CVE Watch24 jul 2026

CVE-2026-39411

LobeHub is a work-and-lifestyle space to find, build, and collaborate with agent teammates that grow with you. Prior to 2.1.48, the webapi a

CVSS

5.0

Medio

EPSS

0.1%

KEV

—

Exploit Today

0-100

Publicado: 8 abr 2026 · Última mod.: 24 jul 2026 · CWE-287 · CWE-290 · CWE-345

EPSS · 30d

0.1%EPSS · 30 días0.2%

2026-09-272026-10-25

Descripción técnica

LobeHub is a work-and-lifestyle space to find, build, and collaborate with agent teammates that grow with you. Prior to 2.1.48, the webapi authentication layer trusts a client-controlled X-lobe-chat-auth header that is only XOR-obfuscated, not signed or otherwise authenticated. Because the XOR key is hardcoded in the repository, an attacker can forge arbitrary auth payloads and bypass authentication on protected webapi routes. Affected routes include /webapi/chat/[provider], /webapi/models/[provider], /webapi/models/[provider]/pull, and /webapi/create-image/comfyui. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.1.48.

Referencias oficiales

CVEs relacionados

CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.

CVE-2026-1160067.3 ALT

32.2%

——10A vulnerability was detected in YunaiV/zhijiantianya ruoyi-vue-pro up to 2026.09. The affected element is an unknown function of the file AuthController.java of the component SMS Code Verification. The manipulation of the argument mobile/code results in improper authentication. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.1d CVE-2026-1159963.7 BAJ

13.9%

——4A vulnerability was detected in Unitree Robotics Unitree Go2 up to 1.1.13/1.1.14.1/1.1.15.1. This affects the function WebSocketClient.connect of the file websocket.py of the component chat_go. Performing a manipulation results in improper certificate validation. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is reported as difficult. The vendor confirmed early: "These issues were previously submitted by the researcher through our Security Response Center platform and are tracked internally as follows: Submission 990504 corresponds to our internal ticket #616 (Go2 chat_go WSS client disabled TLS server certificate validation, CWE-295)."1d CVE-2026-1159339.9 CRÍ

16.1%

——5Postiz signs its session, invitation and password reset tokens with one shared secret and without any marker of what a token is for. A route that refreshes the credentials of a browser-extension channel signed data taken from the request itself and stored the result where the requesting user can read it back. A user could therefore obtain a validly signed token containing any claims they choose, which the application accepts as a session, as an organization invitation with a chosen role, as a password reset or as an enterprise provisioning token. A second, narrower route that creates team invitations signs extra fields from the request body in the same way.2d CVE-2026-1109569.8 CRÍ

29.6%

——9The asVereinbase WordPress plugin before 1.1.8 does not require a valid password or a genuine second factor before authenticating a user, treating an empty stored value as a match, so an unauthenticated attacker can log in as any user, including an administrator.2d CVE-2026-1159377.5 ALT

5.8%

——2The Mollie webhook endpoint accepts two independent, attacker-controlled parameters and never verifies that they belong together: * commerceTransactionHash — selects which Craft Commerce transaction is completed * id — selects which Mollie payment is queried for its status An unauthenticated attacker holding any paid Mollie payment ID from the merchant’s account can pair it with any transaction hash. Commerce queries Mollie, sees status: paid, and marks the target transaction successful for that transaction’s full amount, regardless of how much was actually paid.2d CVE-2026-554597.4 ALT

10.3%

——3The Goobi viewer is a web application that allows digitised material to be displayed in a web browser. From version 25.01 to before version 26.05, AuthenticationEndpoint.verifyOpenIdToken builds its verifier as JWT.require(algorithm).withIssuer(issuer).build() and does not enforce the aud claim during cryptographic validation. The aud check is performed manually afterwards via a single string-equality call, which only handles single-string aud values. In a multi-RP IdP setup, a token whose single-string aud matches the viewer's client ID but was issued for a different relying party passes the check and authenticates the attacker as the token's sub. This issue has been patched in version 26.05.3d