CVE Watch24 jul 2026

CVE-2026-33825

Microsoft Defender Insufficient Granularity of Access Control Vulnerability

CVSS

7.8

Alto

EPSS

6.7%

p93

KEV

SÍ

22 abr 2026

Exploit Today

0-100

Publicado: 14 abr 2026 · Última mod.: 24 jul 2026 · CWE-1220

EPSS · 30d

6.7%EPSS · 30 días6.7%

2026-08-022026-08-31

Ficha del catálogo KEV

Producto

Microsoft / Defender

Vulnerabilidad

Microsoft Defender Insufficient Granularity of Access Control Vulnerability

Añadido a KEV

22 abr 2026

Remediar antes de

6 may 2026

Uso conocido en ransomware

Sí

Descripción resumida

Microsoft Defender contains an insufficient granularity of access control vulnerability that could allow an authorized attacker to escalate privileges locally.

Acción requerida

Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.

Notas

https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33825 ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33825

Descripción técnica

Insufficient granularity of access control in Microsoft Defender allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Referencias oficiales

CVEs relacionados

CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.

CVE-2026-781227.4 ALT

24.7%

——7docker-socket-proxy fails to properly gate read endpoints in the /containers Docker API namespace when the CONTAINERS environment variable is set. Attackers can use GET requests to /containers/{id}/archive, /containers/{id}/export, /containers/{id}/logs, and /containers/{id}/top to read arbitrary files and download entire container filesystems as tar archives.5d CVE-2026-40145—

2.6%

——1A vulnerability exists in the interaction between a Endpoint Privilege Management (Windows Deployment) support utility and the agent's tamper protection controls. Under certain conditions, the protections applied to the utility process may not be enforced as intended.14d CVE-2026-688686.5 MED

39.4%

——12The Google Cloud Secret Manager secrets backend in Apache Airflow's Google provider never applied the team scope when resolving Connections and Variables: the caller's `team_name` was accepted by the backend but dropped at the internal call boundary, so every lookup resolved against the team-agnostic secret name. In a deployment running multi-team mode with this backend, a task or Dag belonging to one team resolved another team's Connection or Variable, obtaining its credentials in full. No unusual configuration is required beyond enabling multi-team mode and using this backend. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow-providers-google 22.3.0 or later, which builds and applies the team-scoped secret name.14d CVE-2026-627217.8 ALT

31.0%

——9Insufficient granularity of access control in User-Mode Power Service (UMPS) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.15d CVE-2025-31938—

0.4%

——0Insufficient granularity of access control in some subsystem for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 Scalable processors with Intel(R) TDX may allow an information disclosure. Authorized adversary with an authenticated user combined with a high complexity attack may enable data exposure. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present with special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.19d CVE-2026-165605.3 MED

32.7%

——10A heap-buffer-overflow flaw was found in Directory Server (389-ds-base). When a DN contains a legacy-quoted value, the server won't close the heap allocation allowing another call to refer to the same memory pointer causing a denial of service or an arbitrary memory write operation.40d