call blk_revalidate_disk_zones(). However it must be called using the new table (referenced by md->zone_revalidate_map) and the new queue limits while the DM device is suspended. dm_blk_report_zones() needs some way to distinguish between a call from blk_revalidate_disk_zones(), which must be allowed to use md->zone_revalidate_map to access this not yet activated table, and all other calls to dm_blk_report_zones(), which should not be allowed while the device is suspended and cannot use md->zone_revalidate_map, since the zone resources might be freed by the process currently calling blk_revalidate_disk_zones(). Solve this by tracking the process that sets md->zone_revalidate_map in dm_revalidate_zones() and only allowing that process to make use of it in dm_blk_report_zones().3d