PULSE
FEED
ransomshiba reclama a IT Foods Industries · Agriculture and Food Productionransomshiba reclama a Friendly Senior Living · Healthcareransomshiba reclama a Morgan White Group · Professional Servicesransomshiba reclama a Antwerp House Dentistry · GB · Healthcareransomeverstake reclama a as*****g.comransomeverstake reclama a ca*****s.comransomeverstake reclama a in*****s.comransomeverstake reclama a corp-smart.com · Technologyransomwhitearmor reclama a rolly.io · Technologyransomemperador reclama a LA PROFUMERIA SRL · IT · Retail & E-Commerceransomscarlettgroup reclama a sunnybrook.ca · CA · Healthcareransomscarlettgroup reclama a au.bank.in · IN · Financial Servicesransomqilin reclama a Udima · ES · Educationransomqilin reclama a W Interactive · GB · Technologyransomshiba reclama a IT Foods Industries · Agriculture and Food Productionransomshiba reclama a Friendly Senior Living · Healthcareransomshiba reclama a Morgan White Group · Professional Servicesransomshiba reclama a Antwerp House Dentistry · GB · Healthcareransomeverstake reclama a as*****g.comransomeverstake reclama a ca*****s.comransomeverstake reclama a in*****s.comransomeverstake reclama a corp-smart.com · Technologyransomwhitearmor reclama a rolly.io · Technologyransomemperador reclama a LA PROFUMERIA SRL · IT · Retail & E-Commerceransomscarlettgroup reclama a sunnybrook.ca · CA · Healthcareransomscarlettgroup reclama a au.bank.in · IN · Financial Servicesransomqilin reclama a Udima · ES · Educationransomqilin reclama a W Interactive · GB · Technology
← Todos los CVEs
CVE Watch29 oct 2026

CVE-2026-119186

Forge (also called node-forge) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to 1.4.1, node-forge did not vali

CVSS

5.9

Medio

EPSS

—

KEV

—

Exploit Today

—

0-100

Publicado: 29 oct 2026 · Última mod.: 29 oct 2026 · CWE-354 · CWE-1284

EPSS · 30d

Sin historial EPSS suficiente todavía.

Descripción técnica

Forge (also called node-forge) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to 1.4.1, node-forge did not validate the AES-GCM tagLength option passed to start() during decryption through forge.cipher.createDecipher(). When an application derived tagLength from received data or used an unset or zero-like configuration value, a value that converted to zero together with an empty or missing authentication tag caused the calculated and supplied tags to compare as empty, so decipher.finish() accepted unauthenticated ciphertext. Applications that omit tagLength to use the 128-bit default or pass a fixed valid tag length are unaffected. This issue is fixed in version 1.4.1.

Referencias oficiales
CVEs relacionados
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-1187827.5 ALT
—
———Forge (also called node-forge) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to 1.4.1, node-forge accepted a PKCS#12 MAC or PKCS#12 password-based encryption iteration count of zero or less. pki.pbe.generatePkcs12Key() then returned a constant key independent of the password and salt, allowing crafted PKCS#12 input processed by forge.pkcs12.pkcs12FromAsn1() to bypass password-based integrity checks. Predictable encryption keys and IVs also affected PKCS#12 PBE using pbeWithSHAAnd3-KeyTripleDES-CBC or pbewithSHAAnd40BitRC2-CBC, including shrouded key bags, encrypted SafeContents, and PKCS#8 ENCRYPTED PRIVATE KEY input processed independently by forge.pki.decryptPrivateKeyInfo(). PBES2/PBKDF2-encrypted content is unaffected. This issue is fixed in version 1.4.1.7h
CVE-2026-1187763.7 BAJ
—
———Forge (also called node-forge) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to 1.4.1, the affected implementation used decipher.finish(), CBC and ECB modes, PKCS#7 padding to process the relevant input or security decision. node-forge validated only the final byte of PKCS#7 padding during CBC and ECB decryption and accepted zero, oversized, or mismatched padding bytes. Malformed ciphertext could consequently be accepted and up to four plaintext blocks could be silently removed, causing an integrity failure in applications that treated successful decryption as proof of valid padding. This issue is fixed in version 1.4.1.7h
CVE-2026-114349—
—
——0When a broker decodes a compressed record batch, the per-record decoder reads a declared body size from the decompressed stream and allocates a buffer of that size before validating it against the bytes available or any configured limit. The size is attacker-controlled, and the batch CRC does not constrain it, so a small (around 90-byte), CRC-valid compressed produce request can declare a body size of up to about 2 GiB and force the broker to attempt that allocation, raising OutOfMemoryError. The record size limit (max.message.bytes), the request size limit, and client/broker quotas bound only the compressed wire size, not the declared decompressed size. Impact: An authenticated principal with Write on a topic can crash broker request-handler threads (reached when a batch's codec differs from the topic's compression.type and records are re-encoded) and any consumer that fetches the record, denying service. On brokers started with -XX:+ExitOnOutOfMemoryError, a common hardening, a single crafted request terminates the broker JVM. More seriously, a crafted record  is accepted at ingest and written to disk; when the log-cleaner later reads it on a compacted topic, the OutOfMemoryError (an Error, not an Exception) terminates the cleaner thread, which is not restarted. With the default of a single cleaner thread, log compaction then stops for the entire broker, including the internal __consumer_offsets and __transaction_state topics, and the condition persists across restarts until the offending record is removed. The impact is availability only; no data is disclosed or altered. Mitigation: Upgrade to Apache Kafka 4.2.2, 4.3.2, or 4.4.0, and set max.decompressed.message.bytes (at the broker and/or topic level) to a bounded value appropriate for your workload. Upgrading alone is not sufficient: for backward compatibility this configuration defaults to an effectively unlimited value (about 2 GiB), so a broker remains exposed until the limit is set. Choose a value at or slightly above the largest legitimate decompressed record your applications produce, and comfortably below the broker heap divided by the number of request-handler and cleaner threads. Until you can upgrade and configure the limit, restrict Write access to trusted producers; quotas and max.message.bytes do not mitigate this issue. Resolution: From Apache Kafka 4.2.2, 4.3.2, and 4.4.0: the broker validates a record's declared decompressed body size against max.decompressed.message.bytes before allocating, on the produce-validation, log-compaction, and timestamp-lookup paths, and rejects oversized or negative sizes with InvalidRecordException. Operators must set this configuration to a bounded value to be protected, as its default is effectively unlimited.10h
CVE-2026-907206.7 MED
0.2%
——0Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Protection mechanism bypass.1d
CVE-2026-103594—
37.4%
——11A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Fireware OS's WireGuard configuration processing allows a remote attacker that has man-in-the-middle TLS-decrypted access between the Firebox and WatchGuard Cloud to create a Denial of Service condition and potentially execute arbitrary code by tampering with a FireCloud Gateway configuration payload.1d
CVE-2026-1166085.4 MED
4.2%
——1A security vulnerability has been detected in DAMO Academy VideoLLaMA2 up to 1.1. Affected by this issue is the function load_pretrained_model of the file videollama2/model/__init__.py of the component Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument _name_or_path leads to improper validation of integrity check value. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.2d