CVE-2025-48615
In getComponentName of MediaButtonReceiverHolder.java, there is a possible desync in persistence due to resource exhaustion. This could lead
CVSS
7.8
Alto
EPSS
0.1%
p1
KEV
—
Exploit Today
0
0-100
Publicado: 8 dic 2025 · Última mod.: 7 oct 2026 · CWE-770 · CWE-400
0.1%EPSS · 30 días0.1%
2026-10-042026-10-31
In getComponentName of MediaButtonReceiverHolder.java, there is a possible desync in persistence due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-84170——
———Allocation of resources without limits or throttling in Apache Wicket.
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.upload.resource.AbstractFileUploadResource is the server side of the form-less upload offered by FileUploadToResourceField, which posts the selected files to a separately mounted resource rather than through a Form. The resource is an application-wide singleton with no component to consult, so newResourceResponse() takes the three limits that bound the upload - the total request size, the maximum size of a single part and the maximum number of parts - from the request parameters maxSize, fileMaxSize and fileCountMax, and hands them to the multipart parser as they arrive. Nothing binds those numbers to the field that is supposed to be uploading. A request naming a very large maxSize is therefore parsed with no effective ceiling on the total size, and omitting fileMaxSize and fileCountMax leaves the per-part and part-count limits unset as well. The values the application configured through FileUploadToResourceField#setMaxSize(), #setFileMaxSize() and #setFileCountMax() are consulted only when the client omits the corresponding parameter, so against a client that supplies one they have no effect at all.
Parts above the parser's in-memory threshold are spooled to the container's temporary directory, and the file parts are then copied into the folder the application's IUploadsFileManager owns, under a sub-folder the request names, where they remain. A part that is not a file is read into the heap in full while the request is parsed. One request, repeatable, can therefore consume as much disk or as much heap as the client chooses to send. The resource carries no authorization annotation and the default authorization strategy permits every resource request, so unless the application authorizes the resource itself the request needs no authentication, no session, no prior page view and no user interaction.
An application is affected where it uses FileUploadToResourceField, or mounts FileUploadResourceReference itself. This is not the ordinary upload path: the resource is a singleton that has to be created and mounted deliberately. An application that configures no upload limit at all loses nothing, because Wicket applies no total-size limit of its own by default; what the defect removes is a limit the application set. Uploads through Form with FileUploadField, and through AjaxFileDropBehavior, are not affected, because both read their limits from the component rather than from the request. The upload resource does not exist in the 8.x line.
This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 9.14.0 through 9.24.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.9.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.25.0 or 10.12.0, which fix the issue.11hCVE-2026-1202374.3 MED—
———A flaw has been found in ag-ui-protocol ag-ui up to 0.0.58. Affected by this issue is the function isInterruptExpired of the file sdks/typescript/packages/client/src/interrupts/index.ts of the component Interrupt expiry. This manipulation causes resource consumption. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been published and may be used. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.16hCVE-2026-1202354.3 MED—
———A security vulnerability has been detected in ag-ui-protocol ag-ui up to 0.0.58. Affected is the function parseSSEStream of the file sdks/typescript/packages/client/src/transform/sse.ts of the component SSE Parser. The manipulation leads to resource consumption. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The identifier of the patch is 9e7b2b00bce215bbf731f1e6094f63812527c432. The affected component should be upgraded.18hCVE-2026-1202344.3 MED—
———A weakness has been identified in ag-ui-protocol ag-ui up to 0.0.58. This impacts the function e.text of the component HTTP Transport. Executing a manipulation can lead to resource consumption. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.18hCVE-2026-117677——
——0When parsing an uploaded Helm chart, Gitea decompressed the archive and read every tar entry while looking for `Chart.yaml` without limiting the decompressed size, and did so before the package size quota was checked; the quota only considers the compressed upload size. A user with package write access to an owner, for example their own account on an instance with open registration, could repeatedly upload small, highly compressed archives that make the server spend CPU time proportional to the decompressed size, degrading the availability of the Gitea instance. The issue does not allow code execution or data access.1dCVE-2026-1202174.3 MED—
——0A vulnerability was detected in Delgan loguru 0.7.3. The affected element is the function AnsiParser.feed of the file loguru/_colorizer.py of the component ANSI Color-Markup Parser. Performing a manipulation results in inefficient regular expression complexity. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.1d