Vulnerabilities exploitable today
366,836in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,685
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,629
Distribution · last window
- Critical2,360
- High9,604
- Medium5,458
- Low531
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-822565.3 MED—
———SvelteKit before 2.69.1 fails to properly validate remote form function payload sizes, allowing attackers to crash the Node process by sending large payloads. Repeated exploitation causes denial of service by repeatedly crashing the application process.12hCVE-2026-822574.3 MED—
———SvelteKit versions before 2.69.1 contain a prototype pollution vulnerability in remote form functions with file input fields that accept arbitrary user-controlled path names. Attackers can manipulate the deletion path to remove methods on the prototype, potentially disabling application functionality.12hCVE-2026-82258——
———SvelteKit versions from 2.38.0 before 2.60.1 contain a race condition in query.batch that allows concurrent requests from different users to merge under a single request context. Attackers can exploit specific timing conditions to access sensitive data from other users' concurrent requests.12hCVE-2026-822597.5 HIG—
———SvelteKit versions from 2.49.0 through 2.53.2 (fixed in 2.53.3) contain a deserialization expansion issue in the experimental form remote function. When an application enables experimental.remoteFunctions and uses the form function to process the files array without validating files.length or individual file sizes, an attacker can submit relatively small inputs that expand into very large file arrays, leading to expensive processing and denial of service.12hCVE-2026-822607.5 HIG—
———SvelteKit (@sveltejs/kit) versions >=2.49.0 and <=2.52.1 with experimental remote functions (experimental.remoteFunctions) and form enabled contain a memory exhaustion vulnerability in remote form deserialization. Malformed form data can cause excessive memory allocation, crashing the server process and resulting in denial of service. Fixed in 2.52.2.10hCVE-2026-822617.5 HIG—
———SvelteKit (@sveltejs/kit) versions >=2.49.0 and <=2.52.1 with experimental remote functions and form enabled contain a CPU exhaustion vulnerability in form deserialization. An attacker can send malformed form data to cause the server to become unresponsive while processing the request, resulting in denial of service. Fixed in 2.52.2.12hCVE-2026-13761——
———Pega Platform versions 7.1.0 through 25.1.2 are affected by an improper validation of inputs that are used for loop conditions, potentially leading to a denial of service or other consequences because of excessive looping.10hCVE-2026-14942——
———Rejected reason: This CVE ID was assigned to a reported vulnerability in the Customer Reviews for WooCommerce WordPress plugin and was never published. The report was withdrawn: the precondition it depends on, an attacker obtaining a review form identifier belonging to a customer they do not already have access to, could not be demonstrated. No advisory was issued for this ID.14hCVE-2026-37236——
———grpc-gateway v2.28.0 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The application processes the X-HTTP-Method-Override header in ServeMux.ServeHTTP without restricting allowed methods. When a POST request with Content-Type application/x-www-form-urlencoded includes this header, the request method is rewritten to an arbitrary attacker-supplied value before routing. This allows bypassing method-based access controls enforced by upstream proxies or WAFs.14hCVE-2026-372377.5 HIG—
———vLLM up to and including 0.17.0 allows remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service via memory exhaustion. The AsyncMediaIO.fetch_audio and AsyncMediaIO.fetch_image functions in multimodal/inputs.py fetch user-supplied media URLs using aiohttp and call r.read() without enforcing a maximum response size, allowing an attacker to exhaust server memory by providing a URL to an arbitrarily large file.8hCVE-2026-377106.1 MED—
———Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in Omeka S v.4.2.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the site navigation custom URL function8hCVE-2026-377367.5 HIG—
———An issue in the JsonSanitizer.sanitize() component of OWASP json-sanitizer v1.2.3 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input.10hCVE-2026-377519.8 CRI—
———An OS command injection vulnerability in the killSessionSync function (lib/agent-runtime.ts) of 23blocks-OS ai-maestro v0.24.17 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted input.8hCVE-2026-386367.5 HIG—
———An issue in the seekdir() function (/dirent/mod.rs) of relibc commit 61f42d allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input.8hCVE-2026-386387.5 HIG—
———An issue in the with_argv function (/unistd/mod.rs) of relibc commit 61f42d allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input.8hCVE-2026-387255.4 MED—
———xipblog module v2.0.1 and before for PrestaShop allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript via the name and content parameters in ajax.php. The input is stored in the database without HTML sanitization and rendered in Smarty templates without output escaping, resulting in Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). When an administrator reviews comments in the back office, the payload executes with admin-level session context, leading to full store compromise.10hCVE-2026-34236.4 MED—
———The Envira Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the gallery 'description' configuration field in all versions up to, and including, 1.12.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses a page displaying the gallery with a description enabled.10hCVE-2026-43785.4 MED—
———Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Akilli Ticaret Software Technologies Ltd. E-Commerce Pack allows Stored XSS.
