PULSE
FEED
ransomanubis reclama a Santiam Hospital & Clinics · US · Healthcareransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Lowenstein Sandler LLP · US · Professional Servicesransompear reclama a Cyrious Software · US · Technologyransomwallstreet reclama a Fortrex · US · Manufacturingransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Morrison Foerster · US · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a T... E...ransomsilentransomgroup reclama a S... H...ransomgenesis reclama a A&B Lab · US · Otherransomglobal secret group reclama a The Anglican International School · IL · Educationransompanzer reclama a PQE Group · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a L...ransomrhysida reclama a Noelker and Hull · US · Professional Servicesransompayload reclama a Hauhinco · DE · Manufacturingransompayload reclama a Marbre Design · Manufacturingransomanubis reclama a Santiam Hospital & Clinics · US · Healthcareransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Lowenstein Sandler LLP · US · Professional Servicesransompear reclama a Cyrious Software · US · Technologyransomwallstreet reclama a Fortrex · US · Manufacturingransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Morrison Foerster · US · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a T... E...ransomsilentransomgroup reclama a S... H...ransomgenesis reclama a A&B Lab · US · Otherransomglobal secret group reclama a The Anglican International School · IL · Educationransompanzer reclama a PQE Group · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a L...ransomrhysida reclama a Noelker and Hull · US · Professional Servicesransompayload reclama a Hauhinco · DE · Manufacturingransompayload reclama a Marbre Design · Manufacturing
← Todos los CVEs
CVE Watch28 oct 2026

CVE-2026-87086

Tanium addressed a denial of service vulnerability in Provision.

CVSS

7.5

Alto

EPSS

—

KEV

—

Exploit Today

0

0-100

Publicado: 27 oct 2026 · Última mod.: 28 oct 2026 · CWE-690

EPSS · 30d

Sin historial EPSS suficiente todavía.

Descripción técnica

Tanium addressed a denial of service vulnerability in Provision.

Referencias oficiales
CVEs relacionados
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-764188.6 ALT
—
———A vulnerability in the Remote Access SSL VPN service of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to logic errors when secondary authentication is configured on a tunnel group. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request when connecting to the SSL remote access VPN. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.5h
CVE-2026-829466.5 MED
6.3%
——2SOEM version 2.0.0 and earlier contains a vulnerability where a malicious device can crash the master system. When the software receives an error response, it clears an internal pointer but continues processing. If another message arrives before timeout, the software attempts to use the cleared pointer, causing a crash. An attacker can trigger this with a simple sequence of two messages.3d
CVE-2026-446382.5 BAJ
2.7%
——1libsixel is a SIXEL encoder/decoder implementation derived from kmiya's sixel. From to 1.8.7-r1, a wrong NULL check after an allocation call in sixel_decode_raw and sixel_decode causes a NULL pointer dereference whenever the allocation fails. The check tests the address of the output parameter (always non-NULL) instead of the value the malloc returned. On allocation failure, the function continues and writes through a NULL pointer, crashing the process. This is a denial of service against any caller of these public APIs that hits a low-memory condition. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.7-r2.3d
CVE-2024-230857.5 ALT
44.8%
——13Apfloat v1.10.1 was discovered to contain a NullPointerException via the component org.apfloat.internal.DoubleScramble::scramble(double[], int, int[]). NOTE: this is disputed by multiple third parties who believe there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. The submission may have been based on a tool that is not sufficiently robust for vulnerability identification.112d