Vulnerabilities exploitable today
352,162in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,653
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,590
Distribution · last window
- Critical2,073
- High6,924
- Medium5,904
- Low547
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-35177—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-50021—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-316807.8 HIG2.7%
——1In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ipv6: flowlabel: defer exclusive option free until RCU teardown
`ip6fl_seq_show()` walks the global flowlabel hash under the seq-file
RCU read-side lock and prints `fl->opt->opt_nflen` when an option block
is present.
Exclusive flowlabels currently free `fl->opt` as soon as `fl->users`
drops to zero in `fl_release()`. However, the surrounding
`struct ip6_flowlabel` remains visible in the global hash table until
later garbage collection removes it and `fl_free_rcu()` finally tears it
down.
A concurrent `/proc/net/ip6_flowlabel` reader can therefore race that
early `kfree()` and dereference freed option state, triggering a crash
in `ip6fl_seq_show()`.
Fix this by keeping `fl->opt` alive until `fl_free_rcu()`. That matches
the lifetime already required for the enclosing flowlabel while readers
can still reach it under RCU.9dCVE-2026-45952—2.7%
——1——CVE-2025-24923—2.7%
——1——CVE-2024-53007—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-467288.2 HIG2.7%
——1Das U-Boot before 2026.04 allows FIT (Flat Image Tree) signature verification bypass because hashed-nodes is omitted from a hash.9dCVE-2025-58323—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-43903—2.7%
——1——CVE-2020-10846—2.7%
——1——CVE-2025-13131—2.7%
——1——CVE-2024-35140—2.7%
——1——CVE-2018-25273—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-2245—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-41965—2.7%
——1——CVE-2024-52288—2.7%
——1——CVE-2023-25189—2.7%
——1——CVE-2025-22838—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-229775.5 MED2.7%
——1In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: sock: fix hardened usercopy panic in sock_recv_errqueue
skbuff_fclone_cache was created without defining a usercopy region,
[1] unlike skbuff_head_cache which properly whitelists the cb[] field.
[2] This causes a usercopy BUG() when CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY is
enabled and the kernel attempts to copy sk_buff.cb data to userspace
via sock_recv_errqueue() -> put_cmsg().
The crash occurs when: 1. TCP allocates an skb using alloc_skb_fclone()
(from skbuff_fclone_cache) [1]
2. The skb is cloned via skb_clone() using the pre-allocated fclone
[3] 3. The cloned skb is queued to sk_error_queue for timestamp
reporting 4. Userspace reads the error queue via recvmsg(MSG_ERRQUEUE)
5. sock_recv_errqueue() calls put_cmsg() to copy serr->ee from skb->cb
[4] 6. __check_heap_object() fails because skbuff_fclone_cache has no
usercopy whitelist [5]
When cloned skbs allocated from skbuff_fclone_cache are used in the
socket error queue, accessing the sock_exterr_skb structure in skb->cb
via put_cmsg() triggers a usercopy hardening violation:
[ 5.379589] usercopy: Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object 'skbuff_fclone_cache' (offset 296, size 16)!
[ 5.382796] kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:102!
[ 5.383923] Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
[ 5.384903] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 138 Comm: poc_put_cmsg Not tainted 6.12.57 #7
[ 5.384903] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 5.384903] RIP: 0010:usercopy_abort+0x6c/0x80
[ 5.384903] Code: 1a 86 51 48 c7 c2 40 15 1a 86 41 52 48 c7 c7 c0 15 1a 86 48 0f 45 d6 48 c7 c6 80 15 1a 86 48 89 c1 49 0f 45 f3 e8 84 27 88 ff <0f> 0b 490
[ 5.384903] RSP: 0018:ffffc900006f77a8 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 5.384903] RAX: 000000000000006f RBX: ffff88800f0ad2a8 RCX: 1ffffffff0f72e74
[ 5.384903] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffffff87b973a0
[ 5.384903] RBP: 0000000000000010 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff0f72e74
[ 5.384903] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 79706f6372657375 R12: 0000000000000001
[ 5.384903] R13: ffff88800f0ad2b8 R14: ffffea00003c2b40 R15: ffffea00003c2b00
[ 5.384903] FS: 0000000011bc4380(0000) GS:ffff8880bf100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 5.384903] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 5.384903] CR2: 000056aa3b8e5fe4 CR3: 000000000ea26004 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
[ 5.384903] PKRU: 55555554
[ 5.384903] Call Trace:
[ 5.384903] <TASK>
[ 5.384903] __check_heap_object+0x9a/0xd0
[ 5.384903] __check_object_size+0x46c/0x690
[ 5.384903] put_cmsg+0x129/0x5e0
[ 5.384903] sock_recv_errqueue+0x22f/0x380
[ 5.384903] tls_sw_recvmsg+0x7ed/0x1960
[ 5.384903] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 5.384903] ? schedule+0x6d/0x270
[ 5.384903] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 5.384903] ? mutex_unlock+0x81/0xd0
[ 5.384903] ? __pfx_mutex_unlock+0x10/0x10
[ 5.384903] ? __pfx_tls_sw_recvmsg+0x10/0x10
[ 5.384903] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x8f/0xf0
[ 5.384903] ? _raw_read_unlock_irqrestore+0x20/0x40
[ 5.384903] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
The crash offset 296 corresponds to skb2->cb within skbuff_fclones:
- sizeof(struct sk_buff) = 232 - offsetof(struct sk_buff, cb) = 40 -
offset of skb2.cb in fclones = 232 + 40 = 272 - crash offset 296 =
272 + 24 (inside sock_exterr_skb.ee)
This patch uses a local stack variable as a bounce buffer to avoid the hardened usercopy check failure.
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12.62/source/net/ipv4/tcp.c#L885
[2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12.62/source/net/core/skbuff.c#L5104
[3] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12.62/source/net/core/skbuff.c#L5566
[4] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12.62/source/net/core/skbuff.c#L5491
[5] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12.62/source/mm/slub.c#L57199dCVE-2026-46182—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-42250—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-23076—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-53423—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-43144—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-23107—2.7%
——1——CVE-2025-71203—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-41396—2.7%
——1——CVE-2025-37127—2.7%
——1——CVE-2025-43274—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-46171—2.7%
——1——CVE-2025-46366—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-6691—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-42890—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-55693—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-3589—2.7%
——1——CVE-2024-47476—2.7%
——1——CVE-2025-71293—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-46134—2.7%
——1——CVE-2025-71285—2.7%
——1——CVE-2026-11858—2.7%
——1——