PULSE
FEED
ransombravox reclama a AMSAM · FR · Not Foundransombravox reclama a Barrow & Grimm · US · Not Foundransomsilentransomgroup reclama a M...r · Not Foundransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Kirkland & Ellis LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomakira reclama a Bethany Press International · Retail & E-Commerceransomakira reclama a Medienwerkstatt · DE · Educationransomakira reclama a Annapath · Not Foundransomrhysida reclama a DR.SCHNELL GmbH & Co. KGaA · DE · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Airtificial · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Bathurst RSL · AU · Hospitalityransomqilin reclama a Creative Universe · AU · Otherransomeverest reclama a PWC · GB · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Performance Ford Inc · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomn0n reclama a Company #109 · Not Foundransombravox reclama a AMSAM · FR · Not Foundransombravox reclama a Barrow & Grimm · US · Not Foundransomsilentransomgroup reclama a M...r · Not Foundransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Kirkland & Ellis LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomakira reclama a Bethany Press International · Retail & E-Commerceransomakira reclama a Medienwerkstatt · DE · Educationransomakira reclama a Annapath · Not Foundransomrhysida reclama a DR.SCHNELL GmbH & Co. KGaA · DE · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Airtificial · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Bathurst RSL · AU · Hospitalityransomqilin reclama a Creative Universe · AU · Otherransomeverest reclama a PWC · GB · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Performance Ford Inc · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomn0n reclama a Company #109 · Not Found
CVE Watch401,677 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

401,677in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,754
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,666

