PULSE
LIVE52signals / 24h
FEED
ransomcrpxo reclama a KUVEYT TURK · TR · Financial Servicesransomcrpxo reclama a FINANSBANK · TR · Financial Servicesransomcrpxo reclama a ANADOLUBANK · TR · Financial Servicesransomcrpxo reclama a THY · TR · Transportationransomcrpxo reclama a JOHNSON & JOHNSON · US · Healthcareransomcrpxo reclama a DOĞAN HOLDİNG · TR · Otherransomcrpxo reclama a ANADOLU SİGORTA · TR · Financial Servicesransomcrpxo reclama a HYUNDAI · KR · Manufacturingransomcrpxo reclama a ASELSAN · TR · Government & Defenseransomcrpxo reclama a A101 · TR · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Community Management Associates · US · Professional Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Las Cenizas · CL · Otherransomthegentlemen reclama a Kenaitze Indian Tribe · US · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Additive Manufacturing · US · Manufacturingransomcrpxo reclama a KUVEYT TURK · TR · Financial Servicesransomcrpxo reclama a FINANSBANK · TR · Financial Servicesransomcrpxo reclama a ANADOLUBANK · TR · Financial Servicesransomcrpxo reclama a THY · TR · Transportationransomcrpxo reclama a JOHNSON & JOHNSON · US · Healthcareransomcrpxo reclama a DOĞAN HOLDİNG · TR · Otherransomcrpxo reclama a ANADOLU SİGORTA · TR · Financial Servicesransomcrpxo reclama a HYUNDAI · KR · Manufacturingransomcrpxo reclama a ASELSAN · TR · Government & Defenseransomcrpxo reclama a A101 · TR · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Community Management Associates · US · Professional Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Las Cenizas · CL · Otherransomthegentlemen reclama a Kenaitze Indian Tribe · US · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Additive Manufacturing · US · Manufacturing
CVE Watch354,684 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

354,684in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,656
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,601

