PULSE
FEED
ransomincransom reclama a chicagolawyer.com · US · Professional Servicesransomeverstake reclama a sp*****g.comransomsilentransomgroup reclama a ArentFox Schiff · US · Professional Servicesransomemperador reclama a Studio Stelitano e Associati · IT · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Acclaim Companies / JCJ Investment · US · Financial Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Gilliam & Associates, P.C · US · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Facts N Figures · US · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Illinois Work Injury Resource Center (IWIRC) · US · Healthcareransomgenesis reclama a Psychometrics Canada · CA · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Louisiana Crane & Construction · US · Manufacturingransomgenesis reclama a Aliqout Association · USransomgenesis reclama a EAS Engineering · US · Manufacturingransomgenesis reclama a Fred H Beck & Associates · US · Professional Servicesransomwhitearmor reclama a KTU Shipyard · PH · Transportationransomincransom reclama a chicagolawyer.com · US · Professional Servicesransomeverstake reclama a sp*****g.comransomsilentransomgroup reclama a ArentFox Schiff · US · Professional Servicesransomemperador reclama a Studio Stelitano e Associati · IT · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Acclaim Companies / JCJ Investment · US · Financial Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Gilliam & Associates, P.C · US · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Facts N Figures · US · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Illinois Work Injury Resource Center (IWIRC) · US · Healthcareransomgenesis reclama a Psychometrics Canada · CA · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Louisiana Crane & Construction · US · Manufacturingransomgenesis reclama a Aliqout Association · USransomgenesis reclama a EAS Engineering · US · Manufacturingransomgenesis reclama a Fred H Beck & Associates · US · Professional Servicesransomwhitearmor reclama a KTU Shipyard · PH · Transportation
CVE Watch406,106 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

406,106in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,764
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,697

Distribution · last window

  • Critical
    5,625
  • High
    21,851
  • Medium
    20,390
  • Low
    2,121
Filters
Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities381,001–381,040 · 406,106
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-118010—
4.2%
——1Use-after-free in the Disability Access APIs component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 159 and Thunderbird 159.3d
CVE-2025-124126.1 MED
4.2%
——1The Top Bar Notification plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.12. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on th tbn_ajax_add() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.12d
CVE-2026-118015—
4.2%
——1Use-after-free in the DOM: Core & HTML component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 159 and Thunderbird 159.3d
CVE-2025-139874.3 MED
4.2%
——1The Purchase and Expense Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'sup_pt_handle_deletion' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary purchase records via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.23d
CVE-2025-28900—
4.2%
——1——
CVE-2025-28901—
4.2%
——1——
CVE-2026-150035.6 MED
4.2%
——1A flaw was found in the GNU Binutils (Binary Utilities) linker. This vulnerability, a heap-buffer-overflow read (CWE-125), occurs when the linker processes a specially crafted 32-bit XCOFF (Extended Common Object File Format) object file. An attacker could exploit this by providing a malicious file, leading to an out-of-bounds read of memory. This can result in information disclosure, potentially revealing sensitive heap data, and a Denial of Service (DoS) due to the linker crashing.60d
CVE-2026-40489—
4.2%
——1editorconfig-core-c is an EditorConfig core library for use by plugins supporting EditorConfig parsing. Versions up to and including 0.12.10 have a stack-based buffer overflow in ec_glob() that allows an attacker to crash any application using libeditorconfig by providing a specially crafted directory structure and .editorconfig file. This is an incomplete fix for CVE-2023-0341. The pcre_str buffer was protected in 0.12.6 but the adjacent l_pattern[8194] stack buffer received no equivalent protection. On Ubuntu 24.04, FORTIFY_SOURCE converts the overflow to SIGABRT (DoS). Version 0.12.11 contains an updated fix.4d
CVE-2025-123734.3 MED
4.2%
——1The Torod – The smart shipping and delivery portal for e-shops and retailers plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_settings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.13d
CVE-2026-880146.3 MED
