CVE Watch15 jul 2026

CVE-2026-6857

A flaw was found in camel-infinispan. This vulnerability involves unsafe deserialization in the ProtoStream remote aggregation repository. A

CVSS

7.5

Alto

EPSS

0.7%

p48

KEV

—

Exploit Today

0-100

Publicado: 22 abr 2026 · Última mod.: 15 jul 2026 · CWE-502

EPSS · 30d

0.7%EPSS · 30 días0.7%

2026-06-302026-07-17

Descripción técnica

A flaw was found in camel-infinispan. This vulnerability involves unsafe deserialization in the ProtoStream remote aggregation repository. A remote attacker with low privileges could exploit this by sending specially crafted data, leading to arbitrary code execution. This allows the attacker to gain full control over the affected system, impacting its confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Referencias oficiales

CVEs relacionados

CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.

CVE-2021-422379.8 CRÍ

99.9%

KEV—80Sitecore XP Remote Command Execution Vulnerability8d CVE-2026-456598.8 ALT

86.8%

KEV—76Microsoft SharePoint Server Deserialization of Untrusted Data Vulnerability15d CVE-2026-586449.8 CRÍ

70.7%

KEV—71Microsoft SharePoint Deserialization of Untrusted Data Vulnerability18h CVE-2026-125699.8 CRÍ

66.0%

KEV—70PTC Windchill and FlexPLM Improper Input Validation Vulnerability17d CVE-2026-505229.8 CRÍ

97.2%

——29Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.2d CVE-2025-560059.8 CRÍ

96.7%

——29An undocumented and unsafe feature in the PLY (Python Lex-Yacc) library 3.11 allows Remote Code Execution (RCE) via the `picklefile` parameter in the `yacc()` function. This parameter accepts a `.pkl` file that is deserialized with `pickle.load()` without validation. Because `pickle` allows execution of embedded code via `__reduce__()`, an attacker can achieve code execution by passing a malicious pickle file. The parameter is not mentioned in official documentation or the GitHub repository, yet it is active in the PyPI version. This introduces a stealthy backdoor and persistence risk. NOTE: A third-party states that this vulnerability should be rejected because the proof of concept does not demonstrate arbitrary code execution and fails to complete successfully.3d