Vulnerabilities exploitable today
366,836in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,685
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,629
Distribution · last window
- Critical2,454
- High10,487
- Medium5,458
- Low531
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-822858.2 HIG—
———bisheng through 2.6.0-fix2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /api/v1/workflow/report/callback endpoint that lacks authentication and applies no URL scheme restrictions or host filtering. Unauthenticated attackers can supply arbitrary URLs to enumerate internal network services and cloud metadata endpoints, then retrieve captured responses from object storage using caller-supplied object names.10hCVE-2026-822848.1 HIG—
———Quivr versions through 0.0.322 fail to validate chat ownership in the GET /chat/{chat_id}/history, DELETE /chat/{chat_id}, and POST /chat/{chat_id}/question/answer endpoints. Authenticated attackers can read other users' conversation histories including private knowledge base content, delete arbitrary chats, and inject fabricated messages into other users' conversations.8hCVE-2026-822838.1 HIG—
———VoltAgent through 2.1.20 fails to validate conversation ownership in memory API handlers, allowing authenticated users to access other users' conversations. Attackers can read, modify, and delete arbitrary conversations and messages by supplying caller-controlled identifiers to memory endpoints.8hCVE-2026-380933.3 LOW—
———file_picker (aka flutter_file_picker) for Flutter, all versions through 10.3.10, is vulnerable to path traversal (CWE-22) in its Android implementation. The openFileStream() method in FileUtils.kt uses the DISPLAY_NAME obtained from ContentResolver.query() directly in file path construction without sanitization. A malicious Android app with a crafted ContentProvider can return a filename containing ../ sequences, causing the plugin to create arbitrary files and directories outside the intended cache directory within the victim app's internal storage. Existing files are not overwritten due to an existence check.10hCVE-2026-386367.5 HIG—
———An issue in the seekdir() function (/dirent/mod.rs) of relibc commit 61f42d allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input.8hCVE-2026-386387.5 HIG—
———An issue in the with_argv function (/unistd/mod.rs) of relibc commit 61f42d allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input.8hCVE-2026-387255.4 MED—
———xipblog module v2.0.1 and before for PrestaShop allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript via the name and content parameters in ajax.php. The input is stored in the database without HTML sanitization and rendered in Smarty templates without output escaping, resulting in Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). When an administrator reviews comments in the back office, the payload executes with admin-level session context, leading to full store compromise.10hCVE-2026-822828.0 HIG—
———Atlantis through 0.47.1 fails to authenticate the /github-app/setup endpoint, allowing unauthenticated attackers to access GitHub App credentials. Attackers can observe or intercept the GitHub redirect during setup to obtain the RSA private key and webhook secret, enabling installation token minting and webhook payload forgery.10hCVE-2026-34236.4 MED—
———The Envira Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the gallery 'description' configuration field in all versions up to, and including, 1.12.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses a page displaying the gallery with a description enabled.10hCVE-2026-43785.4 MED—
———Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Akilli Ticaret Software Technologies Ltd. E-Commerce Pack allows Stored XSS.
This issue affects E-Commerce Pack: from 4.5.001 through 28082026. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.10hCVE-2026-509798.1 HIG—
———A command injection vulnerability in the 'advanced/curl' component of Osbil Technology oPanel v1.19.50 and earlier allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands via the 'url' parameter10hCVE-2026-568547.5 HIG—
———The source-address critical option in the Permissions returned by an authentication callback was only enforced for the PublicKeyCallback and VerifiedPublicKeyCallback paths, extending the fix for CVE-2026-46595. Permissions returned by the PasswordCallback, KeyboardInteractiveCallback, NoClientAuthCallback, and GSSAPIWithMICConfig.AllowLogin callbacks were not validated against the client's remote address, so a source-address restriction set by those callbacks was silently ignored. The check is now applied to the Permissions returned by any authentication callback.8hCVE-2026-58106——
———CVE-2025-40843 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5xf2-f6ch-6p8r was fixed by replacing unchecked strcpy() with a bounded safe_strcpy() helper.
