Vulnerabilities exploitable today
349,429in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,647
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,582
Distribution · last window
- Critical1,327
- High4,319
- Medium3,691
- Low289
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2023-20647—0.7%
——0——CVE-2024-45570—0.7%
——0——CVE-2023-20984—0.7%
——0——CVE-2024-45563—0.7%
——0——CVE-2026-47328—0.7%
——0——CVE-2025-1243—0.7%
——0——CVE-2023-20709—0.7%
——0——CVE-2025-39769—0.7%
——0——CVE-2023-32872—0.7%
——0——CVE-2026-529795.5 MED0.7%
——0In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: psp: check for device unregister when creating assoc
psp_assoc_device_get_locked() obtains a psp_dev reference via
psp_dev_get_for_sock() (which uses psp_dev_tryget() under RCU);
it then acquires psd->lock and drops the reference. Before
the lock is taken, psp_dev_unregister() can run to completion:
take psd->lock, clear out state, unlock, drop the registration
reference.
The expectation is that the lock prevents device unregistration,
but much like with netdevs special care has to be taken when
"upgrading" a reference to a locked device. Add the missing
check if device is still alive. psp_dev_is_registered() exists
already but had no callers, which makes me wonder if I either
forgot to add this or lost the check during refactoring...4dCVE-2026-20083—0.7%
——0——CVE-2026-1653—0.7%
——0——CVE-2024-49830—0.7%
——0——CVE-2023-20660—0.7%
——0——CVE-2023-20644—0.7%
——0——CVE-2024-45583—0.7%
——0——CVE-2025-39910—0.7%
——0——CVE-2026-21029—0.7%
——0——CVE-2023-40120—0.7%
——0——CVE-2023-20731—0.7%
——0——CVE-2023-40125—0.7%
——0——CVE-2026-25908—0.7%
——0——CVE-2026-530207.8 HIG0.7%
——0In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
um: Fix potential race condition in TLB sync
During the TLB sync, we need to traverse and modify the page table,
so we should hold the page table lock. Since full SMP support for
threads within the same process is still missing, let's disable the
split page table lock for simplicity.3dCVE-2026-46159—0.7%
——0——CVE-2026-46014—0.7%
——0——CVE-2023-32883—0.7%
——0——CVE-2023-32885—0.7%
——0——CVE-2026-21017—0.7%
——0——CVE-2023-20696—0.7%
——0——CVE-2022-20323—0.7%
——0——CVE-2023-21200—0.7%
——0——CVE-2025-14599—0.7%
——0——CVE-2024-20064—0.7%
——0——CVE-2022-26475—0.7%
——0——CVE-2026-47166—0.7%
——0——CVE-2025-59131—0.7%
——0——CVE-2026-20110—0.7%
——0——CVE-2025-47364—0.7%
——0——CVE-2023-20628—0.7%
——0——CVE-2026-23857—0.7%
——0——