PULSE
FEED
ransomqilin reclama a Segres Systec · ES · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Shield Wall Systems of Florida · US · Government & Defenseransomqilin reclama a The Excalibur Group · US · Otherransomiah6477 reclama a hilmar-cheese · US · Agriculture and Food Productionransomn0n reclama a Company #70 · EG · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #73 · Not Foundransomlockbit5 reclama a torcivialaw.com · IT · Professional Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a kidzrkooldental.com · US · Healthcareransomlockbit5 reclama a lcww.com.eg · EG · Not Foundransomlockbit5 reclama a neweramachines.com · US · Manufacturingransomlockbit5 reclama a grupoabg.com · MX · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a KD Corp · KR · Not Foundransomakira reclama a Videk · GB · Technologyransomakira reclama a Boyle, Pecharich, Cline, Whittington and Stallings · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Segres Systec · ES · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Shield Wall Systems of Florida · US · Government & Defenseransomqilin reclama a The Excalibur Group · US · Otherransomiah6477 reclama a hilmar-cheese · US · Agriculture and Food Productionransomn0n reclama a Company #70 · EG · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #73 · Not Foundransomlockbit5 reclama a torcivialaw.com · IT · Professional Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a kidzrkooldental.com · US · Healthcareransomlockbit5 reclama a lcww.com.eg · EG · Not Foundransomlockbit5 reclama a neweramachines.com · US · Manufacturingransomlockbit5 reclama a grupoabg.com · MX · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a KD Corp · KR · Not Foundransomakira reclama a Videk · GB · Technologyransomakira reclama a Boyle, Pecharich, Cline, Whittington and Stallings · Professional Services
← Todos los CVEs
CVE Watch15 oct 2026

CVE-2026-104024

Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs (CWE-184) in the dangerous-extension confirmation of the archive object viewer (peach.pas, grid_obj_ope

CVSS

—

Sin CVSS

EPSS

—

KEV

—

Exploit Today

—

0-100

Publicado: 15 oct 2026 · Última mod.: 15 oct 2026 · CWE-184 · CWE-693

EPSS · 30d

Sin historial EPSS suficiente todavía.

Descripción técnica

Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs (CWE-184) in the dangerous-extension confirmation of the archive object viewer (peach.pas, grid_obj_open) in PeaZip 10.5.0 through 11.2.0 on Windows allows an attacker who convinces a victim to open an entry of a crafted archive to execute a program, or an arbitrary command, with no confirmation dialog. The prompt (Do you want to run this file?) is gated by SECEXTCONST, a hard-coded list of seven extensions (exe cmd msi bat ps1 vbs reg); the check is an exact string comparison of the entry extension against that list, so it answers only whether the extension is one of the seven and never whether the shell will execute the file. Shell-executable and scripting-host types that Windows runs through ShellExecuteW are absent from the list, among them .url and .lnk. An archived Windows Internet Shortcut (.url) whose URL line is attacker-controlled is launched with no prompt, while the byte-identical content in an entry named .bat does raise the warning in the same session. A .lnk entry raises the ceiling from launching a program to running a command line, because a Windows shortcut carries arguments: a proof-of-concept shortcut targeting cmd.exe with an attacker-chosen command line executed with no prompt. The shortcut target is not confined to the local disk; the shell also resolved an attacker-named UNC path (fetching a remote payload was only attempted, not demonstrated). No privilege escalation; everything runs as the user who opened the archive.

Referencias oficiales
CVEs relacionados
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-77466—
—
———Lychee is a free, open-source photo-management tool. Prior to 7.7.0, Lychee hides the Omnipay Dummy test provider from the checkout options in production through OmnipayFactory::get_supported_providers(), but CreateSessionRequest validates only that the submitted provider is an OmnipayProviderType and does not enforce OmnipayProviderType::isAllowed(). A buyer, including a guest when webshop_allow_guest_checkout is enabled, can submit Dummy directly and complete the test gateway flow without a real payment. When webshop_auto_fulfill_enabled is enabled, OrderCompletedListener::fullfillOrder() can then release the purchasable item. The issue requires access to the Supporter or Pro webshop and an enabled purchasable item. Testing bypassed the closed-source license middleware, so whether the real license layer performs additional payment-provider validation remains unverified. The payment finalize status check itself is not the root cause. This issue is fixed in version 7.7.0.3h
CVE-2026-104025—
—
———Path Traversal (CWE-22) in the execute_obj function of the archive object viewer (peach.pas) in PeaZip 11.2.0 and earlier on Windows allows an attacker who convinces a victim to preview an entry of a crafted archive via the "Preview with... -> Associated application" action (Shift+Ctrl+O) to execute an arbitrary program already present on the victim's system, with no warning dialog. The function validates only outname (PeaZip's own temporary directory) with checkfiledirname, while the string actually executed is the concatenation outname+tempstring; tempstring is taken verbatim from the archive entry name (StringGridList.Cells[12,...]) and is never validated. checkfiledirname (list_utils.pas) rejects control and reserved characters in the file name but performs no ".." path-containment check, so an entry named ../../../../Windows/System32/calc.exe escapes the extraction directory and is passed to cp_open -> ShellExecuteW; the extracting backend (7-Zip) strips the traversal while the opener does not. In addition, the SECEXTCONST dangerous-extension confirmation prompt is implemented only in the double-click handler (grid_obj_open) and not on this preview route, so an executable inside an archive reaches ShellExecuteW unannounced, and where the prompt does fire it names the entry's display name rather than the resolved path that will run. Arbitrary code execution was demonstrated with a proof of concept against official PeaZip builds, confirmed on two archive formats (.zip and .tar) to show the defect is in PeaZip's own path handling and not in a single format parser.7h
CVE-2026-1108664.7 MED
—
——0Renovate before 44.61.3 contains a protection mechanism bypass vulnerability that allows minimumReleaseAge checks to be skipped when a user requests a PR rebase via the rebase/retry checkbox. Attackers who publish a malicious dependency version can have it pushed into the PR and run in CI before the required release age elapses.22h
CVE-2026-1106895.3 MED
—
——0A security flaw has been discovered in OpenClaw ClawScan up to 0.1.6. This impacts the function shouldSkipTargetPath of the file internal/runner/runner.go of the component Static Scanner. Performing a manipulation results in protection mechanism failure. Attacking locally is a requirement. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. Upgrading to version 0.1.7 will fix this issue. The patch is named 9f6a6fbb9f1137345566d0ab44c73893dfe112fa. The affected component should be upgraded.7h
CVE-2026-1020876.5 MED
—
——0An Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS). When in a BGP traffic engineering scenario a specific, valid, optional, non-transitive BGP update is received over an established BGP session, RPD crashes and automatically restarts, which leads to traffic impact until routing has reconverged. This issue affects: Junos OS: * All versions before 23.2R2-S6; * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S7; * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2-S4; * 24.4 versions before 24.4R2-S4; * 25.2 versions before 25.2R1-S2, 25.2R2; Junos OS Evolved: * All versions before 23.2R2-S6-EVO; * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S8.11-EVO; * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2-S4-EVO; * 24.4 versions before 24.4R2-S5-EVO; * 25.2 versions before 25.2R1-S2-EVO, 25.2R2-EVO;5h
CVE-2026-668746.5 MED
—
——0For pull request events, Gitea reads workflow definitions from the pull request head and posts a synthetic skipped status when workflow branch or path filters exclude execution. A fork pull request author can supply a workflow matching a required status context but deliberately prevent it from running. Because skipped statuses count as success, branch protection or organization-required workflow checks can appear satisfied without the mandated workflow executing; no runner or maintainer approval is required for this path.1d