PULSE
EN VIVO28señales / 24h
FEED
ransomthegentlemen reclama a Philippine Savings Bank · PH · Financial Servicesransomplay reclama a The Butcher Brothers · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomplay reclama a Sigma Plastics Group · US · Manufacturingransomplay reclama a Cambridge Management · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a quantinuum.com · US · Technologyransomglobal secret group reclama a Vernon & Waldrep · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a The Saturday Evening Post · US · Otherransomqilin reclama a Commercial Furniture Interiors · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Dienst Pack Systems · DE · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Ceragres · CA · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Pointe Property Group · US · Otherransomqilin reclama a Schreiner Trockenbau GmbH · AT · Manufacturingransomgammax reclama a MTCO (Mahmoud Altaheni & Partners Trading Co) · SA · Otherransomgammax reclama a MTCO (Mahmoud Altaheni & Partners Trading Company) · SA · Professional Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Philippine Savings Bank · PH · Financial Servicesransomplay reclama a The Butcher Brothers · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomplay reclama a Sigma Plastics Group · US · Manufacturingransomplay reclama a Cambridge Management · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a quantinuum.com · US · Technologyransomglobal secret group reclama a Vernon & Waldrep · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a The Saturday Evening Post · US · Otherransomqilin reclama a Commercial Furniture Interiors · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Dienst Pack Systems · DE · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Ceragres · CA · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Pointe Property Group · US · Otherransomqilin reclama a Schreiner Trockenbau GmbH · AT · Manufacturingransomgammax reclama a MTCO (Mahmoud Altaheni & Partners Trading Co) · SA · Otherransomgammax reclama a MTCO (Mahmoud Altaheni & Partners Trading Company) · SA · Professional Services
← Todos los CVEs
CVE Watch1 ago 2026

CVE-2026-67325

GitPython before 3.1.51 contains an incomplete command injection blocklist that fails to account for git's long-option prefix abbreviation f

CVSS

8.8

Alto

EPSS

KEV

Exploit Today

0-100

Publicado: 1 ago 2026 · Última mod.: 1 ago 2026 · CWE-78

EPSS · 30d

Sin historial EPSS suficiente todavía.

Descripción técnica

GitPython before 3.1.51 contains an incomplete command injection blocklist that fails to account for git's long-option prefix abbreviation feature. Attackers can bypass the unsafe options guard by using abbreviated option names like upload_p instead of upload_pack, which git resolves to dangerous options and executes arbitrary commands.

Referencias oficiales
CVEs relacionados
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-673249.8 CRÍ
GitPython 3.1.50 fails to recognize joined short-option forms such as -u<value> (the short form of --upload-pack=<value>) when enforcing its default unsafe-option gate. When an application passes attacker-influenced clone options into Repo.clone_from(..., multi_options=..., allow_unsafe_options=False), an attacker can supply -u<helper> to bypass the gate that blocks --upload-pack/-u, causing Git to execute the specified helper command during clone. Fixed in 3.1.51.9h
CVE-2026-6730810.0 CRÍ
Wazuh workflows before 44bf114 contain a shell injection vulnerability in GitHub Actions that allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands by submitting pull requests with crafted VERSION.json files. Attackers can inject shell metacharacters into environment variables that are directly interpolated into run steps, enabling command execution and exfiltration of secrets including GITHUB_TOKEN and AWS credentials on self-hosted runners.9h
CVE-2026-9044
0An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.23h
CVE-2026-175669.9 CRÍ
0pgAdmin 4's Import/Export Data tool builds a psql \copy (...) command line by interpolating a user-supplied SQL query into a Jinja template and passing the rendered line to psql via --command. To stop an attacker from breaking out of the (...) wrapper, create_import_export_job() (route POST /import_export/job/<sid>, gated only by the ordinary, commonly-granted tools_import_export_data permission) validated the query with a hand-written parenthesis-balance checker, _is_query_parens_balanced(). That checker always treated a backslash before a single quote (\') as escaping the quote, i.e. as if standard_conforming_strings were off. PostgreSQL has defaulted standard_conforming_strings to on since 9.1 (2010), the default on every PostgreSQL version pgAdmin 4 currently supports (13-18); under that default psql's own \copy tokenizer treats \ as an ordinary character, so a single quote immediately after it closes the string literal. A query such as SELECT 'a\') TO PROGRAM 'echo pwned' x' was therefore accepted as "balanced" by pgAdmin's checker (which believed the ) was still inside the string), while psql, run through the actual rendered command line, closes the string at that point and treats the following ) as the end of the wrapping \copy (...) subquery, exposing an attacker-chosen TO PROGRAM '<command>' clause that psql executes via popen() -- independent of a subsequent syntax error later on the same line. This is the same class of bug as CVE-2025-12762/CVE-2025-13780 (RCE via psql meta-command/COPY injection during PLAIN-format dump restore), reached through an independently written defense in a different module (Import/Export Data rather than Restore) that had its own, different logic bug (inverted backslash-escape semantics rather than a BOM-defeated regex anchor). The fix rejects any backslash inside a single-quoted string in the query outright, rather than picking one of the two possible psql interpretations. This is intentionally conservative: because the correct interpretation of \ depends on the target server's standard_conforming_strings setting, which the checker cannot reliably know at validation time, refusing the query is safer than guessing. This issue affects pgAdmin 4: from the introduction of _is_query_parens_balanced() before 9.18.17h
CVE-2026-173477.5 ALT
0The MASTER_PASSWORD_HOOK setting, introduced in pgAdmin 4 7.2, lets an administrator configure an external command that returns a per-user encryption key, with %u in the configured string replaced by the current user's name. The previous implementation substituted the username directly into the command string and executed the result with subprocess.Popen(..., shell=True). Because the username can originate from an external authentication source (OAuth/OIDC claims, Kerberos, webserver auth) rather than a value pgAdmin fully controls, a username containing shell metacharacters (';', '$()', backticks, pipes, '&&', newlines) allowed an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands as the pgAdmin service account in any deployment where the configured hook string uses %u. Fix tokenises the trusted, administrator-configured hook string into an argument vector first (using shlex in POSIX-quoting mode, with backslash-escaping disabled so Windows-style paths are not mis-parsed), substitutes the untrusted username into the individual argv elements, and executes with shell=False. The username is therefore always confined to a single argv element; any shell metacharacters it contains are inert. Administrators whose MASTER_PASSWORD_HOOK previously relied on shell features (pipes, redirection, environment-variable expansion, globbing) within the hook string itself must move that logic into the invoked script, since it is no longer interpreted by a shell. This issue affects pgAdmin 4: from 7.2 before 9.17.17h
CVE-2026-168437.2 ALT
0Some Hikvision Wireless Access Points are vulnerable to authenticated command execution due to insufficient input validation. Attackers with valid credentials can exploit this flaw by sending crafted packets containing malicious commands to affected devices, leading to arbitrary command execution.1d