CVE-2026-54705
MathLive provides web components for math display and input. Prior to 0.110.0, MathLive fails to escape text-mode content in \text{} and \mb
CVSS
6.3
Medio
EPSS
—
KEV
—
Exploit Today
—
0-100
Publicado: 29 jul 2026 · Última mod.: 29 jul 2026 · CWE-116
Sin historial EPSS suficiente todavía.
MathLive provides web components for math display and input. Prior to 0.110.0, MathLive fails to escape text-mode content in \text{} and \mbox{} commands in Box.toMarkup at src/core/box.ts, in xmlEscape, scanText, and text-mode output in src/formats/atom-to-math-ml.ts, and through convertLatexToMarkup, convertLatexToMathMl, <math-span>, <math-div>, and the default identity MathfieldElement.createHTML, allowing malicious input to run arbitrary JavaScript when rendered. This issue is fixed in version 0.110.0.
- github.comhttps://github.com/arnog/mathlive/commit/5fe1c46153883f9ec0249a5c8c34e64aaae9cfb8
- github.comhttps://github.com/arnog/mathlive/issues/3028
- github.comhttps://github.com/arnog/mathlive/security/advisories/GHSA-fm7p-gw32-828p
- github.comhttps://github.com/arnog/mathlive/security/advisories/GHSA-fm7p-gw32-828p
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-50642——
——0diff‑so‑fancy does not properly sanitize non‑SGR terminal control sequences before outputting diff data. The application only strips ANSI SGR sequences while allowing other control characters, including carriage return (\r) and escape sequences (e.g., OSC, CSI), to pass through unsanitized.
An attacker can embed malicious control sequences in filenames, diff metadata, or file content that are rendered directly in the terminal during diff viewing. This can lead to output manipulation, including filename spoofing, terminal screen clearing, and clipboard injection via supported escape sequences.
Successful exploitation may mislead users during code review, alter terminal state, or result in unintended command execution through clipboard hijacking.
This issue has been fixed in the commit 9c8129422hCVE-2026-59727—23.3%
——7Astro is a web framework for content-driven websites. In versions 3.10.0 through 7.0.3, when a transition:persist, transition:scope, or transition:persist-props directive is applied to a client-hydrated (client:*) component, Astro copied the directive value onto the rendered <astro-island> element without HTML-escaping it. If a developer reflects attacker-controlled input into one of these directives, an attacker can break out of the attribute and inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript into the server-rendered output, resulting in reflected cross-site scripting (XSS). Exploitation requires the application developer to have written a non-idiomatic pattern — passing untrusted, request-derived input directly into a transition directive. Astro applications that do not route untrusted input into these directives are unaffected. This issue has been fixed in version 7.0.4.2dCVE-2026-646475.4 MED40.7%
——12Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. In versions 12.0.0 through 15.5.20 and 16.0.0 through 16.2.10, a server-side fetch with a request body may return a cached response body from a different request to the same URL but different body. Confidential data in the POST's response body would then leak to unauthorized requests. Though the request itself will not be deduped. This is only an issue when receiving request bodies with a content type charset other than UTF-8. For example, the UTF-16 byte sequences for 삃삃 and 섄섄 in the request body would share the same cache. This issue has been fixed in versions 15.5.21 and 16.2.11.21hCVE-2026-55730—28.4%
——9Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (CWE-79) in LWEB802 in Loytec LWEB-802 before 5.0.8 on all platforms allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim's browser and perform actions with the victim's privileges via a crafted link containing a malicious `project` or `mspParams` parameter.3dCVE-2026-12496—28.4%
——9Stored Cross-Site Scripting (CWE-79) in the OPC XML-DA server statistics in Loytec LIP-ME201C, L-INX, L-GATE, L-ROC, L-IOB, L-DALI, L-VIS and L-PAD through 8.4.16 on LINX-A64 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in an administrator's browser (session hijacking, credential theft, device reconfiguration) via a crafted `User-Agent` header in a `POST /da` request.3dCVE-2025-516779.1 CRÍ35.4%
——11An issue was discovered in openRISC OR1200 commit 83ac6b. An output mismatch between the RTL and the netlist of the or1200 cpu output port can lead to unexpected behavior.7d