Distribution · last window

  • Critical
    3,401
  • High
    15,535
  • Medium
    14,802
  • Low
    1,423
Filters
Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities390,841–390,880 · 401,677
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-945777.8 HIG
0.8%
——0A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the internal Command-Line Interface (CLI) authorization handling mechanism of Brocade Fabric OS versions before 9.2.2d and 10.0.0 through 10.0.0a1. An authenticated user or local process that can manipulate the process execution environment can bypass Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) validation checks. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to elevate privileges to root8d
CVE-2022-20357—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-234667.8 HIG
0.8%
——0In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/xe: Open-code GGTT MMIO access protection GGTT MMIO access is currently protected by hotplug (drm_dev_enter), which works correctly when the driver loads successfully and is later unbound or unloaded. However, if driver load fails, this protection is insufficient because drm_dev_unplug() is never called. Additionally, devm release functions cannot guarantee that all BOs with GGTT mappings are destroyed before the GGTT MMIO region is removed, as some BOs may be freed asynchronously by worker threads. To address this, introduce an open-coded flag, protected by the GGTT lock, that guards GGTT MMIO access. The flag is cleared during the dev_fini_ggtt devm release function to ensure MMIO access is disabled once teardown begins. (cherry picked from commit 4f3a998a173b4325c2efd90bdadc6ccd3ad9a431)3d
CVE-2026-942875.5 MED
0.8%
——0A denial of service via unsigned underflow in libXpm's write path in libXpm before 3.5.19 could be used by local attackers to cause unbounded CPU usage and memory exhaustion.23d
CVE-2026-1051184.7 MED
0.8%
——0OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an open redirect vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to redirect users by supplying an unverified id_token_hint to the /oauth2/connect/endSession endpoint. Attackers can name any realm client in a forged hint to redirect victims to any registered post-logout URI, enabling phishing that borrows the OpenAM host's trust.16d
CVE-2022-32638—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2020-10845—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2025-53175—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-1099764.7 MED
0.8%
——0A flaw was found in the clevis PKCS#11 pin. The clevis-pkcs11-afunix-socket-unlock daemon crashes when an AF_UNIX client connects to the data socket without a bound address, due to an integer underflow in the getpeername result handling. This causes a denial of service, preventing LUKS disk decryption from completing during boot.7d
CVE-2025-48527—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-174405.5 MED
0.8%
——0IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.1, and 12.0.1.0 through 12.0.12.28 and IBM Integration Bus for z/OS 10.1.0.0 through 10.1.0.7 could allow a local attacker to cause a denial of service due to uncontrolled recursion.43d
CVE-2026-47604—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2023-21040—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2025-20119—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-23393—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-240817.4 HIG
0.8%
——0Transient DOS when processing a channel map with insufficient used channels and adaptive frequency hopping is fully enabled.30d
CVE-2026-869387.3 HIG
0.8%
——0A DLL hijacking vulnerability in the FileMaker Pro installer for Windows allowed a local user to execute arbitrary code with elevated administrator privileges by placing a malicious DLL file in the installer directory. This vulnerability is addressed in FileMaker Pro version 26.0.3.17d
CVE-2025-1351—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-1098385.1 MED
0.8%
——0IBM Db2 Genius Hub 1.0 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper verification of cryptographic signature.6d
CVE-2026-42306—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2025-323317.8 HIG
0.8%
——0In showDismissibleKeyguard of KeyguardService.java, there is a possible way to bypass app pinning due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.22d
CVE-2026-35345—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2025-48520—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2024-42033—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2023-21310—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2023-20753—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-181654.2 MED
0.8%
——0@fastify/oauth2 is an OAuth 2.0 plugin for Fastify. In versions from 7.2.0 up to but not including 8.3.0, the plugin validates the OAuth state, and with PKCE the code verifier, by comparing the callback query parameter against an unprefixed, predictable cookie, with no server-side binding to the browser that began the flow. Any party able to write a cookie for the application's host, such as a sibling subdomain under the same registrable domain, can plant matching state and verifier cookies and complete an attacker-owned OAuth flow inside a victim's browser, silently signing the victim in to the attacker's account (login CSRF). It does not expose the victim's own account, credentials, or tokens. The issue is fixed in @fastify/oauth2 8.3.0, which adds an opt-in hostPrefixedCookies option. Users should upgrade to 8.3.0 and enable it, or bind state to a server-side session.48d
CVE-2025-48519—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-168967.1 HIG
0.8%
——0IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local authenticated attacker to obtain unauthorized access to files due to a time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition.66d
CVE-2026-252817.4 HIG
0.8%
——0Transient DOS when processing large or numerous request buffers without sufficient memory allocation validation.30d
CVE-2023-48411—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2025-27052—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-1075655.1 MED
0.8%
——0A flaw was found in luksmeta. A local attacker with administrative privileges can cause data corruption when saving metadata to a Linux Unified Key Setup (LUKS) device. Due to incorrect boundary calculations and flawed overlap detection, new metadata entries can be written beyond available free space or over existing records. This issue can corrupt stored encrypted payload data or existing metadata, potentially rendering the affected data inaccessible.14d
CVE-2026-641127.8 HIG
0.8%
——0In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rbd: eliminate a race in lock_dwork draining on unmap Given how rbd_lock_add_request() and rbd_img_exclusive_lock() are written, lock_dwork may be (re)queued more than it's actually needed: for example in case a new I/O request comes in while we are in the middle of rbd_acquire_lock() on behalf of another I/O request. This is expected and with rbd_release_lock() preemptively canceling lock_dwork is benign under normal operation. A more problematic example is maybe_kick_acquire(): if (have_requests || delayed_work_pending(&rbd_dev->lock_dwork)) { dout("%s rbd_dev %p kicking lock_dwork\n", __func__, rbd_dev); mod_delayed_work(rbd_dev->task_wq, &rbd_dev->lock_dwork, 0); } It's not unrealistic for lock_dwork to get canceled right after delayed_work_pending() returns true and for mod_delayed_work() to requeue it right there anyway. This is a classic TOCTOU race. When it comes to unmapping the image, there is an implicit assumption of no self-initiated exclusive lock activity past the point of return from rbd_dev_image_unlock() which unlocks the lock if it happens to be held. This unlock is assumed to be final and lock_dwork (as well as all other exclusive lock tasks, really) isn't expected to get queued again. However, lock_dwork is canceled only in cancel_tasks_sync() (i.e. later in the unmap sequence) and on top of that the cancellation can get in effect nullified by maybe_kick_acquire(). This may result in rbd_acquire_lock() executing after rbd_dev_device_release() and rbd_dev_image_release() run and free and/or reset a bunch of things. One of the possible failure modes then is a violated rbd_assert(rbd_image_format_valid(rbd_dev->image_format)); in rbd_dev_header_info() which is called via rbd_dev_refresh() from rbd_post_acquire_action(). Redo exclusive lock task draining to provide saner semantics and try to meet the assumptions around rbd_dev_image_unlock().3d
CVE-2022-26433—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-499197.8 HIG
0.8%
——0In tt_face_colr_blend_layer of ttcolr.c, there is a possible remote code execution due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.28d
CVE-2023-33064—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2023-48401—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2025-27701—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2025-58922—
0.8%
——0——