Distribution · last window

  • Critical
    2,622
  • High
    9,423
  • Medium
    7,591
  • Low
    711
Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities335,681–335,720 · 354,684
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2024-48865
5.2%
2
CVE-2019-9470
5.2%
2
CVE-2017-6262
5.2%
2
CVE-2025-38418
5.2%
2
CVE-2021-47590
5.2%
2
CVE-2022-45128
5.2%
2
CVE-2025-1078
5.2%
2
CVE-2019-9471
5.2%
2
CVE-2026-42004
5.2%
2
CVE-2025-62144
5.2%
2
CVE-2024-6219
5.2%
2
CVE-2025-38609
5.2%
2
CVE-2026-3694
5.2%
2
CVE-2025-38587
5.2%
2
CVE-2025-38364
5.2%
2
CVE-2026-65656.4 MED
5.2%
2The Style Kits – Advanced Theme Styles for Elementor, Elementor Kits & Elementor Patterns plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the '/wp-json/agwp/v1/tokens/save' endpoint kit title parameter in versions up to, and including, 2.5.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping in an admin attribute context. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.9d
CVE-2025-38354
5.2%
2
CVE-2025-68134
5.2%
2
CVE-2025-682607.8 HIG
5.2%
2In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rust_binder: fix race condition on death_list Rust Binder contains the following unsafe operation: // SAFETY: A `NodeDeath` is never inserted into the death list // of any node other than its owner, so it is either in this // death list or in no death list. unsafe { node_inner.death_list.remove(self) }; This operation is unsafe because when touching the prev/next pointers of a list element, we have to ensure that no other thread is also touching them in parallel. If the node is present in the list that `remove` is called on, then that is fine because we have exclusive access to that list. If the node is not in any list, then it's also ok. But if it's present in a different list that may be accessed in parallel, then that may be a data race on the prev/next pointers. And unfortunately that is exactly what is happening here. In Node::release, we: 1. Take the lock. 2. Move all items to a local list on the stack. 3. Drop the lock. 4. Iterate the local list on the stack. Combined with threads using the unsafe remove method on the original list, this leads to memory corruption of the prev/next pointers. This leads to crashes like this one: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 000bb9841bcac70e Mem abort info: ESR = 0x0000000096000044 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000044, ISS2 = 0x00000000 CM = 0, WnR = 1, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [000bb9841bcac70e] address between user and kernel address ranges Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000044 [#1] PREEMPT SMP google-cdd 538c004.gcdd: context saved(CPU:1) item - log_kevents is disabled Modules linked in: ... rust_binder CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2092 Comm: kworker/1:178 Tainted: G S W OE 6.12.52-android16-5-g98debd5df505-4k #1 f94a6367396c5488d635708e43ee0c888d230b0b Tainted: [S]=CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC, [W]=WARN, [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Hardware name: MUSTANG PVT 1.0 based on LGA (DT) Workqueue: events _RNvXs6_NtCsdfZWD8DztAw_6kernel9workqueueINtNtNtB7_4sync3arc3ArcNtNtCs8QPsHWIn21X_16rust_binder_main7process7ProcessEINtB5_15WorkItemPointerKy0_E3runB13_ [rust_binder] pstate: 23400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : _RNvXs3_NtCs8QPsHWIn21X_16rust_binder_main7processNtB5_7ProcessNtNtCsdfZWD8DztAw_6kernel9workqueue8WorkItem3run+0x450/0x11f8 [rust_binder] lr : _RNvXs3_NtCs8QPsHWIn21X_16rust_binder_main7processNtB5_7ProcessNtNtCsdfZWD8DztAw_6kernel9workqueue8WorkItem3run+0x464/0x11f8 [rust_binder] sp : ffffffc09b433ac0 x29: ffffffc09b433d30 x28: ffffff8821690000 x27: ffffffd40cbaa448 x26: ffffff8821690000 x25: 00000000ffffffff x24: ffffff88d0376578 x23: 0000000000000001 x22: ffffffc09b433c78 x21: ffffff88e8f9bf40 x20: ffffff88e8f9bf40 x19: ffffff882692b000 x18: ffffffd40f10bf00 x17: 00000000c006287d x16: 00000000c006287d x15: 00000000000003b0 x14: 0000000000000100 x13: 000000201cb79ae0 x12: fffffffffffffff0 x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000001 x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : b80bb9841bcac706 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : fffffffebee63f30 x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000004c31 x1 : ffffff88216900c0 x0 : ffffff88e8f9bf00 Call trace: _RNvXs3_NtCs8QPsHWIn21X_16rust_binder_main7processNtB5_7ProcessNtNtCsdfZWD8DztAw_6kernel9workqueue8WorkItem3run+0x450/0x11f8 [rust_binder bbc172b53665bbc815363b22e97e3f7e3fe971fc] process_scheduled_works+0x1c4/0x45c worker_thread+0x32c/0x3e8 kthread+0x11c/0x1c8 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Code: 94218d85 b4000155 a94026a8 d10102a0 (f9000509) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Thus, modify Node::release to pop items directly off the original list.2d
CVE-2026-33450
5.2%
2
CVE-2025-384497.8 HIG
5.2%
2In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/gem: Acquire references on GEM handles for framebuffers A GEM handle can be released while the GEM buffer object is attached to a DRM framebuffer. This leads to the release of the dma-buf backing the buffer object, if any. [1] Trying to use the framebuffer in further mode-setting operations leads to a segmentation fault. Most easily happens with driver that use shadow planes for vmap-ing the dma-buf during a page flip. An example is shown below. [ 156.791968] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 156.796830] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2255 at drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c:1527 dma_buf_vmap+0x224/0x430 [...] [ 156.942028] RIP: 0010:dma_buf_vmap+0x224/0x430 [ 157.043420] Call Trace: [ 157.045898] <TASK> [ 157.048030] ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1af/0x2c0 [ 157.052436] ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1af/0x2c0 [ 157.056836] ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1af/0x2c0 [ 157.061253] ? drm_gem_shmem_vmap+0x74/0x710 [ 157.065567] ? dma_buf_vmap+0x224/0x430 [ 157.069446] ? __warn.cold+0x58/0xe4 [ 157.073061] ? dma_buf_vmap+0x224/0x430 [ 157.077111] ? report_bug+0x1dd/0x390 [ 157.080842] ? handle_bug+0x5e/0xa0 [ 157.084389] ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x50 [ 157.088291] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 [ 157.092548] ? dma_buf_vmap+0x224/0x430 [ 157.096663] ? dma_resv_get_singleton+0x6d/0x230 [ 157.101341] ? __pfx_dma_buf_vmap+0x10/0x10 [ 157.105588] ? __pfx_dma_resv_get_singleton+0x10/0x10 [ 157.110697] drm_gem_shmem_vmap+0x74/0x710 [ 157.114866] drm_gem_vmap+0xa9/0x1b0 [ 157.118763] drm_gem_vmap_unlocked+0x46/0xa0 [ 157.123086] drm_gem_fb_vmap+0xab/0x300 [ 157.126979] drm_atomic_helper_prepare_planes.part.0+0x487/0xb10 [ 157.133032] ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x19d/0x880 [ 157.137701] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x13d/0x2e0 [ 157.142671] ? drm_atomic_nonblocking_commit+0xa0/0x180 [ 157.147988] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x766/0xe40 [...] [ 157.346424] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Acquiring GEM handles for the framebuffer's GEM buffer objects prevents this from happening. The framebuffer's cleanup later puts the handle references. Commit 1a148af06000 ("drm/gem-shmem: Use dma_buf from GEM object instance") triggers the segmentation fault easily by using the dma-buf field more widely. The underlying issue with reference counting has been present before. v2: - acquire the handle instead of the BO (Christian) - fix comment style (Christian) - drop the Fixes tag (Christian) - rename err_ gotos - add missing Link tag2d
CVE-2025-33012
5.2%
2
CVE-2025-2002
5.2%
2
CVE-2024-8272
5.2%
2
CVE-2026-45873
5.2%
2
CVE-2023-2334
5.2%
2
CVE-2025-38583
5.2%
2
CVE-2026-565383.5 LOW
5.2%
2An endpoint in HCL Connections is vulnerable to information disclosure. In certain scenarios this might lead to disclosing sensitive information to unauthorized users.1d
CVE-2026-31974
5.2%
2
CVE-2021-30345
5.2%
2
CVE-2021-30346
5.2%
2
CVE-2025-1390
5.2%
2
CVE-2026-32643
5.2%
2
CVE-2026-565373.5 LOW
5.2%
2HCL Connections is vulnerable to information disclosure which could allow a user to obtain sensitive information they are not entitled to, caused by improper handling of request data.they are not entitled to, caused by improper handling of request data.1d
CVE-2017-6283
5.2%
2
CVE-2026-33410
5.2%
2
CVE-2026-32119
5.2%
2
CVE-2024-25957
5.2%
2
CVE-2021-0606
5.2%
2
CVE-2025-38409
5.2%
2