Vulnerabilities exploitable today
367,144in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,685
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,629
Distribution · last window
- Critical2,256
- High9,258
- Medium5,266
- Low507
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-80227——
——0Incorrect Comparison vulnerability in ash-project ash_sql allows a user to pad a string field with tab, newline, carriage-return, or form-feed characters and pass a trimmed uniqueness or equality check in the database that the same expression would fail in memory (or the reverse).
string_trim/1 compiles to REGEXP_REPLACE patterns built from an Elixir string in which \s is the escape for a single space (codepoint 32), not a regex whitespace class. The generated SQL therefore removes only literal spaces and leaves tabs, newlines, carriage returns, and form feeds in place, whereas String.trim/1 in Elixir removes them all. Any Ash filter, validation, or identity that relies on string_trim/1 then behaves differently depending on whether Ash pushes the expression down to SQL or evaluates it in memory, so padded input can register a near-duplicate value or slip past a trimmed comparison.
This issue affects ash_sql: from 0.1.0 before 0.7.1.1dCVE-2020-37262——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected.20dCVE-2026-78038——
——0Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes vulnerability in ash-project ash_oban allows a user whose input reaches the :args option of AshOban.build_trigger/3 to retarget an update or destroy trigger at another record, including across tenants.
build_trigger/3 builds the trusted job arguments with atom keys (:primary_key, :tenant, :action_arguments) and merges the caller's :args underneath so the trusted values win on collision. Because Oban job arguments round-trip through JSON, the caller's keys arrive as strings, so Map.merge sees no collision and both keys survive. When the job is persisted the JSON object is de-duplicated keeping the last (string) key, and the worker reads the caller's value. The documentation describes :args as unable to affect the action, so an application that forwards user input into it for uniqueness scoping is exposed to authorization bypass and tenant isolation breaks.
This issue affects ash_oban: from 0.2.5 before 0.8.14.1dCVE-2026-825505.3 MED—
——0A security flaw has been discovered in Linux Foundation Magma 1.9.0. This impacts an unknown function of the component NGSetupRequest Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument NG-IoT-DefaultPagingDRX results in improper input validation. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.21hCVE-2026-826418.6 HIG—
——0keploy versions 3.1.0 through 3.6.25 bind the agent control-plane HTTP server to all interfaces without authentication, exposing endpoints that stream TLS session keys and traffic data. Attackers can access the /agent/pcap/keylog endpoint to retrieve NSS keylog lines and decrypt recorded TLS traffic, or invoke /agent/stop and /agent/storemocks to manipulate recording sessions.23hCVE-2026-826405.5 MED—
——0browser-use web-ui versions 2.0.0 through 3.0.0 write configured LLM API keys to disk in cleartext without encryption or access restrictions. Attackers with read access to the temporary settings directory can recover provider API keys from predictably-named JSON files.23hCVE-2026-826397.5 HIG—
——0NextChat versions from 2.15.8 through 2.16.1 contain an improper URL validation vulnerability in the proxy endpoint that allows attackers to obtain the server's OpenAI API key. The x-base-url header is validated using substring matching instead of hostname parsing, allowing any URL containing 'api.openai.com' to pass validation and receive the server's credentials in the Authorization header.23hCVE-2026-43636——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.45dCVE-2026-26229——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.21dCVE-2026-826375.3 MED—
——0browser-use web-ui versions 2.0.0 through 3.0.0 fail to validate browser settings paths in run_agent_task, allowing attackers to create directories at arbitrary locations by supplying absolute paths to save_recording_path, save_trace_path, save_agent_history_path, or save_download_path parameters. Attackers can exploit this via the unauthenticated Gradio interface to create directories anywhere the root-running container has write access.23hCVE-2026-825444.3 MED—
——0A flaw has been found in wger-project wger up to 2.6.0-alpha2. This issue affects the function reset_user_password of the file wger/gym/views/gym.py of the component Password Reset. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. This patch is called 3c6ce4b7f3eeafeb35318c6c4e82b1a3fd28b314. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.23hCVE-2022-33724—0.0%
——0——CVE-2026-51238——
——0Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.31dCVE-2026-62421——
——0Rejected reason: Voluntarily withdrawn19dCVE-2025-20801—0.0%
——0——CVE-2026-826358.8 HIG—
——0Pake before 3.13.1 joins the JavaScript-supplied filename for the download_file Tauri command onto the user's Downloads directory with no sanitization. A filename containing path traversal sequences (for example ../Library/LaunchAgents/com.evil.plist) or an absolute path resolves outside ~/Downloads. The command then fetches attacker-controlled content from the supplied URL (via Rust HTTP, not the browser) and writes it to that path. A script that can invoke the command can overwrite user-writable files and install persistence (macOS LaunchAgents, Linux autostart, Windows Startup), leading to code execution in the user account. All desktop apps generated from an affected Pake tree expose the same command.1dCVE-2026-243497.1 HIG0.0%
——0A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V16 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V17 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V18 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V19 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V20 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V21 (All versions < V21 Update 2). Insufficient protection of key material in WinCC Certificate Manager that could allow an attacker to extract sensitive information.39dCVE-2026-826346.5 MED—
——0Frappe Framework development builds contain an authorization flaw in the render_jinja_template endpoint that allows low-privileged users to render arbitrary Jinja templates by supplying raw template strings. Attackers with print permission on any document can execute arbitrary SELECT statements against unrelated tables, including reading password hashes from the __Auth table.1dCVE-2026-826334.3 MED—
——0Dolibarr versions 10.0.0 before 24.0.0 fail to perform per-object authorization checks in the Users::getGroups REST API endpoint, allowing authenticated users to retrieve group memberships of other users. Attackers can call GET /users/{id}/groups with arbitrary user identifiers to access group names, entity associations, and private notes across tenant boundaries.1dCVE-2026-825437.3 HIG—
——0A vulnerability was detected in vastsa FileCodeBox up to 2.3. This vulnerability affects the function update_file_usage of the file apps/base/views.py of the component Pickup Limit Handler. Performing a manipulation results in race condition. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 2.5.0 is able to resolve this issue. The patch is named 8d7d856c62d73badd0797eb4daec8d2ff10a403a. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.1dCVE-2026-198546.1 MED0.0%
——0When the ClickHouse plugin uses Native protocol (the default) with PDC or secure SOCKS, it asks for TLS but the connection library ignores that and talks to ClickHouse in the clear. Username, password, queries, and results can be read on the hop after the proxy. The server certificate is never checked, and a configured client certificate is not sent.4dCVE-2026-28549—0.0%
——0——CVE-2026-81316——
——0Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_sql allows a caller to receive an aggregate value computed over rows a more restrictive filter should have excluded, disclosing counts, sums, or lists across an authorization or tenancy boundary.
