PULSE
FEED
vulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-93952 — Arista / VeloCloud OrchestratorvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-94127 — F5 / BIG-IP APMvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-93616 — Check Point / Multiple ProductsvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-85102 — Check Point / Multiple ProductsvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-7273 — Zyxel / GS1900 Series SwitchesvulnKEV agrega CVE-2025-39964 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-53266 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2025-39682 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-58704 — Google / PixelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-76460 — Cisco / Identity Services EnginevulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-87886 — Acronis / BackupvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-76461 — Cisco / Secure Email GatewayvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-84869 — ConnectWise / ScreenConnectvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-42016 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-93952 — Arista / VeloCloud OrchestratorvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-94127 — F5 / BIG-IP APMvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-93616 — Check Point / Multiple ProductsvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-85102 — Check Point / Multiple ProductsvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-7273 — Zyxel / GS1900 Series SwitchesvulnKEV agrega CVE-2025-39964 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-53266 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2025-39682 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-58704 — Google / PixelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-76460 — Cisco / Identity Services EnginevulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-87886 — Acronis / BackupvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-76461 — Cisco / Secure Email GatewayvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-84869 — ConnectWise / ScreenConnectvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-42016 — JFrog / Artifactory
CVE Watch380,233 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

380,233in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,721
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,640

Distribution · last window

  • Critical
    2,265
  • High
    8,376
  • Medium
    6,848
  • Low
    754
Filters
Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities379,601–379,640 · 380,233
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2023-47205—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused29d
CVE-2020-37262—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected.45d
CVE-2026-29025—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.46d
CVE-2026-66280—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.4d
CVE-2023-54378—
—
——0Rejected reason: Erroneously reserved under wrong year by automation defect; superseded by correct-year CVE.51d
CVE-2026-51277—
—
——0Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.56d
CVE-2023-22364—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused29d
CVE-2023-36856—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused29d
CVE-2022-51001—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected.29d
CVE-2013-1446—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. Was assigned for an old issue in the brltty daemon and never published completely.11d
CVE-2026-51264—
—
——0Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.56d
CVE-2026-17590—
—
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-32475. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2026-32475. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-32475 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.37d
CVE-2026-15799—
—
——0Rejected reason: This is a duplicate.60d
CVE-2023-35063—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused29d
CVE-2025-13398—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID is a duplicate of CVE-2025-13542 and was never published. Both IDs were assigned to the same unauthenticated privilege escalation vulnerability in the DesignThemes LMS WordPress plugin. All CVE users should reference CVE-2025-13542 instead of this ID.23d
CVE-2019-25725—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.35d
CVE-2026-63726—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.35d
CVE-2023-35770—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused29d
CVE-2023-49592—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused29d
CVE-2026-35026—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.46d
CVE-2026-43645—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.16d
CVE-2023-22420—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused29d
CVE-2023-54369—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected.45d
CVE-2026-23692—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.46d
CVE-2023-35000—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused29d
CVE-2026-49030—
—
——0Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.12d
CVE-2025-47407—
0.0%
——0——
CVE-2025-32084—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused44d
CVE-2026-76829—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.32d
CVE-2023-23544—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused29d
CVE-2026-76831—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.32d
CVE-2026-61692—
—
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61454. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61454. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61454 instead of this candidate.74d
CVE-2020-37259—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected.45d
CVE-2026-146814.2 MED
0.0%
——0Improper enforcement of message integrity in PostgreSQL GSSAPI support allows a user to negotiate GSSAPI contrary to pg_hba.conf rules, via initial direct TLS connection. Despite a pg_hba.conf that appears to require GSSAPI, the connection may exchange data over TLS encryption alone. If the TLS settings are more permissive than the GSS settings, the connection may continue with lesser protection. Within major versions 17-18, minor versions before PostgreSQL 18.6 and 17.11 are affected. Versions before PostgreSQL 17 are unaffected.27d
CVE-2026-62248—
—
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61438. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61438. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61438 instead of this candidate.72d
CVE-2023-54367—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected.45d
CVE-2026-11902—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.35d
CVE-2026-74226—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.37d
CVE-2023-45216—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority because it is Unused29d
CVE-2026-76069—
—
——0Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.35d