CVE-2026-62585
Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM Administration product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Data Archival). Supported versions that are affecte
CVSS
9.8
Crítico
EPSS
0.4%
p29
KEV
—
Exploit Today
9
0-100
Publicado: 18 ago 2026 · Última mod.: 21 ago 2026 · CWE-284
0.3%EPSS · 30 días0.4%
2026-08-202026-09-17
Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM Administration product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Data Archival). Supported versions that are affected are 25.12-26.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel CRM Administration. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Siebel CRM Administration. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-50610—0.6%
——0A vulnerability has been identified in the Acer System Monitoring component included with NitroSense and PredatorSense due to insufficient access controls in a privileged service. An authenticated local user may be able to access the service and perform unauthorized registry modifications, potentially resulting in local privilege escalation.16hCVE-2026-50609—0.6%
——0A vulnerability has been identified in the Acer System Monitoring component included with NitroSense and PredatorSense. Insufficient access controls within a privileged Named Pipe service may allow an authenticated local user to perform unauthorized registry operations. In certain situations, this could lead to privilege escalation or compromise of the affected system.16hCVE-2026-50605—0.6%
——0A vulnerability has been identified in the Acer Agent Service component included with NitroSense and PredatorSense. Insufficient access controls within a privileged service may allow an authenticated local user to perform unauthorized registry operations. In certain situations, this could lead to privilege escalation or compromise of the affected system.17hCVE-2026-909825.3 MED29.4%
——9@fastify/static is a Fastify plugin that serves static files from a configured root directory. In versions before 10.1.4, on a case-insensitive filesystem such as Windows or the default macOS volume, a route guard or allowedPath restriction can be bypassed by altering the letter case of a path segment. The route matcher is case-sensitive while the filesystem is not, so a request that changes the case of a protected segment does not match the guarded route and falls through to the static handler, yet the filesystem resolves it to the same protected file. As a result, an unauthenticated request can read a file that a route guard or allowedPath was configured to protect. The issue does not affect case-sensitive filesystems and is not a directory traversal, since nothing is served from outside the configured root. The issue is fixed in @fastify/static 10.1.4, which validates the requested path against its actual on-disk spelling and rejects case-aliased paths before authorization. As a workaround, serve static files from a case-sensitive filesystem, or ensure route guards and allowedPath rules account for every letter-case variant of the protected paths.18hCVE-2026-203329.9 CRÍ22.8%
——7As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco Secure Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Software engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities.
The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20332 are related to improper access control issues that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-284.13hCVE-2026-201215.3 MED40.8%
——12A vulnerability in the access control list (ACL) Object Group Search (OGS) implementation of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass configured access controls.
This vulnerability is due to a logic error in populating group access control policies (ACPs) with OGS configured. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending traffic that should be blocked through the device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass access controls and reach devices in protected networks.1d