CVE-2026-116835
In affected versions of Octopus Server, insufficient validation of custom claims on OIDC accounts allowed a user with permission to edit acc
CVSS
—
Sin CVSS
EPSS
—
KEV
—
Exploit Today
—
0-100
Publicado: 12 nov 2026 · Última mod.: 12 nov 2026 · CWE-915
Sin historial EPSS suficiente todavía.
In affected versions of Octopus Server, insufficient validation of custom claims on OIDC accounts allowed a user with permission to edit accounts to cause Octopus Server to issue signed OIDC tokens that impersonate a different project. This could grant access to external systems, such as cloud providers or other Octopus instances, that trust that project's identity.
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-820144.3 MED—
——0Any authenticated user, including a Viewer, could change the preferences of any team, such as its home dashboard, theme and timezone, through an undocumented endpoint with no access control, and so redirect every member of that team to a dashboard of their choice (missing authorization).1dCVE-2026-1260817.5 ALT50.4%
——15Action Pack is a framework for handling and responding to web requests. Prior to 8.1.4.1 and 8.0.5.2, ActionController::Parameters#each_key delegates to the internal ActiveSupport::HashWithIndifferentAccess that holds the request parameters, so when called with a block it returns that hash instead of the Parameters instance. The hash does not respond to permitted?, so Active Model mass assignment (new, assign_attributes, update) accepts it without raising ActiveModel::ForbiddenAttributesError. An application that passes the return value of each_key to mass assignment could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to set attributes that the application does not permit, such as an authorization flag. This is an incomplete fix of CVE-2020-8164, which made each, each_pair and each_value return the Parameters instance but left each_key delegated. An application is affected if it passes the return value of ActionController::Parameters#each_key, called with a block, to mass assignment. Rails itself makes no such call. This issue is fixed in versions 8.1.4.1 and 8.0.5.2.2dCVE-2026-120730—29.9%
——9Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes vulnerability in the device API, device forms, signing key and product forms and JITP settings in nerves-hub nerves_hub_web allows an authenticated user who manages devices in any organization to write into other organizations via submitted org_id, product_id and deployment_id fields. The device API create and update actions and the dashboard device forms pass the request parameters to NervesHub.Devices.Device.changeset/2, which casts the organization, product, deployment group and update state as given. The signing key and product forms merge the session's organization into the submitted parameters so that a submitted org_id wins, and the JITP changeset accepts any product_id. Each request requires the manage role only in the user's own organization, and any account can create one.
A device placed on another organization's deployment group, or moved into its product, is sent that organization's firmware with a download URL. The user cannot change or control devices that already belong to the other organization, and cannot upload firmware to it.
This issue affects nerves_hub: from 1.0.0 before 2.5.3.50mCVE-2026-956488.1 ALT15.6%
——5Improperly controlled modification of Dynamically-Determined object attributes vulnerability in C-Prot Inc. C-Prot AppDefense allows Privilege Escalation.
This issue affects C-Prot AppDefense: before 1.0.2729.2hCVE-2026-1235265.4 MED17.4%
——5Vikunja before 2.7.1 contains a mass assignment vulnerability that allows any authenticated user to set the read-only external_id field through the team create and update endpoints. Attackers can tag a team they create or administer as externally managed, permanently blocking removal of every member and causing SSO members to be dropped from the team at their next login.3dCVE-2026-173949.6 CRÍ44.4%
——13IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improperly controlled modification of object attributes. A user-supplied value could change an access-related setting that should be controlled by the system, which could expose sensitive information.3d