PULSE
EN VIVO0señales / 24h
FEED
vulnKEV agrega CVE-2023-49105 — ownCloud / ownCloudvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-53362 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-66384 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2021-23758 — Ajax.NET Professional / Ajax.NET ProfessionalvulnKEV agrega CVE-2015-3246 — Red Hat / LibuservulnKEV agrega CVE-2015-5287 — Red Hat / Automatic Bug Reporting ToolvulnKEV agrega CVE-2022-0995 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-8452 — Citrix / NetScaler ADC and NetScaler GatewayvulnKEV agrega CVE-2019-1068 — Microsoft / SQL ServervulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-60004 — Gitea / GiteavulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-21962 — Oracle / HTTP Server and Oracle Weblogic Server Proxy Plug-invulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-73570 — Synacor / Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS)vulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-72530 — TrueConf / ServervulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-72529 — TrueConf / ServervulnKEV agrega CVE-2023-49105 — ownCloud / ownCloudvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-53362 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-66384 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2021-23758 — Ajax.NET Professional / Ajax.NET ProfessionalvulnKEV agrega CVE-2015-3246 — Red Hat / LibuservulnKEV agrega CVE-2015-5287 — Red Hat / Automatic Bug Reporting ToolvulnKEV agrega CVE-2022-0995 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-8452 — Citrix / NetScaler ADC and NetScaler GatewayvulnKEV agrega CVE-2019-1068 — Microsoft / SQL ServervulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-60004 — Gitea / GiteavulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-21962 — Oracle / HTTP Server and Oracle Weblogic Server Proxy Plug-invulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-73570 — Synacor / Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS)vulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-72530 — TrueConf / ServervulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-72529 — TrueConf / Server
← Todos los CVEs
CVE Watch9 jul 2026

CVE-2026-14868

The encryption algorithm used to protect the configuration of user accounts, stored in the built-in user directory of PcVue projects, all ve

CVSS

5.5

Medio

EPSS

0.1%

p0

KEV

Exploit Today

0

0-100

Publicado: 7 jul 2026 · Última mod.: 9 jul 2026 · CWE-326

EPSS · 30d
0.1%EPSS · 30 días0.1%
2026-08-032026-08-31
Descripción técnica

The encryption algorithm used to protect the configuration of user accounts, stored in the built-in user directory of PcVue projects, all versions prior to 17.0.0, is not strong enough for the level of protection required. A local attacker could alter the existing configuration and ultimately gain privileged access to the PcVue application.

Referencias oficiales
CVEs relacionados
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-175204.8 MED
2.1%
1The Newsletters WordPress plugin before 4.17 does not generate its API key using a sufficiently random source, deriving it from a publicly known value, allowing unauthenticated attackers to compute the key and perform privileged actions such as adding and deleting subscribers and sending emails, when the optional API has been enabled.2d
CVE-2026-817187.5 ALT
3.0%
1openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.9 use under-parameterized PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 with only 100,000 iterations to protect PQC keyfile private keys and 10,000 iterations for dual-encryption file-password verification. Attackers who obtain keyfiles or encrypted files can brute-force wrapping passwords offline using GPU or ASIC acceleration.19h
CVE-2026-790844.3 MED
3.2%
1Inadequate encryption strength in Notifications in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)4d
CVE-2026-748899.8 CRÍ
10.0%
3openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.0 use HKDF with no salt and static info parameter in key normalization functions, reducing entropy extraction and determinism. Attackers can exploit predictable key derivation with identical inputs to weaken cryptographic security against multi-target attacks.16h
CVE-2026-657775.3 MED
20.8%
6Inadequate encryption strength in Windows Active Directory allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.18d
CVE-2026-92018.8 ALT
13.9%
4IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a cryptographic weakness in the custom component validation mechanism. When the optional hardening mode that restricts execution to trusted component templates is enabled, the application validates component code using a truncated SHA‑256 hash. Because the hash comparison relies on only a portion of the digest, an attacker can craft malicious component code that collides with a trusted template hash and bypasses validation. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to introduce and execute unauthorized Python code within the Langflow process, defeating the intended security control and potentially leading to full compromise of the affected instance.15d