This issue affects E-Commerce Pack: from 4.5.001 through 28082026. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.10hCVE-2026-509798.1 HIG—
———A command injection vulnerability in the 'advanced/curl' component of Osbil Technology oPanel v1.19.50 and earlier allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands via the 'url' parameter10hCVE-2026-58106——
———CVE-2025-40843 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5xf2-f6ch-6p8r was fixed by replacing unchecked strcpy() with a bounded safe_strcpy() helper.
At ldlogger-tool-gcc.c:129 the destination passed to that helper is fullPath + 2, but the size
passed down is the full PATH_MAX. safe_strcpy() is strncpy(), which NUL-pads the
destination out to the whole n, so this site writes 4096 bytes into the 4094 that remain — a
2-byte stack overflow on every invocation, independent of the input path's length.
This issue affects CodeChecker: through 6.28.2.10hCVE-2026-50965.3 MED—
———The Everest Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.4. This is due to the `load_previous_field_value()` method in `class-evf-form-task.php` accepting arbitrary URL values from `$_POST` data for upload fields without domain restriction, which are then passed to `wp_remote_head()` in the `get_local_file_size()` method of `class-evf-form-fields-upload.php`. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to force the WordPress server to make outbound HTTP HEAD requests to arbitrary URLs by submitting a form with an upload field containing a malicious URL while leaving a required field empty to trigger form re-rendering.10hCVE-2026-58006.1 MED—
———Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Dayneks Software Industry and Trade Inc. E-Commerce Platform allows Reflected XSS.
This issue affects E-Commerce Platform: through 28082026. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.10hCVE-2026-59536.1 MED—
———Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Ceviz Informatics Inc. Web Design allows Reflected XSS.
This issue affects Web Design: through 25082026.10hCVE-2026-75758——
———Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in the Elixir standard library allows an attacker who controls a list passed to inspect/1, List.to_string/1, or List.to_charlist/1 to exhaust a BEAM node's memory.
Inspect.List's charlist branch in lib/elixir/lib/inspect.ex classifies a list as a charlist using List.ascii_printable?/2, which examines only the first :printable_limit (4096 by default) elements, and then calls IO.chardata_to_string/1 on the whole term. A list whose printable prefix exceeds that limit but which contains a later element that is not a code point (an atom, an out-of-range integer, or an improper tail) is therefore mis-classified, and the conversion raises ArgumentError. That conversion runs inside List.to_string/1, whose rescue clause builds its message by interpolating inspect(list), which re-enters the same branch and raises again. The nested inspection is an argument to raise, so the recursion is not in tail position and every level is retained: the process stack grows monotonically while each cycle re-walks the list, until the process is killed by max_heap_size or, by default, the node runs out of memory. List.to_charlist/1 has the same rescue shape.
Below the printable limit the inner inspect/1 sees the invalid element within its counter and renders the list in ordinary bracket form, so a single ArgumentError is raised and no recursion occurs.
