PULSE
FEED
ransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Morrison Cohen · US · Professional Servicesransomemperador reclama a Afflelou · FR · Retail & E-Commerceransombyod reclama a University of New Mexico · US · Educationransomrhysida reclama a MISC Group · MY · Energy & Utilitiesransomn0n reclama a Ingelectus Innovative Electrical Solutions S.L. · ES · Energy & Utilitiesransomwhitearmor reclama a Gamdom · Otherransomfalcon reclama a Beasley Allen Law Firm · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a RaceTrakka · AU · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Smith Feddeler & Smith · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Delta Electric Power Association · US · Energy & Utilitiesransomqilin reclama a Bangor Wholesale Laminates · GB · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a TeleTronic · ES · Technologyransomqilin reclama a FIRMENGRUPPE APPL Holding GmbH · DE · Otherransomqilin reclama a Premier Medical Group · US · Healthcareransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Morrison Cohen · US · Professional Servicesransomemperador reclama a Afflelou · FR · Retail & E-Commerceransombyod reclama a University of New Mexico · US · Educationransomrhysida reclama a MISC Group · MY · Energy & Utilitiesransomn0n reclama a Ingelectus Innovative Electrical Solutions S.L. · ES · Energy & Utilitiesransomwhitearmor reclama a Gamdom · Otherransomfalcon reclama a Beasley Allen Law Firm · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a RaceTrakka · AU · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Smith Feddeler & Smith · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Delta Electric Power Association · US · Energy & Utilitiesransomqilin reclama a Bangor Wholesale Laminates · GB · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a TeleTronic · ES · Technologyransomqilin reclama a FIRMENGRUPPE APPL Holding GmbH · DE · Otherransomqilin reclama a Premier Medical Group · US · Healthcare
CVE Watch403,426 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

403,426in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,756
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,689

Distribution · last window

  • Critical
    5,556
  • High
    21,532
  • Medium
    19,934
  • Low
    2,099
Filters
Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities384,921–384,960 · 403,426
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-446382.5 LOW
2.7%
——1libsixel is a SIXEL encoder/decoder implementation derived from kmiya's sixel. From to 1.8.7-r1, a wrong NULL check after an allocation call in sixel_decode_raw and sixel_decode causes a NULL pointer dereference whenever the allocation fails. The check tests the address of the output parameter (always non-NULL) instead of the value the malloc returned. On allocation failure, the function continues and writes through a NULL pointer, crashing the process. This is a denial of service against any caller of these public APIs that hits a low-memory condition. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.7-r2.14h
CVE-2025-54618—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2025-621034.3 MED
2.7%
——1Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wpmediadownload Media Library File Download media-download allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Media Library File Download: from n/a through <= 1.4.19d
CVE-2026-917884.7 MED
2.7%
——1When implementing the JavaScript interface, Foxit PDF Editor/Reader did not perform the attribute authorization checks required by the specification. As a result, a trusted malicious PDF could potentially access sensitive content from other documents within the same process and transmit it externally.33d
CVE-2025-630124.3 MED
2.7%
——1Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThimPress WP Hotel Booking wp-hotel-booking allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Hotel Booking: from n/a through <= 2.2.8.19d
CVE-2025-642394.3 MED
2.7%
——1Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Yoav Farhi RTL Tester rtl-tester allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects RTL Tester: from n/a through <= 1.2.19d
CVE-2025-20996—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2025-676254.3 MED
2.7%
——1Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in tmtraderunner Trade Runner traderunner allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Trade Runner: from n/a through <= 3.14.20d
CVE-2026-287336.5 MED
2.7%
——1in OpenHarmony v6.0 and prior versions allow a local attacker arbitrary code execution.95d
CVE-2025-485667.8 HIG
2.7%
——1In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.19d
CVE-2025-52790—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2025-685834.3 MED
2.7%
——1Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tikweb Management Fast User Switching fast-user-switching allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Fast User Switching: from n/a through <= 1.4.10.20d
CVE-2026-22462—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2023-38541—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2025-674734.3 MED
2.7%
——1Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in codeworkweb CWW Companion cww-companion allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects CWW Companion: from n/a through <= 1.3.2.19d
CVE-2025-36058—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2022-39093—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2022-42777—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2026-27813—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2025-628664.3 MED
2.7%
——1Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Valerio Monti Auto Alt Text auto-alt-text allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Auto Alt Text: from n/a through <= 2.5.2.19d
CVE-2025-627624.3 MED
2.7%
——1Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in photoboxone SMTP Mail smtp-mail allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects SMTP Mail: from n/a through <= 1.3.51.19d
CVE-2024-1343—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2023-53591—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2026-149713.9 LOW
2.7%
——1IBM PowerVM Novalink 2.2.02.2.12.2.1.1, and 2.3.02.3.0.12.3.12.3.2 IBM NovaLink APIs misconfiguration may increase attack surface and enable unintended or unauthorized operations under non-default conditions.2d
CVE-2025-69644—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2017-13318—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2026-287618.1 HIG
2.7%
——1Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Musetheque V4 Information Disclosure for IPKNOWLEDGE V4L1 rev2203.0 and earlier. If a user views a malicious page while logged-in to the affected product, unexpected operations may be done.1d
CVE-2026-601495.2 MED
2.7%
——1Vulnerability in the Oracle Workflow product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Workflow Notification Mailer). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Workflow executes to compromise Oracle Workflow. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle Workflow as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Workflow accessible data and unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Workflow accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H).2d
CVE-2023-22675—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2022-48518—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2026-46203—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2025-53331—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2025-49425—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2025-52781—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2026-53166—
2.7%
——1Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.11d
CVE-2026-180963.3 LOW
2.7%
——1IBM Db2 12.1.5 for Linux, UNIX and Windows (includes DB2 Connect Server) could allow a local attacker to cause a denial of service due to a memory leak.3d
CVE-2025-685804.3 MED
2.7%
——1Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in pluginsware Advanced Classifieds & Directory Pro advanced-classifieds-and-directory-pro allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Advanced Classifieds & Directory Pro: from n/a through <= 3.2.9.20d
CVE-2026-458947.8 HIG
2.7%
——1In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iommu/vt-d: Clear Present bit before tearing down PASID entry The Intel VT-d Scalable Mode PASID table entry consists of 512 bits (64 bytes). When tearing down an entry, the current implementation zeros the entire 64-byte structure immediately using multiple 64-bit writes. Since the IOMMU hardware may fetch these 64 bytes using multiple internal transactions (e.g., four 128-bit bursts), updating or zeroing the entire entry while it is active (P=1) risks a "torn" read. If a hardware fetch occurs simultaneously with the CPU zeroing the entry, the hardware could observe an inconsistent state, leading to unpredictable behavior or spurious faults. Follow the "Guidance to Software for Invalidations" in the VT-d spec (Section 6.5.3.3) by implementing the recommended ownership handshake: 1. Clear only the 'Present' (P) bit of the PASID entry. 2. Use a dma_wmb() to ensure the cleared bit is visible to hardware before proceeding. 3. Execute the required invalidation sequence (PASID cache, IOTLB, and Device-TLB flush) to ensure the hardware has released all cached references. 4. Only after the flushes are complete, zero out the remaining fields of the PASID entry. Also, add a dma_wmb() in pasid_set_present() to ensure that all other fields of the PASID entry are visible to the hardware before the Present bit is set.7d
CVE-2020-37101—
2.7%
——1——
CVE-2022-20475—
2.7%
——1——