AshSql.Aggregate.different_queries?/2 reports two aggregate queries as different only when their filter and their sort both differ. Aggregate queries rarely carry a sort, so two aggregates that share a name but carry entirely different filters compare as identical. The colliding aggregate keeps its name and is treated as already computed, and select_aggregates returns the first-registered variant's value. The same name reaches the builder twice with different filters when actor or tenant context is stamped into each aggregate's query, so a narrowly filtered aggregate can be served the value of a previously registered broad one.
This issue affects ash_sql: from 0.1.0 before 0.7.1.1dCVE-2023-36491——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused4dCVE-2026-81318——
——0Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_sql allows a caller in a schema-based multitenant application to receive aggregate values computed from another tenant's rows.
When an aggregate is computed over a distinct query, AshSql.AggregateQuery.add_single_aggs/5 rebuilds the outer query from query.from.source alone, which is only the {table, schema} tuple and does not carry query.prefix or query.from.prefix. For strategy(:context) multitenancy those hold the tenant schema, so the rebuilt outer query reads the repo's default schema while the inner correlated subquery still reads the tenant schema, and the two are joined only on primary key. The aggregate, and any relationship join added off the prefix-less binding, is then computed against the wrong tenant's rows. The neighbouring limit and exists branches instead wrap the query with subquery/1, which preserves the prefix.
This issue affects ash_sql: from 0.1.0 before 0.7.1.1dCVE-2026-825416.3 MED—
——0A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Sales and Inventory System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /pages/sup_edit.php. The manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.1dCVE-2026-40512——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.21dCVE-2026-826538.9 HIG—
——0SiYuan before v3.8.1 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in confirmDialog() where unescaped package names and notebook names are interpolated directly into innerHTML assignments. Attackers can submit malicious bazaar packages with HTML/script payloads in the name field that execute in users' browsers when uninstalling packages or unlocking encrypted notebooks.22hCVE-2023-7353——
——0Rejected reason: Erroneously reserved under wrong year by automation defect; never assigned.25dCVE-2026-68577——
——0Rejected reason: Reserved via standalone CLI outside the OSIM flaw workflow; releasing so the CVE ID can be properly reserved and linked through OSIM when the flaw is worked.31dCVE-2026-62175——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-60091. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-60091. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-60091 instead of this candidate.47dCVE-2026-81322——
——0Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in ash-project ash_cloak allows anyone with access to logs, error trackers, or crash reports, or anyone who can trigger a validation error, to recover the plaintext of a field the library encrypts.
AshCloak.Transformers.SetUpEncryption removes each cloaked attribute from the action's accept list and adds an action argument that carries the plaintext into the encryption change. That argument is built with sensitive?: attr.sensitive?, inheriting the flag from the source attribute, so a cloaked attribute declared without sensitive? true produces a non-sensitive argument. It is the only place the cleartext value lives, and the one place Ash will not redact: it appears verbatim in inspect(changeset), Ash.Error.Invalid and validation error messages, telemetry, :sys dumps, and error-tracker payloads. The generated encrypted attribute and decrypt calculation are already hardcoded sensitive.
This issue affects ash_cloak: from 0.1.0 before 0.4.0.19hCVE-2024-583795.3 MED—
——0nodemailer before 6.9.9 contains a regular expression denial of service vulnerability in email parsing when attachDataUrls parameter is set or processing embedded file attachments. Attackers can send specially crafted emails with malicious data URLs or embedded attachments to cause the event loop to hang and deny service.4hCVE-2023-54373——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected.20dCVE-2026-826808.8 HIG—
——0A weakness has been identified in D-Link DSM-G600 1.01. This affects an unknown function of the file /load_file.cgi of the component Multipart Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to out-of-bounds write. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.2hCVE-2026-49946——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.54dCVE-2026-826889.1 CRI—
——0A security vulnerability has been detected in D-Link DNS-340L and DNS-345 1.01B04/1.03B06/1.04.B02/1.05b04. This impacts an unknown function of the file /cgi-bin/virtual_vol.cgi of the component Virtual Volume Handler. The manipulation of the argument f_sharename/f_target/f_name leads to os command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.2hCVE-2023-46709——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused4dCVE-2026-8717——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.11dCVE-2026-73111——
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.13d