This issue affects elixir: from 1.15.0-rc.0 before 1.18.5, from 1.19.0-rc.0 before 1.19.6, and from 1.20.0-rc.0 before 1.20.4.10hCVE-2026-810197.4 HIG—
———wolfProvider before 1.2.2 generates the 8-byte explicit AES-GCM nonce once when the TLS write key is set and never increments it per record. As a result every TLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.2 AES-GCM record within a connection is encrypted under an identical key and nonce pair. Reusing a GCM key and nonce discloses the keystream (the XOR of two ciphertexts equals the XOR of their plaintexts, so one known record recovers the others) and leaks the GHASH authentication key, enabling authentication tag forgery. AES-CCM, TLS 1.3, and non-TLS use of the cipher are not affected.10hCVE-2026-812844.3 MED—
———Contributor Broken Access Control in ACF Extended <= 0.9.2.6 versions.10hCVE-2026-812857.5 HIG—
———Unauthenticated Denial of Service Attack in Smush Image Compression and Optimization <= 4.2.0 versions.10hCVE-2026-812994.3 MED—
———Subscriber Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in WP Job Portal <= 2.5.9 versions.10hCVE-2026-813416.5 MED—
———wolfEngine before 1.4.1 sources the explicit AES-CCM nonce for TLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.2 records from the record input buffer instead of the TLS sequence number carried in the additional authenticated data. Because the record layer leaves the explicit-nonce field for the cipher to populate, the value read is constant across records, so every AES-CCM record within a connection is encrypted under an identical key and nonce pair. Reusing a CCM key and nonce weakens confidentiality (identical keystream across records, so a known record recovers the others) and integrity (authentication tag forgery). Only wolfEngine is affected; wolfProvider is not. AES-GCM under wolfEngine is tracked separately. AES-CCM cipher suites are not enabled by default and must be explicitly selected, which limits exposure. TLS 1.3 and non-TLS use of the cipher are not affected.10hCVE-2026-81578——
———An improper access control vulnerability exists in the web management interface of PaperCut MF and PaperCut NG. Under specific conditions, unauthenticated remote requests targeting administrative functions can trigger backend actions prior to the completion of access validation checks. This allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to modify certain system configurations.2hCVE-2026-817577.2 HIG—
———Author Remote Code Execution (RCE) in Rank Math SEO <= 1.0.276 versions.10hCVE-2026-817595.4 MED—
———Contributor Broken Access Control in WpEvently <= 5.5.0 versions.10hCVE-2026-817607.1 HIG—
———Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Crocoblock JetEngine allows Reflected XSS.
This issue affects JetEngine: from n/a through 3.8.14.2.10hCVE-2026-817614.3 MED—
———Subscriber Broken Access Control in WpEvently <= 5.5.0 versions.10hCVE-2026-817677.5 HIG—
———Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Simple Payment <= 2.5.2 versions.10hCVE-2026-821123.5 LOW—
———A flaw has been found in houtini-ai houtini-lm up to 2.13.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file src/index.ts of the component code_task_files. Executing a manipulation can lead to path traversal. The attack can be launched remotely. This patch is called 35d97bca0531894da36a85aedb95312da1bd5b7a. It is best practice to apply a patch to resolve this issue.10hCVE-2026-821815.5 MED—
———Medical Practice Management System developed by Le-yan has a Sensitive Data in URL vulnerability. Unauthenticated remote attackers can obtain sensitive information via victim's browser history or log files.10hCVE-2026-822205.3 MED—
———Unauthenticated Other Vulnerability Type in Forminator <= 1.57.1 versions.10hCVE-2026-822278.5 HIG—
———Contributor SQL Injection in WPBulky <= 1.2.2 versions.10hCVE-2026-823246.1 MED—
———A flaw was found in the file-iff (IFF/ILBM) plugin in GIMP. When processing a specially crafted IFF/ILBM image file, the plugin does not properly validate the HAM row size and improperly handles cases where the number of color planes (nPlanes) is zero. This causes a row size mismatch that bypasses memory bounds checking, resulting in heap out-of-bounds reads. This issue can result in an application crash, leading to a denial of service or a limited information disclosure of heap memory contents.11h