PULSE
EN VIVO13señales / 24h
FEED
ransomcrpxo reclama a Encore Enterprises, Inc. · US · Otherransomthegentlemen reclama a Philippine Savings Bank · PH · Financial Servicesransomplay reclama a The Butcher Brothers · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomplay reclama a Sigma Plastics Group · US · Manufacturingransomplay reclama a Cambridge Management · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a quantinuum.com · US · Technologyransomglobal secret group reclama a Vernon & Waldrep · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a The Saturday Evening Post · US · Otherransomqilin reclama a Commercial Furniture Interiors · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Dienst Pack Systems · DE · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Ceragres · CA · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Pointe Property Group · US · Otherransomqilin reclama a Schreiner Trockenbau GmbH · AT · Manufacturingransomgammax reclama a MTCO (Mahmoud Altaheni & Partners Trading Co) · SA · Otherransomcrpxo reclama a Encore Enterprises, Inc. · US · Otherransomthegentlemen reclama a Philippine Savings Bank · PH · Financial Servicesransomplay reclama a The Butcher Brothers · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomplay reclama a Sigma Plastics Group · US · Manufacturingransomplay reclama a Cambridge Management · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a quantinuum.com · US · Technologyransomglobal secret group reclama a Vernon & Waldrep · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a The Saturday Evening Post · US · Otherransomqilin reclama a Commercial Furniture Interiors · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Dienst Pack Systems · DE · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Ceragres · CA · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Pointe Property Group · US · Otherransomqilin reclama a Schreiner Trockenbau GmbH · AT · Manufacturingransomgammax reclama a MTCO (Mahmoud Altaheni & Partners Trading Co) · SA · Other
← Todos los CVEs
CVE Watch30 jul 2026

CVE-2026-64192

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Reject BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE creation if BPF LSM is uninitial

CVSS

Sin CVSS

EPSS

0.2%

p6

KEV

Exploit Today

2

0-100

Publicado: 20 jul 2026 · Última mod.: 30 jul 2026

EPSS · 30d
0.1%EPSS · 30 días0.2%
2026-07-212026-07-31
Descripción técnica

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Reject BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE creation if BPF LSM is uninitialized When CONFIG_BPF_LSM=y is set, BPF inode storage maps (BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE) are compiled into the kernel. However, if the BPF LSM is not explicitly enabled at boot time (e.g. omitted from the "lsm=" boot parameter), lsm_prepare() is never executed for the BPF LSM. Consequently, the BPF inode security blob offset (bpf_lsm_blob_sizes.lbs_inode) is never initialized and remains at its default compiled size of 8 bytes instead of being updated to a valid offset past the reserved struct rcu_head (typically 16 bytes or more). When a privileged user creates and updates a BPF_MAP_TYPE_INODE_STORAGE map, bpf_inode() evaluates inode->i_security + 8. This erroneously aliases the struct rcu_head.func callback pointer at the beginning of the inode->i_security blob. During subsequent map element cleanup or inode destruction, writing NULL to owner_storage clears the queued RCU callback pointer. When rcu_do_batch() later executes the queued callback, it attempts an instruction fetch at address 0x0, triggering an immediate kernel panic. Fix this by introducing a global bpf_lsm_initialized boolean flag marked with __ro_after_init. Set this flag to true inside bpf_lsm_init() when the LSM framework successfully registers the BPF LSM. Gate map allocation in inode_storage_map_alloc() on this flag, returning -EOPNOTSUPP if the BPF LSM is in turn uninitialized. This fail-fast approach prevents userspace from allocating inode storage maps when the supporting BPF LSM infrastructure is absent, avoiding zombie map states.

Referencias oficiales
CVEs relacionados

Sin CVEs relacionados por CWE o producto.