At ldlogger-tool-gcc.c:129 the destination passed to that helper is fullPath + 2, but the size
passed down is the full PATH_MAX. safe_strcpy() is strncpy(), which NUL-pads the
destination out to the whole n, so this site writes 4096 bytes into the 4094 that remain — a
2-byte stack overflow on every invocation, independent of the input path's length.
This issue affects CodeChecker: through 6.28.2.10hCVE-2026-58107——
———CodeChecker's massStoreRun processing path performs one-shot decompression of attacker-controlled, Base64-encoded zlib data without enforcing a maximum decompressed size.
An authenticated user with permission to store analysis runs can submit a highly compressed payload that expands to a significantly larger byte sequence. Because the entire decompressed output is materialized in memory before being written to a temporary file, a sufficiently large payload may exhaust process or host memory and consume substantial disk space, resulting in denial of service.10hCVE-2026-50965.3 MED—
———The Everest Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.4. This is due to the `load_previous_field_value()` method in `class-evf-form-task.php` accepting arbitrary URL values from `$_POST` data for upload fields without domain restriction, which are then passed to `wp_remote_head()` in the `get_local_file_size()` method of `class-evf-form-fields-upload.php`. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to force the WordPress server to make outbound HTTP HEAD requests to arbitrary URLs by submitting a form with an upload field containing a malicious URL while leaving a required field empty to trigger form re-rendering.10hCVE-2026-58006.1 MED—
———Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Dayneks Software Industry and Trade Inc. E-Commerce Platform allows Reflected XSS.
This issue affects E-Commerce Platform: through 28082026. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.10hCVE-2026-59347.2 HIG—
———The WP Rocket plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to, and including, 3.21.0.1. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping of user-supplied data via the rocket_beacon AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.10hCVE-2026-59536.1 MED—
———Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Ceviz Informatics Inc. Web Design allows Reflected XSS.
This issue affects Web Design: through 25082026.10hCVE-2026-61767.2 HIG—
———The Customer Reviews for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the aggregated review form submission in versions up to and including 5.106.0. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user-supplied review comment text. The plugin accepts review submissions from unauthenticated users through the 'cr_local_forms_submit' AJAX action without sanitizing HTML content before storing it via wp_insert_comment(), and later renders this stored content on product pages through comment_text() without proper escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers with a valid review form URL (obtainable through review reminder emails sent to customers who placed orders) to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses the affected product page.10hCVE-2026-75758——
———Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in the Elixir standard library allows an attacker who controls a list passed to inspect/1, List.to_string/1, or List.to_charlist/1 to exhaust a BEAM node's memory.
Inspect.List's charlist branch in lib/elixir/lib/inspect.ex classifies a list as a charlist using List.ascii_printable?/2, which examines only the first :printable_limit (4096 by default) elements, and then calls IO.chardata_to_string/1 on the whole term. A list whose printable prefix exceeds that limit but which contains a later element that is not a code point (an atom, an out-of-range integer, or an improper tail) is therefore mis-classified, and the conversion raises ArgumentError. That conversion runs inside List.to_string/1, whose rescue clause builds its message by interpolating inspect(list), which re-enters the same branch and raises again. The nested inspection is an argument to raise, so the recursion is not in tail position and every level is retained: the process stack grows monotonically while each cycle re-walks the list, until the process is killed by max_heap_size or, by default, the node runs out of memory. List.to_charlist/1 has the same rescue shape.
Below the printable limit the inner inspect/1 sees the invalid element within its counter and renders the list in ordinary bracket form, so a single ArgumentError is raised and no recursion occurs.
