CVE-2026-55643
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. Prior to 8.6.3, a company-scoped user in FMCS floater mode can access users whose company
CVSS
—
Sin CVSS
EPSS
0.3%
p17
KEV
—
Exploit Today
5
0-100
Publicado: 19 ago 2026 · Última mod.: 19 ago 2026 · CWE-863
0.3%EPSS · 30 días0.3%
2026-08-202026-08-31
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. Prior to 8.6.3, a company-scoped user in FMCS floater mode can access users whose company_id is null because broad API queries and bulk web actions do not consistently apply isCurrentUserHasAccess. The /api/v1/users and /api/v1/users/{id}/licenses endpoints can expose personal data and assigned licenses, /users/bulkeditsave can modify out-of-scope profiles, and /users/merge can soft-delete users and transfer assigned assets. This issue is fixed in version 8.6.3.
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-828796.3 MED—
——0DataEase before 2.10.26 contains multiple access control defects in the sharing link module. Tickets are not bound to the target share UUID, so a valid ticket issued for one share can be reused against another (ShareTicketManage.validateTicket / POST /de2api/share/proxyInfo). The POST /de2api/share/validate endpoint issues a LinkToken after password verification without requiring a ticket, bypassing the 'ticket mandatory' policy. Additionally, the ticket create and delete endpoints (POST /de2api/ticket/saveTicket, POST /de2api/ticket/delTicket) lack share-ownership checks, allowing an authenticated user who knows another user's ticket to modify, rebind, or delete it (denial of service), and GET /de2api/share/queryRelationByUserId/{uid} allows authenticated users to enumerate other users' share mappings.5hCVE-2026-828755.5 MED3.6%
——1ToolJet before v3.16.208 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in TooljetDB controller endpoints that accept organizationId from URL path without verifying it matches the authenticated user's workspace. Authenticated users can enumerate, create, rename, and delete TooljetDB tables in any other workspace by manipulating the organizationId parameter in requests.7hCVE-2026-689515.3 MED26.1%
——8GROWI contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability. If this vulnerability is exploited, an unauthenticated attacker could retrieve the other user's bookmark data.9hCVE-2026-82724—15.7%
——5Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_phoenix invokes the SubdomainHook authorization callback with a nil tenant, so tenant-scoped access checks never see the tenant they are meant to enforce.
AshPhoenix.LiveView.SubdomainHook.on_mount/4 attached a handle_params hook to assign the tenant and then immediately called handle_subdomain in the same on_mount. The tenant assign is only written when LiveView later runs handle_params, strictly after on_mount returns, so handle_subdomain read an unset assign and ran as apply(m, f, [socket, nil | a]). A consumer gate that halts when the user does not belong to the tenant instead evaluated nil, either crashing or taking a permissive branch, and it was never re-run once the real subdomain was assigned or on later navigations. The fix runs handle_subdomain inside the handle_params hook with the real tenant on every navigation.
This issue affects ash_phoenix: from 2.1.26 before 2.3.25.12hCVE-2026-81643—15.7%
——5Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_graphql delivers GraphQL subscription payloads for records a subscriber is not authorized to see.
In AshGraphql.Subscription.Batcher, do_send/5 resolves the first notification of a batch and filters it with should_send?/1, which drops results whose errors are coded forbidden or not_found or carry no code, precisely so that unauthorized results are not disclosed. The remaining notifications in the batch are read from the process dictionary, re-run through the pipeline, and appended to the outgoing results without that filter. They reach pubsub.publish_subscription/2, and the not is_nil(record) guard drops only nil records, not error-carrying results. Any two qualifying notifications arriving within the default one-second batch interval suffice, and batching is the default path. The fix applies should_send?/1 to the whole batch.
This issue affects ash_graphql: from 1.4.0 before 1.11.0.21hCVE-2026-80223—15.7%
——5Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_graphql allows an authenticated subscriber in one tenant to receive another tenant's records over GraphQL subscriptions.
The subscription resolver in AshGraphql.Graphql.Resolver authorizes each notification payload in memory: its fast path calls Ash.can/3 with run_queries?: false, which evaluates the read policy filter against the in-memory record via Ash.Expr.eval/2 and never issues a query. Ash applies multitenancy at query-build and data-layer-prefix time, not inside query.filter, so the evaluated policy carries no tenant condition and a tenant-B notification routed to a tenant-A subscriber is emitted whenever the policy filter is true. The single-notification clause has no tenant guard at all, and the batched clause checks only the head of the notification list, so non-head entries authorize purely in memory. A tenant-scoped read is reached only when filter evaluation fails.
This issue affects ash_graphql: from 1.4.0 before 1.11.0.21h