PULSE
FEED
ransomnightspire reclama a REFSA S.A. · AR · Otherransomsilentransomgroup reclama a S... G...ransomqilin reclama a Isapre Consalud · CL · Healthcareransomorova reclama a Harry's International · SG · Retail & E-Commerceransomeverstake reclama a da*****t.com · Technologyransomeverstake reclama a ra*****g.comransomredact reclama a Holland & Knight · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Astino Berhad · MY · Manufacturingransomakira reclama a Princeton Management · Financial Servicesransomakira reclama a Usnextransomakira reclama a Howells Motor Freight · US · Transportationransomsafepay reclama a deom.be · BEransomhyflock reclama a Ateşsan Ambalaj · TR · Manufacturingransompear reclama a Neiman & Company, Inc. · US · Financial Servicesransomnightspire reclama a REFSA S.A. · AR · Otherransomsilentransomgroup reclama a S... G...ransomqilin reclama a Isapre Consalud · CL · Healthcareransomorova reclama a Harry's International · SG · Retail & E-Commerceransomeverstake reclama a da*****t.com · Technologyransomeverstake reclama a ra*****g.comransomredact reclama a Holland & Knight · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Astino Berhad · MY · Manufacturingransomakira reclama a Princeton Management · Financial Servicesransomakira reclama a Usnextransomakira reclama a Howells Motor Freight · US · Transportationransomsafepay reclama a deom.be · BEransomhyflock reclama a Ateşsan Ambalaj · TR · Manufacturingransompear reclama a Neiman & Company, Inc. · US · Financial Services
← Todos los CVEs
CVE Watch2 nov 2026

CVE-2026-45514

In multiple functions of SaveUi.java, there is a possible bypass of package installation requirements due to a logic error in the code. This

CVSS

8.4

Alto

EPSS

—

KEV

—

Exploit Today

—

0-100

Publicado: 2 nov 2026 · Última mod.: 2 nov 2026 · CWE-693

EPSS · 30d

Sin historial EPSS suficiente todavía.

Descripción técnica

In multiple functions of SaveUi.java, there is a possible bypass of package installation requirements due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Referencias oficiales
CVEs relacionados
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-589468.4 ALT
—
———In navigateUpTo of ActivityClientController.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.7h
CVE-2026-589348.4 ALT
—
———In prepareWindowToDisplayDuringRelayout of WindowState.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.7h
CVE-2026-588378.4 ALT
—
———In multiple locations, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.7h
CVE-2026-588367.8 ALT
—
———In handlePackagePostInstall of InstallPackageHelper.java, there is a possible Enhanced Confirmation Mode (ECM) bypass vulnerability that allows a sideloaded application to modify the package source during a self-update due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.7h
CVE-2026-286456.8 MED
—
———In onStrongAuthRequiredChanged of UsbService.java, there is a possible unauthenticated enabling of USB data due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.7h
CVE-2026-87718—
—
——0Apache Wicket 10.10.0, 10.11.0 and 9.24.0 do not set the Content-Security-Policy headers on a page whose render request handler is wrapped in more than one IRequestHandlerDelegate. The framework unwraps only a single delegate level when deciding whether a request renders a page, so with a deeper chain, for example an application-provided delegating request mapper combined with CryptoMapper, the page is served without any CSP header even though CSP is enabled, and no error or warning is raised. The nonce-based protection Wicket applies to inline scripts and styles, together with any other CSP directives configured by the application, is thereby lost for those pages, exposing them to content injection the policy was meant to prevent. Applications on stock Wicket that do not wrap request handlers themselves are not affected. Versions before 10.10.0 and 9.24.0 handled nested delegates correctly. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 10.12.0 or 9.25.0, which fix the issue.12h