PULSE
FEED
ransomrhysida reclama a INTAX, Inc. · Financial Servicesransomkrybit reclama a www.viehhauser-kfz.at · AT · Transportationransombooba project reclama a LifeFone · US · Healthcareransombooba project reclama a National Association of Credit Management · US · Financial Servicesransombooba project reclama a California School Boards Association · US · Educationransombooba project reclama a South Weber City · US · Government & Defenseransombooba project reclama a Programs for Parents, Inc. · US · Educationransombooba project reclama a Circleville Police Department · US · Government & Defenseransomemperador reclama a MAA Group Consulting Engineers · Professional Servicesransomrhysida reclama a ClaimTek Systems · Financial Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a xspringcapital.com · SG · Financial Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a susannecerda.com · MXransomanubis reclama a Santiam Hospital & Clinics · US · Healthcareransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Lowenstein Sandler LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomrhysida reclama a INTAX, Inc. · Financial Servicesransomkrybit reclama a www.viehhauser-kfz.at · AT · Transportationransombooba project reclama a LifeFone · US · Healthcareransombooba project reclama a National Association of Credit Management · US · Financial Servicesransombooba project reclama a California School Boards Association · US · Educationransombooba project reclama a South Weber City · US · Government & Defenseransombooba project reclama a Programs for Parents, Inc. · US · Educationransombooba project reclama a Circleville Police Department · US · Government & Defenseransomemperador reclama a MAA Group Consulting Engineers · Professional Servicesransomrhysida reclama a ClaimTek Systems · Financial Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a xspringcapital.com · SG · Financial Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a susannecerda.com · MXransomanubis reclama a Santiam Hospital & Clinics · US · Healthcareransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Lowenstein Sandler LLP · US · Professional Services
← Todos los CVEs
CVE Watch24 jul 2026

CVE-2026-34831

Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. Prior to versions 2.2.23, 3.1.21, and 3.2.6, Rack::Files#fail sets the Content-Length response

CVSS

4.8

Medio

EPSS

0.1%

p4

KEV

—

Exploit Today

1

0-100

Publicado: 2 abr 2026 · Última mod.: 24 jul 2026 · CWE-130 · CWE-135

EPSS · 30d
0.1%EPSS · 30 días0.2%
2026-09-302026-10-28
Descripción técnica

Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. Prior to versions 2.2.23, 3.1.21, and 3.2.6, Rack::Files#fail sets the Content-Length response header using String#size instead of String#bytesize. When the response body contains multibyte UTF-8 characters, the declared Content-Length is smaller than the number of bytes actually sent on the wire. Because Rack::Files reflects the requested path in 404 responses, an attacker can trigger this mismatch by requesting a non-existent path containing percent-encoded UTF-8 characters. This results in incorrect HTTP response framing and may cause response desynchronization in deployments that rely on the incorrect Content-Length value. This issue has been patched in versions 2.2.23, 3.1.21, and 3.2.6.

Referencias oficiales
CVEs relacionados
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-115794—
—
———P-Net before 1.0.3 passes the application alarm callback a data length derived from the variable part length field of a received RTA alarm frame without checking it against the length of the received frame. A short frame can make the callback receive a length of up to 65507 bytes. An application that copies the reported number of bytes reads past the end of the receive buffer. The attacker must have established an Application Relationship and requires ADJACENT network access. Applications that do not use the alarm data are not affected.3h
CVE-2026-116531—
—
——0HTTP::Body versions before 1.23_01 for Perl lose track of chunk boundaries in chunked request bodies when a read ends inside a chunk. In chunked mode, used when no content length is given, add() treats a chunk as complete once the buffer is as long as the chunk's declared size, but the buffer still holds the chunk-size line. When a read ends in the last bytes of a chunk, add() takes the chunk short and parses the leftover data as the next chunk-size line. A remote attacker can make a chunked body never complete, hanging a server that reads until the body is done, and may make it complete early, leaving the remaining bytes to be read as the next request.4h
CVE-2026-1145977.5 ALT
22.4%
——7In EPICS Base release 7.0.10 and prior, an insufficient validation of element or length values in a network message can cause the application to read beyond the bounds of an allocated buffer. This may lead to denial of service and could expose adjacent memory contents.1d
CVE-2026-1160133.7 BAJ
21.3%
——6OpenResty lua-resty-dns before 0.24 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in parse_section() and _decode_name() that fails to check resource record lengths against the received message. Attackers controlling or spoofing a queried nameserver can send truncated record headers or RDATA, raising uncaught Lua exceptions in resolver:query() that abort requests and break name resolution.3d
CVE-2026-1146466.5 MED
18.1%
——5A data-validation flaw exists in the BSON handling and binary serialization path of the MongoDB C# Driver. When an application constructs a raw or lazy BSON document object from externally supplied binary data, the driver does not verify that the size quantity declared inside that data matches the amount of data actually provided, and it copies the data onto the wire unchanged. An unauthenticated party who can supply binary content to such an application can thereby cause additional elements to be inserted into, or existing elements to be removed from, the database command the application issues, without needing any database credentials of their own. This can result in unauthorized modification of stored data and disclosure of data outside the intended scope of the application's request, bounded by the database privileges the application itself holds.6d
CVE-2026-1059605.5 MED
1.5%
——0PEAK-System PCAN contains a vulnerable operation involving a variable-length receive-record copy. The driver uses a requested or queued record count without sufficiently capping the copy to the actual caller-supplied output length.9d