CVE-2026-102318
Out of bounds read in WebGL in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.92 allowed a remote attacker to read memory outside the sandbox via a craft
CVSS
4.7
Medio
EPSS
—
KEV
—
Exploit Today
0
0-100
Publicado: 29 sept 2026 · Última mod.: 29 sept 2026 · CWE-125
Sin historial EPSS suficiente todavía.
Out of bounds read in WebGL in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.92 allowed a remote attacker to read memory outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-1028206.2 MED—
——0pageant provides a [PageantStream] type that implements [AsyncRead] and [AsyncWrite] traits and can be used to talk to a running Pageant instance. Prior to pageant 0.2.3, the Windows pageant crate's pageant/src/wmmessage.rs MemoryMap::read function trusts a peer-controlled u32 response length supplied through the 8192-byte Pageant shared-memory mapping reached by AgentClient::connect_pageant. A local process that impersonates the Pageant window can make query_pageant_direct allocate up to approximately 4 GiB and copy beyond the mapped view, reliably crashing a russh client and conditionally exposing adjacent committed memory. This issue is fixed in pageant 0.2.3.13hCVE-2026-102757——
——0An unprivileged, memory-protected ThreadX module can have the kernel read and write memory at addresses of its choosing, in privileged mode, and can use that to clear the MPU enable bit and remove its own isolation boundary.
The Module Manager decided whether a privileged service could dereference an object address a module named by asking only whether that address fell outside the module. The manager's object pool is outside every module, so the test was satisfied by an address shifted into the interior of one of the module's own privileged allocations, which denotes no object at all. The bytes such an address presents as a control block are bytes the module put there through ordinary create and set services, so the control block ID at the front of them could be made to read as any type the module chose, and the `_txe_` layer's ID test then agreed. The reported chain uses that to reach a privileged `memset` across an attacker-chosen range.14hCVE-2026-102726——
——0Unbounded PPP IPCP Option Parsing Causes a Worker Stall and Out-of-bounds Read13hCVE-2026-102725——
——0Out-of-bounds Read from Unvalidated MSRP Attribute List Length13hCVE-2026-102721——
——0A TFTP server that answers with a short ERROR packet makes the client read up to 64 bytes past the
received datagram.
Each receive path checks only that the datagram is at least four bytes long (nxd_tftp_client.c:1229,
1521, 1984). When the opcode is NX_TFTP_CODE_ERROR the message string is copied with a loop whose
only limits are the destination buffer and a NUL byte:
```c
/* addons/tftp/nxd_tftp_client.c:1769 */
for (i = 0; (i < (sizeof(tftp_client_ptr -> nx_tftp_client_error_string) - 1)) && (*buffer_ptr); i++)
```
Nothing compares `buffer_ptr` against `nx_packet_append_ptr`. An ERROR packet that carries no
terminating NUL, which a server controls completely, walks the loop off the end of the packet until
it happens to meet a zero byte or fills the 64 byte destination.
```
ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow
READ of size 1 at 0x60d0000000c8 thread T4
#0 _nxd_tftp_client_file_read addons/tftp/nxd_tftp_client.c:1769
0x60d0000000c8 is 0 bytes to the right of 136-byte region
```
The open path has the same loop at :1327 and reports the same way. What is read lands in
`nx_tftp_client_error_string`, which the application is expected to display or log, so adjacent
packet pool memory ends up in whatever the device does with the error text.
Add `(buffer_ptr < packet_ptr -> nx_packet_append_ptr)` to the loop condition in all three paths.13hCVE-2026-102720——
——0A DHCP server, or anyone on the LAN who answers a DISCOVER first, can make the client read about a
kilobyte past the end of the received message.
The option walk keeps a pointer and an offset in step, and the only bound check uses the offset:
```c
/* addons/dhcp/nxd_dhcp_client.c:7538, 7572 */
while (i < length - 1)
{
...
size = *(++data); /* data moves 1: type -> length byte */
data += size + 1; /* data moves size + 1 more */
i += size + 1; /* i moves only size + 1 */
}
```
A TLV option occupies size + 2 bytes. `data` is advanced by size + 2 in total, `i` by size + 1, so
the offset falls one byte behind the real read position for every option the walk skips. After
enough skipped options the check `i < length - 1` still holds while `data` is already past the end
of the message, and the subsequent read of the type and length bytes comes from whatever follows.
A single OFFER carrying a long run of skippable options is enough:
```
ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow
READ of size 1 at 0x61b000000794 thread T5
#0 _nx_dhcp_search_buffer addons/dhcp/nxd_dhcp_client.c:7541
#1 _nx_dhcp_get_option_value addons/dhcp/nxd_dhcp_client.c:7082
0x61b000000794 is located 164 bytes to the right of 1648-byte region
```
A well formed OFFER through the same path is handled normally, the client records the offer and
moves to REQUESTING, so the difference is the option layout rather than the harness.
The read runs in the DHCP client thread while the client is still unconfigured, so it happens on
every boot in reach of a hostile DHCP responder. The values read are used to configure the
interface, which is how the disclosed bytes become observable.
Advance `i` by size + 2, or derive the bound from `data` rather than keeping a second counter.13h