4.2%
——1rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. From 1.72.0 until 1.75.1, the archive ZIP backend method (*Fs).readZip in backend/archive/zip/zip.go accepts archive/zip.File.Name values from an untrusted central directory and exposes cleaned entry names without ensuring that they remain inside the archive namespace. Entries such as ../../etc/cron.d/evil can survive path.Clean and become Object.Remote() values that fs/sync and fs/operations use as destination-relative paths, allowing rclone copy or sync to write outside the selected destination on backends that do not independently confine the path. The non-empty root check also used strings.HasPrefix without a path boundary, so root foo could incorrectly include sibling foobar entries. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.37d
CVE-2017-11067—
4.2%
——1——
CVE-2025-4095—
4.2%
——1——
CVE-2025-397767.0 HIG
4.2%
——1In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/debug_vm_pgtable: clear page table entries at destroy_args() The mm/debug_vm_pagetable test allocates manually page table entries for the tests it runs, using also its manually allocated mm_struct. That in itself is ok, but when it exits, at destroy_args() it fails to clear those entries with the *_clear functions. The problem is that leaves stale entries. If another process allocates an mm_struct with a pgd at the same address, it may end up running into the stale entry. This is happening in practice on a debug kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE=y, for example this is the output with some extra debugging I added (it prints a warning trace if pgtables_bytes goes negative, in addition to the warning at check_mm() function): [ 2.539353] debug_vm_pgtable: [get_random_vaddr ]: random_vaddr is 0x7ea247140000 [ 2.539366] kmem_cache info [ 2.539374] kmem_cachep 0x000000002ce82385 - freelist 0x0000000000000000 - offset 0x508 [ 2.539447] debug_vm_pgtable: [init_args ]: args->mm is 0x000000002267cc9e (...) [ 2.552800] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 116 at include/linux/mm.h:2841 free_pud_range+0x8bc/0x8d0 [ 2.552816] Modules linked in: [ 2.552843] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 116 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.12.0-105.debug_vm2.el10.ppc64le+debug #1 VOLUNTARY [ 2.552859] Hardware name: IBM,9009-41A POWER9 (architected) 0x4e0202 0xf000005 of:IBM,FW910.00 (VL910_062) hv:phyp pSeries [ 2.552872] NIP: c0000000007eef3c LR: c0000000007eef30 CTR: c0000000003d8c90 [ 2.552885] REGS: c0000000622e73b0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (6.12.0-105.debug_vm2.el10.ppc64le+debug) [ 2.552899] MSR: 800000000282b033 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 24002822 XER: 0000000a [ 2.552954] CFAR: c0000000008f03f0 IRQMASK: 0 [ 2.552954] GPR00: c0000000007eef30 c0000000622e7650 c000000002b1ac00 0000000000000001 [ 2.552954] GPR04: 0000000000000008 0000000000000000 c0000000007eef30 ffffffffffffffff [ 2.552954] GPR08: 00000000ffff00f5 0000000000000001 0000000000000048 0000000000004000 [ 2.552954] GPR12: 00000003fa440000 c000000017ffa300 c0000000051d9f80 ffffffffffffffdb [ 2.552954] GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000008 000000000000000a 60000000000000e0 [ 2.552954] GPR20: 4080000000000000 c0000000113af038 00007fffcf130000 0000700000000000 [ 2.552954] GPR24: c000000062a6a000 0000000000000001 8000000062a68000 0000000000000001 [ 2.552954] GPR28: 000000000000000a c000000062ebc600 0000000000002000 c000000062ebc760 [ 2.553170] NIP [c0000000007eef3c] free_pud_range+0x8bc/0x8d0 [ 2.553185] LR [c0000000007eef30] free_pud_range+0x8b0/0x8d0 [ 2.553199] Call Trace: [ 2.553207] [c0000000622e7650] [c0000000007eef30] free_pud_range+0x8b0/0x8d0 (unreliable) [ 2.553229] [c0000000622e7750] [c0000000007f40b4] free_pgd_range+0x284/0x3b0 [ 2.553248] [c0000000622e7800] [c0000000007f4630] free_pgtables+0x450/0x570 [ 2.553274] [c0000000622e78e0] [c0000000008161c0] exit_mmap+0x250/0x650 [ 2.553292] [c0000000622e7a30] [c0000000001b95b8] __mmput+0x98/0x290 [ 2.558344] [c0000000622e7a80] [c0000000001d1018] exit_mm+0x118/0x1b0 [ 2.558361] [c0000000622e7ac0] [c0000000001d141c] do_exit+0x2ec/0x870 [ 2.558376] [c0000000622e7b60] [c0000000001d1ca8] do_group_exit+0x88/0x150 [ 2.558391] [c0000000622e7bb0] [c0000000001d1db8] sys_exit_group+0x48/0x50 [ 2.558407] [c0000000622e7be0] [c00000000003d810] system_call_exception+0x1e0/0x4c0 [ 2.558423] [c0000000622e7e50] [c00000000000d05c] system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec (...) [ 2.558892] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 2.559022] BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:000000002267cc9e type:MM_ANONPAGES val:1 [ 2.559037] BUG: non-zero pgtables_bytes on freeing mm: -6144 Here the modprobe process ended up with an allocated mm_struct from the mm_struct slab that was used before by the debug_vm_pgtable test. That is not a problem, since the mm_stru ---truncated---11d
