CVE Watch24 jul 2026

CVE-2026-42791

Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP public_key (pubkey_ocsp module) allows forged OCSP responses signed with an expi

CVSS

3.7

Bajo

EPSS

0.3%

p24

KEV

—

Exploit Today

0-100

Publicado: 27 may 2026 · Última mod.: 24 jul 2026 · CWE-295 · CWE-672

EPSS · 30d

0.3%EPSS · 30 días0.3%

2026-07-092026-08-06

Descripción técnica

Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP public_key (pubkey_ocsp module) allows forged OCSP responses signed with an expired responder certificate to be accepted as valid. OCSP response verification in pubkey_ocsp:verify_response/5 and pubkey_ocsp:is_authorized_responder/3 in lib/public_key/src/pubkey_ocsp.erl does not check the validity period (notBefore/notAfter) of the OCSP responder certificate. An attacker who has obtained the private key of an expired CA-designated OCSP responder certificate can forge OCSP responses that Erlang/OTP accepts as valid. This affects TLS clients using OCSP stapling via the ssl application: a malicious or compromised server can present a revoked TLS certificate together with a forged OCSP response signed by an expired responder key, and the client will accept the revoked certificate as valid. It also affects applications calling public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 directly, where the impact depends on the use case — server-side client certificate validation using this API may allow authentication bypass with a revoked client certificate. This issue affects OTP from OTP 27.0 before OTP 29.0.1, OTP 28.5.0.1 and OTP 27.3.4.12, corresponding to public_key from 1.16 before 1.21.1, 1.20.3.1 and 1.17.1.3.

Referencias oficiales

CVEs relacionados

CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.

CVE-2026-649936.8 MED

—

——0Dell RVTools versions prior to 4.8.1, contains an improper certificate validation vulnerability in the collector. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability leading to loss of confidentiality and integrity.11h CVE-2026-684817.5 ALT

—

——0In Apache CXF's DefaultEncryptingOAuthDataProvider, revoked access tokens still decrypt successfully, and TokenIntrospectionService reports active:true. The same applies to refresh tokens. This violates the RFC stipulations that 'The authorization server MUST invalidate the token.' and 'introspection of a revoked token MUST return {"active":false}'. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.3 or 4.1.8 or 3.6.12, which fix this issue.16h CVE-2026-167926.1 MED

0.1%

——0An improper certificate validation vulnerability was reported in multiple Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator (LXCO) 2.2.0 microservices that could allow an adjacent network attacker to intercept sensitive communications by performing a machine-in-the-middle attack against HTTPS connections during TLS certificate validation under certain circumstances.2d CVE-2026-69248—

8.3%

——2cryptography is a package designed to expose cryptographic primitives and recipes to Python developers. Prior to 49.0.0, if an intermediate constrained CA permits the DNS name foo.example.com, and the leaf certificate has a wildcard in its DNS SAN of *.example.com, python-cryptography's verifier accepts which allows escaping outside of the permitted names. The core issue is in DNSConstraint::matches, where a wildcard pattern was treated as matching a more-specific permitted constraint even though *.example.com can expand to sibling names such as bar.example.com outside foo.example.com. This allows acceptance of an invalid certificate chain. This issue is fixed in 49.0.0.3d CVE-2026-675987.4 ALT

5.9%

——2Emlog Pro through 2.6.23 contains a disabled TLS certificate validation vulnerability in include/service/ai.php that allows network-adjacent attackers to intercept outbound HTTPS requests to configured LLM providers by presenting arbitrary TLS certificates, as CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER and CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST are unconditionally disabled across sendStream(), sendImageRequest(), send(), and fetchSearchHtml() with no option to re-enable verification. Attackers can perform man-in-the-middle interception to extract Authorization Bearer API keys from every AI request and inject crafted AI responses that may be acted upon by the tool-call execution pipeline, including the query_database and update_config tool handlers.3d CVE-2025-9291—

7.8%

——2A certification validation weakness exists in communication between affected Omada devices and cloud controllers. Certificate identity verification does not adequately validate that a presented certificate corresponds to the expected cloud controller hostname, which may allow certificate validation protections to be bypassed under specific conditions. Successful exploitation may allow interception or modification of communication between affected devices and cloud controllers.1d