PULSE
EN VIVO64señales / 24h
FEED
ransomdragonforce reclama a GB Group S.A · PL · Financial Servicesransomqilin reclama a D & J Beverage Service · US · Hospitalityransomakira reclama a CF Supply · Retail & E-Commerceransompayload reclama a Zara Investment Holding · ES · Financial Servicesransomailock reclama a DAISEN · JP · Technologyransomailock reclama a Yaomasa · JP · Not Foundransomthegentlemen reclama a Safeware · US · Technologyransomincransom reclama a clgroup · US · Professional Servicesransomblacknevas reclama a Portable Intelligence Inc www.portable-intelligence.com serviced by an IT company Computer... · US · Technologyransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti · Professional Servicesransomkairos reclama a Hightech Signs · US · Manufacturingransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Riker Danzig LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a gamaus.com · US · Technologyransomblacknevas reclama a Westbrook Greenhouse Systems www.westbrooksystems.com serviced by an IT company Computer C... · US · Agriculture and Food Productionransomdragonforce reclama a GB Group S.A · PL · Financial Servicesransomqilin reclama a D & J Beverage Service · US · Hospitalityransomakira reclama a CF Supply · Retail & E-Commerceransompayload reclama a Zara Investment Holding · ES · Financial Servicesransomailock reclama a DAISEN · JP · Technologyransomailock reclama a Yaomasa · JP · Not Foundransomthegentlemen reclama a Safeware · US · Technologyransomincransom reclama a clgroup · US · Professional Servicesransomblacknevas reclama a Portable Intelligence Inc www.portable-intelligence.com serviced by an IT company Computer... · US · Technologyransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti · Professional Servicesransomkairos reclama a Hightech Signs · US · Manufacturingransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Riker Danzig LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a gamaus.com · US · Technologyransomblacknevas reclama a Westbrook Greenhouse Systems www.westbrooksystems.com serviced by an IT company Computer C... · US · Agriculture and Food Production
← Todos los CVEs
CVE Watch30 jul 2026

CVE-2025-67406

https://www.sourcecodester.com Advocate office management system 1.0 is affected by: SQL Injection. The impact is: execute arbitrary code (r

CVSS

7.3

Alto

EPSS

0.2%

p10

KEV

Exploit Today

3

0-100

Publicado: 29 jul 2026 · Última mod.: 30 jul 2026 · CWE-89

EPSS · 30d
0.2%EPSS · 30 días0.2%
2026-07-302026-08-12
Descripción técnica

https://www.sourcecodester.com Advocate office management system 1.0 is affected by: SQL Injection. The impact is: execute arbitrary code (remote). The component is: control/activate_case.php,?id=1. The attack vector is: A SQL Injection vulnerability exists in the activate_case.php in parameter id endpoint of Advocate office management system. Unsanitized user input in the specified parameter is interpolated directly into an SQL query, allowing attackers to infer or extract data and, in some cases, execute stacked/time-based payloads. ¶¶ Affected Component & Parameter Affected Endpoint URL: http://localhost/advocate/kortex_lite/control/activate_case.php?id=1 HTTP Method: GET Vulnerable File: activate_case.php Parameter: id Vector Location: GET Injection Techniques (as identified by sqlmap) Type: error-based Title: MySQL >= 5.1 AND error-based - WHERE, HAVING, ORDER BY or GROUP BY clause (EXTRACTVALUE) Payload: id=1 AND EXTRACTVALUE(6268,CONCAT(0x5c,0x71766b6a71,(SELECT (ELT(6268=6268,1))),0x716a7a6b71)) Type: time-based blind Title: MySQL >= 5.0.12 AND time-based blind (query SLEEP) Payload: id=1 AND (SELECT 4464 FROM (SELECT(SLEEP(5)))aHqo) Proof of Concept (Burp Repeater)

Referencias oficiales
CVEs relacionados
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-118408.8 ALT
0Zohocorp ManageEngine Password Manager Pro versions before 13232 and ManageEngine PAM360 versions before 8552 are vulnerable to authenticated SQL injection.7h
CVE-2026-733328.7 ALT
0CamaleonCMS contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the cama_contact_form plugin that allows low-privileged authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary HTML by submitting unsanitized content to the before_html field through the contact form edit endpoint, which lacks proper authorization controls. Attackers can persist malicious script payloads into the database that execute in victims' browsers when the contact form loads, enabling cookie theft, forged authenticated requests against the admin interface, and session takeover of viewing users.19h
CVE-2026-733317.1 ALT
0CamaleonCMS 2.9.1 contains an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers with post creation or editing privileges to submit a crafted slug value containing SQL syntax that the database backend evaluates as part of an inadequately parameterized query. Attackers can supply malicious slug payloads using boolean- or union-style blind SQL injection techniques to extract sensitive data from the underlying SQLite database, including administrative credentials and configuration values stored in application tables.19h
CVE-2026-728078.0 ALT
0SiYuan versions before v3.7.4 contain a second-order SQL injection vulnerability in attribute-view template columns that expose the queryBlocks function, which executes raw SQL using string substitution instead of parameterized queries. Attackers can distribute malicious SiYuan documents or packages with crafted template columns that execute arbitrary SQL on a victim's kernel when the package is imported and rendered, enabling read and write access across notebooks.18h
CVE-2026-67579
0Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in ash-project ash allows an unauthenticated attacker to inject a filter expression through a forged keyset pagination cursor, resulting in SQL injection or code execution depending on the data layer. Read actions with keyset pagination decode the client-supplied page[:after] or page[:before] cursor in decode_values/2 in lib/ash/page/keyset.ex using non_executable_binary_to_term/2 with [:safe]. That guard blocks new atoms, funs, and ports, but not a struct built from atoms already interned in a running Ash application, so a decoded %Ash.Query.Call{} expression survives and is spliced into the keyset filter as a comparison value in do_filters/4 and evaluated. Because the cursor bypasses the Ash.Expr macro, the runtime never applies the private?/public? gate that would otherwise reject it. On AshPostgres the injected fragment is inlined into the SQL query; on the ETS and Simple data layers it is evaluated in-process as an arbitrary function call. This issue affects ash: from 1.17.0 before 3.31.3.18h
CVE-2026-171117.6 ALT
0IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 s vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify, or delete information in the back-end database.18h