CVE-2018-1518—
4.2%
——1——
CVE-2025-9881—
4.2%
——1——
CVE-2025-626887.1 HIG
4.2%
——1An incorrect permission assignment for a critical resource vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an attacker with low-privileged credentials to change their role, gaining full control access to the project.12d
CVE-2025-43835—
4.2%
——1——
CVE-2026-883415.5 MED
4.2%
——1A reachable assertion vulnerability exists in YARA 4.5.8 when loading crafted .yrc compiled rule files. An attacker can provide a malicious file with an invalid arena configuration (num_buffers=0) that triggers an assertion failure in yr_arena_get_ptr(), causing the application to terminate.36d
CVE-2025-28925—
4.2%
——1——
CVE-2025-28922—
4.2%
——1——
CVE-2026-1019344.4 MED
4.2%
——1An Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in eventd of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a local attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via sending a crafted packet to the eventd relay service.16d
CVE-2026-869445.5 MED
4.2%
——1An out-of-bounds write issue was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7 and iPadOS 26.7, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An app may be able to cause unexpected system termination.10h
CVE-2025-133664.3 MED
4.2%
——1The Rabbit Hole plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the plugin's reset functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. The vulnerability is exacerbated by the fact that the reset operation is performed via a GET request, making exploitation trivial via image tags or hyperlinks.23d
CVE-2025-14164—
4.2%
——1——
CVE-2026-606627.8 HIG
4.2%
——1Vulnerability in the Oracle Solaris product of Oracle Systems (component: Services). The supported version that is affected is 11.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Solaris executes to compromise Oracle Solaris. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Solaris. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).4d
CVE-2025-141624.3 MED
4.2%
——1The BMLT WordPress Plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.11.4. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'BMLTPlugin_create_option' and 'BMLTPlugin_delete_option ' action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.23d
CVE-2026-933043.7 LOW
4.2%
——1A (D)TLS 1.2 client can accept a ChangeCipherSpec message before it has sent its ClientKeyExchange. No master secret has been derived at that point, so the client installs read keys derived from a known (deterministic) key and checks the server's Finished against that same key. An out-of-order ChangeCipherSpec can therefore be used by an attacker to complete the handshake in place of the server and send data the client accepts as authentic. The client's own traffic still uses correctly derived keys, so the attacker cannot read it, and the genuine server never completes the handshake. DTLS 1.2 clients are exposed because a datagram read can deliver the out-of-order records on its own. TLS 1.2 clients are exposed when the application supplies received bytes with wolfSSL_inject() or enables read ahead. For certificate suites, the attacker must be in a man-in-the-middle position. For PSK (Pre Shared Key) connections, any fake server can succeed without knowing the PSK.28d
CVE-2025-48265—
4.2%
——1——
CVE-2026-23719—
4.2%
——1——
CVE-2026-557429.6 CRI
4.2%
——1Cotonti 1.0.0 (master branch, commit f43f1fc3) is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in the administration rights handler. In system/admin/admin.rights.php, the rights update action ('a=update') modifies group access rights (including via cot_auth_add_group) without calling cot_check_xg to validate the anti-CSRF token.82d
CVE-2026-1377—
4.2%
——1——
CVE-2019-25368—
4.2%
——1——
CVE-2025-200506.7 MED
4.2%
——1Uncontrolled search path for some Intel(R) CIP software before version WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a high complexity attack may enable local code execution. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires active user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.12d
CVE-2024-219237.3 HIG
4.2%
——1Incorrect default permissions in AMD StoreMI™ could allow an attacker to achieve privilege escalation potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution.34d
CVE-2026-20603—
4.2%
——1——
CVE-2025-31648—
4.2%
——1——
CVE-2025-28931—
4.2%
——1——
CVE-2024-219227.3 HIG
4.2%
——1A DLL hijacking vulnerability in AMD StoreMI™ could allow an attacker to achieve privilege escalation, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution.34d
CVE-2024-36320—
4.2%
——1——
CVE-2017-9687—
4.2%
——1——