This issue affects elixir: from 1.15.0-rc.0 before 1.18.5, from 1.19.0-rc.0 before 1.19.6, and from 1.20.0-rc.0 before 1.20.4.10hCVE-2026-810197.4 HIG—
———wolfProvider before 1.2.2 generates the 8-byte explicit AES-GCM nonce once when the TLS write key is set and never increments it per record. As a result every TLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.2 AES-GCM record within a connection is encrypted under an identical key and nonce pair. Reusing a GCM key and nonce discloses the keystream (the XOR of two ciphertexts equals the XOR of their plaintexts, so one known record recovers the others) and leaks the GHASH authentication key, enabling authentication tag forgery. AES-CCM, TLS 1.3, and non-TLS use of the cipher are not affected.10hCVE-2026-822817.4 HIG—
———Kotaemon through 0.12.0 fails to properly validate conversation ownership in select_conv, delete_conv, rename_conv, and on_set_public_conversation functions in control.py. Attackers can read other users' chat histories, delete conversations, or rename conversations by supplying arbitrary conversation identifiers without proper authorization checks.10hCVE-2026-810207.4 HIG—
———wolfEngine before 1.4.1 generates the 8-byte explicit AES-GCM nonce once when the TLS write key is set and never increments it per record. As a result every TLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.2 AES-GCM record within a connection is encrypted under an identical key and nonce pair. Reusing a GCM key and nonce discloses the keystream (the XOR of two ciphertexts equals the XOR of their plaintexts, so one known record recovers the others) and leaks the GHASH authentication key, enabling authentication tag forgery. AES-CCM, TLS 1.3, and non-TLS use of the cipher are not affected.10hCVE-2026-812844.3 MED—
———Contributor Broken Access Control in ACF Extended <= 0.9.2.6 versions.10hCVE-2026-812857.5 HIG—
———Unauthenticated Denial of Service Attack in Smush Image Compression and Optimization <= 4.2.0 versions.10hCVE-2026-812994.3 MED—
———Subscriber Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in WP Job Portal <= 2.5.9 versions.10hCVE-2026-813416.5 MED—
———wolfEngine before 1.4.1 sources the explicit AES-CCM nonce for TLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.2 records from the record input buffer instead of the TLS sequence number carried in the additional authenticated data. Because the record layer leaves the explicit-nonce field for the cipher to populate, the value read is constant across records, so every AES-CCM record within a connection is encrypted under an identical key and nonce pair. Reusing a CCM key and nonce weakens confidentiality (identical keystream across records, so a known record recovers the others) and integrity (authentication tag forgery). Only wolfEngine is affected; wolfProvider is not. AES-GCM under wolfEngine is tracked separately. AES-CCM cipher suites are not enabled by default and must be explicitly selected, which limits exposure. TLS 1.3 and non-TLS use of the cipher are not affected.10hCVE-2026-81578——
———An improper access control vulnerability exists in the web management interface of PaperCut MF and PaperCut NG. Under specific conditions, unauthenticated remote requests targeting administrative functions can trigger backend actions prior to the completion of access validation checks. This allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to modify certain system configurations.10hCVE-2026-817577.2 HIG—
———Author Remote Code Execution (RCE) in Rank Math SEO <= 1.0.276 versions.10hCVE-2026-817595.4 MED—
———Contributor Broken Access Control in WpEvently <= 5.5.0 versions.10hCVE-2026-817607.1 HIG—
———Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Crocoblock JetEngine allows Reflected XSS.
This issue affects JetEngine: from n/a through 3.8.14.2.10hCVE-2026-817614.3 MED—
———Subscriber Broken Access Control in WpEvently <= 5.5.0 versions.10hCVE-2026-817677.5 HIG—
———Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Simple Payment <= 2.5.2 versions.10hCVE-2026-82078——
———An unsafe dynamic class loading vulnerability exists in the database connection utilities of PaperCut MF and PaperCut NG. The application instantiates database driver classes based on configurable driver names without validating against an allowlist of approved drivers. If an attacker can manipulate system configuration parameters, this enables the execution of arbitrary Java bytecode residing on the application classpath under the security context of the PaperCut server process.10hCVE-2026-821123.5 LOW—
———A flaw has been found in houtini-ai houtini-lm up to 2.13.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file src/index.ts of the component code_task_files. Executing a manipulation can lead to path traversal. The attack can be launched remotely. This patch is called 35d97bca0531894da36a85aedb95312da1bd5b7a. It is best practice to apply a patch to resolve this issue.10hCVE-2026-821815.5 MED—
———Medical Practice Management System developed by Le-yan has a Sensitive Data in URL vulnerability. Unauthenticated remote attackers can obtain sensitive information via victim's browser history or log files.10h