PULSE
FEED
ransomqilin reclama a fzmb GmbH, Forschungszentrum für Medizintechnik und Biotechnologie · DE · Healthcareransomqilin reclama a Global Holding · Otherransomwhitearmor reclama a AmplifAI (GoDaddy instance) · US · Technologyransomdirewolf reclama a My Cloud Grocer · GB · Retail & E-Commerceransomhyflock reclama a hitech group · US · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Shibata Co., Ltd. · JP · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Meshbesher & Spence · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a BKV Vasúti Jármjavító Kft · HU · Transportationransomqilin reclama a Forum · AT · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Select Community Management · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a CMD Naturkosmetik · DE · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a qc-consult · DE · Professional Servicesransombarracuda reclama a EVINOKS · TR · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Danser · US · Otherransomqilin reclama a fzmb GmbH, Forschungszentrum für Medizintechnik und Biotechnologie · DE · Healthcareransomqilin reclama a Global Holding · Otherransomwhitearmor reclama a AmplifAI (GoDaddy instance) · US · Technologyransomdirewolf reclama a My Cloud Grocer · GB · Retail & E-Commerceransomhyflock reclama a hitech group · US · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Shibata Co., Ltd. · JP · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Meshbesher & Spence · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a BKV Vasúti Jármjavító Kft · HU · Transportationransomqilin reclama a Forum · AT · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Select Community Management · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a CMD Naturkosmetik · DE · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a qc-consult · DE · Professional Servicesransombarracuda reclama a EVINOKS · TR · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Danser · US · Other
← Todos los CVEs
CVE Watch27 ago 2026

CVE-2026-79033

Insufficient control flow management in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social enginee

CVSS

8.8

Alto

EPSS

0.4%

p36

KEV

—

Exploit Today

11

0-100

Publicado: 25 ago 2026 · Última mod.: 27 ago 2026 · CWE-691

EPSS · 30d
0.4%EPSS · 30 días0.4%
2026-10-032026-10-31
Descripción técnica

Insufficient control flow management in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Referencias oficiales
CVEs relacionados
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-1158939.9 CRÍ
62.5%
——19Wasmtime is a runtime for WebAssembly. Prior to 36.0.19, 48.0.7, and 49.0.4, the Cranelift compiler backend on aarch64 can compile a Wasm br_table instruction with more than approximately 256,000 targets so that it has an incorrect conditional branch target. The branch can then jump to arbitrary other code at a user-controlled offset, allowing a user-controlled Wasm module to escape the sandbox on aarch64 engines using the default Cranelift backend. This issue is fixed in versions 36.0.19, 48.0.7, and 49.0.4.3d
CVE-2026-764697.4 ALT
4.1%
——1As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco networking engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening releases that address multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76469 are related to insufficient control flow management issues that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-691.24d
CVE-2026-202768.6 ALT
40.5%
——12As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco IOS XR Software engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening releases that address multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20276 are related to insufficient control flow management issues that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-691.44d
CVE-2025-516757.5 ALT
39.9%
——12An issue was discovered in openRISC OR1200 commit 83ac6b. An inaccurate update of program counter (PC) values when SPR changes can lead to a Denial of Service (DoS).53d
CVE-2026-202718.6 ALT
40.5%
——12As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco IOS XE Software engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in software hardening releases that address multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20271 are related to insufficient control flow management issues that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-691.  9d
CVE-2026-435038.8 ALT
80.6%
——24In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: skbuff: propagate shared-frag marker through frag-transfer helpers Two frag-transfer helpers (__pskb_copy_fclone() and skb_shift()) fail to propagate the SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG bit in skb_shinfo()->flags when moving frags from source to destination. __pskb_copy_fclone() defers the rest of the shinfo metadata to skb_copy_header() after copying frag descriptors, but that helper only carries over gso_{size,segs, type} and never touches skb_shinfo()->flags; skb_shift() moves frag descriptors directly and leaves flags untouched. As a result, the destination skb keeps a reference to the same externally-owned or page-cache-backed pages while reporting skb_has_shared_frag() as false. The mismatch is harmful in any in-place writer that uses skb_has_shared_frag() to decide whether shared pages must be detoured through skb_cow_data(). ESP input is one such writer (esp4.c, esp6.c), and a single nft 'dup to <local>' rule -- or any other nf_dup_ipv4() / xt_TEE caller -- is enough to land a pskb_copy()'d skb in esp_input() with the marker stripped, letting an unprivileged user write into the page cache of a root-owned read-only file via authencesn-ESN stray writes. Set SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG on the destination whenever frag descriptors were actually moved from the source. skb_copy() and skb_copy_expand() share skb_copy_header() too but linearize all paged data into freshly allocated head storage and emerge with nr_frags == 0, so skb_has_shared_frag() returns false on its own; they need no change. The same omission exists in skb_gro_receive() and skb_gro_receive_list(). The former moves the incoming skb's frag descriptors into the accumulator's last sub-skb via two paths (a direct frag-move loop and the head_frag + memcpy path); the latter chains the incoming skb whole onto p's frag_list. Downstream skb_segment() reads only skb_shinfo(p)->flags, and skb_segment_list() reuses each sub-skb's shinfo as the nskb -- both p and lp must carry the marker. The same omission also exists in tcp_clone_payload(), which builds an MTU probe skb by moving frag descriptors from skbs on sk_write_queue into a freshly allocated nskb. The helper falls into the same family and warrants the same fix for consistency; no TCP TX-side in-place writer is currently known to reach a user page through this gap, but a future consumer depending on the marker would regress silently. The same omission exists in skb_segment(): the per-iteration flag merge takes only head_skb's flag, and the inner switch that rebinds frag_skb to list_skb on head_skb-frags exhaustion does not fold the new frag_skb's flag into nskb. Fold frag_skb's flag at both sites so segments drawing frags from frag_list members carry the marker.16d