PULSE
EN VIVO54señales / 24h
FEED
ransomsection9 reclama a ******.net.br · BR · Financial Servicesransomsection9 reclama a ******.com.br · BR · Otherransomsection9 reclama a ********.com.br · BR · Not Foundransomglobal secret group reclama a Prism Telecom · FI · Technologyransomglobal secret group reclama a Cipher Dynamics · IN · Technologyransomglobal secret group reclama a Stratos Network · AE · Technologyransomglobal secret group reclama a OmniLink AG · DE · Technologyransomglobal secret group reclama a Vertex Systems · US · Technologyransomglobal secret group reclama a Nexon Corp. · KR · Technologyransomglobal secret group reclama a Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance · US · Financial Servicesransomglobal secret group reclama a West Sixth Law · US · Professional Servicesransomglobal secret group reclama a Baker Business & Tax Solutions · US · Professional Servicesransomglobal secret group reclama a Carpets Direct · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomglobal secret group reclama a AnyWeather · US · Technologyransomsection9 reclama a ******.net.br · BR · Financial Servicesransomsection9 reclama a ******.com.br · BR · Otherransomsection9 reclama a ********.com.br · BR · Not Foundransomglobal secret group reclama a Prism Telecom · FI · Technologyransomglobal secret group reclama a Cipher Dynamics · IN · Technologyransomglobal secret group reclama a Stratos Network · AE · Technologyransomglobal secret group reclama a OmniLink AG · DE · Technologyransomglobal secret group reclama a Vertex Systems · US · Technologyransomglobal secret group reclama a Nexon Corp. · KR · Technologyransomglobal secret group reclama a Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance · US · Financial Servicesransomglobal secret group reclama a West Sixth Law · US · Professional Servicesransomglobal secret group reclama a Baker Business & Tax Solutions · US · Professional Servicesransomglobal secret group reclama a Carpets Direct · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomglobal secret group reclama a AnyWeather · US · Technology
← Todos los CVEs
CVE Watch23 jul 2026

CVE-2026-60161

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). The supported version that is affected is 7.

CVSS

6.1

Medio

EPSS

0.1%

p2

KEV

Exploit Today

0

0-100

Publicado: 21 jul 2026 · Última mod.: 23 jul 2026 · CWE-362

EPSS · 30d
0.1%EPSS · 30 días0.1%
2026-07-222026-07-25
Descripción técnica

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). The supported version that is affected is 7.2.12. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H).

Referencias oficiales
CVEs relacionados
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-106816.5 MED
0In Zephyr's userspace dynamic-objects subsystem, thread_idx_alloc() in kernel/userspace/userspace.c allocated a new thread permission index from the global _thread_idx_map[] bitmap without holding lists_lock. On SMP systems, two user-mode threads invoking the k_object_alloc(K_OBJ_THREAD) syscall concurrently can both observe the same low free bit, perform the same non-atomic RMW to clear it, and return the identical tidx. The two newly created K_OBJ_THREAD objects are then assigned the same thread_id, so the two user threads alias a single bit position in every kernel object's perms[] bitfield: any subsequent grant of access on a kernel object to one thread is implicitly a grant to the other, defeating userspace ACL isolation. A secondary lost-update window between the unlocked &=~BIT() in alloc and the locked |= BIT() in thread_idx_free() can also leak entries from the thread-index pool. The defect is reachable from any user-mode thread via the unrestricted __syscall k_object_alloc and is gated on CONFIG_USERSPACE, CONFIG_DYNAMIC_OBJECTS, and CONFIG_SMP. The flaw was introduced when the per-thread permission index was added in 2018 and is present in every release up to and including v4.4.0. Fixed by holding lists_lock across the bitmap RMW and the permissions clear (and inlining the obj_list traversal that previously took the lock itself).1d
CVE-2026-610795.8 MED
0.1%
0Vulnerability in Oracle GoldenGate (component: Libraries). Supported versions that are affected are 19.1.0.0.0-19.30.0.0, 21.3-21.21 and 23.4-23.26.2. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle GoldenGate executes to compromise Oracle GoldenGate. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle GoldenGate accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle GoldenGate accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle GoldenGate. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H).2d
CVE-2026-552195.3 MED
4.1%
1Paymenter is a free and open-source webshop solution for management of hosting services. In versions prior to 1.5.5, the credit payment implementation in app/Livewire/Invoices/Show.php executes a pessimistic row lock (lockForUpdate()) outside of an active database transaction. Because MySQL/MariaDB requires an enclosing transaction to enforce row-level locks, the guard is ineffective. Concurrent payment requests can exploit this race condition to read the same credit balance simultaneously, allowing users to pay multiple invoices using the same credit balance. In database systems like MySQL, a row lock only works inside a formal transaction; without one, the lock is completely ignored. Because there is no active lock, two payment requests sent at the exact same millisecond can look at the database at the same time. Both requests see the original credit balance, decide it is sufficient, and approve the payment. Because the payment processes successfully through ExtensionHelper::addPayment(), the application provisions the corresponding services or digital goods, resulting in direct financial or resource loss to the platform. This issue has been fixed in version 1.5.5.3d
CVE-2026-457125.9 MED
10.0%
3Mailpit is an email testing tool and API for developers. Prior to version 1.30.0, the screenshot/print proxy (/proxy?data=…) maintains a package-level assets map[string]MessageAssets cache, but reads the map without holding assetsMutex while a long-running cleanup goroutine and (re-entrant) CSS-rewriting code path concurrently write to it under the lock. When the unsynchronized read coincides with a synchronized write, Go's runtime raises fatal error: concurrent map read and map write — a runtime.throw that is not recoverable by http.Server's handler-panic recover. The whole Mailpit process exits, taking the SMTP, POP3 and HTTP listeners down with it. Version 1.30.0 contains a patch.5d
CVE-2026-637568.1 ALT
19.1%
6SurrealDB versions before 3.1.0 contain a time-of-check/time-of-use race condition in the HTTP /rpc endpoint that allows unauthenticated requests to inherit authenticated session state. Unauthenticated attackers can send concurrent requests to the /rpc endpoint while legitimate authenticated traffic is active to execute operations with hijacked user privileges.4d
CVE-2026-162124.2 MED
8.2%
2A vulnerability was identified in awesto django-shop up to 1.2.4. Affected is an unknown function of the file shop/models/inventory.py of the component Purchase Stock Handler. The manipulation leads to race condition. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.6d