Vulnerabilities exploitable today
365,446in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,682
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,626
Distribution · last window
- Critical2,337
- High10,008
- Medium4,921
- Low461
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-51256——
——0Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.27dCVE-2026-19684——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.5dCVE-2026-22656——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.17dCVE-2026-51265——
——0Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.27dCVE-2026-61605——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-58655. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-58655. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-58655 instead of this candidate.43dCVE-2026-68575——
——0Rejected reason: Reserved via standalone CLI outside the OSIM flaw workflow; releasing so the CVE ID can be properly reserved and linked through OSIM when the flaw is worked.27dCVE-2026-26229——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.17dCVE-2026-51236——
——0Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.27dCVE-2026-51250——
——0Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.27dCVE-2026-51253——
——0Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.27dCVE-2026-51230——
——0Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.27dCVE-2026-68576——
——0Rejected reason: Reserved via standalone CLI outside the OSIM flaw workflow; releasing so the CVE ID can be properly reserved and linked through OSIM when the flaw is worked.27dCVE-2026-28533——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.17dCVE-2026-29030——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.17dCVE-2026-68574——
——0Rejected reason: Reserved via standalone CLI outside the OSIM flaw workflow; releasing so the CVE ID can be properly reserved and linked through OSIM when the flaw is worked.27dCVE-2026-29029——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.17dCVE-2023-54373——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected.16dCVE-2026-62168——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61443. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61443. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61443 instead of this candidate.43dCVE-2025-47332—0.0%
——0——CVE-2026-28999——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.17dCVE-2026-32835——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.22dCVE-2026-51287——
——0Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.27dCVE-2026-0112—0.0%
——0——CVE-2026-51386——
——0Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-46409. Reason: This record is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2026-46409. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-46409 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage.38dCVE-2026-74228——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.8dCVE-2026-62175——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-60091. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-60091. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-60091 instead of this candidate.43dCVE-2023-7336——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.6dCVE-2026-51233——
——0Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.27dCVE-2023-54387——
——0Rejected reason: Erroneously reserved under wrong year by automation defect; never assigned.22dCVE-2026-537626.2 MED0.0%
——0VeraCrypt provides disk encryption with strong security based on TrueCrypt. Prior to 1.26.29, non-default builds created with WOLFCRYPT=1 and WOLFCRYPT_BACKEND route SHA-256 and SHA-512 volume-header key derivation through derive_key_sha256 and derive_key_sha512 in src/Crypto/wolfCrypt.c, where the configured iterations value is discarded and wc_HKDF is used instead of PBKDF2-HMAC. Changing the PIM or iteration count therefore does not increase derivation cost, allowing an attacker with an affected container, disk image, or volume header to perform substantially cheaper offline password guesses. Official precompiled VeraCrypt binaries and normal distribution packages use the standard PBKDF2 backend and are not affected. Volumes created by an affected WOLFCRYPT=1 build require backup and recreation because corrected builds derive different keys. This issue is fixed in version 1.26.29.6dCVE-2026-29026——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.17dCVE-2026-8055——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-48866. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2026-48866. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-48866 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.43dCVE-2026-68948——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-67318. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-67318. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-67318 instead of this candidate.21dCVE-2026-25074——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.17dCVE-2022-33724—0.0%
——0——CVE-2023-20827—0.0%
——0——CVE-2026-76069——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.6dCVE-2026-73323——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.6dCVE-2026-49946——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.50dCVE-2026-11418——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.6d