PULSE
FEED
ransomnightspire reclama a REFSA S.A. · AR · Otherransomsilentransomgroup reclama a S... G...ransomqilin reclama a Isapre Consalud · CL · Healthcareransomorova reclama a Harry's International · SG · Retail & E-Commerceransomeverstake reclama a da*****t.com · Technologyransomeverstake reclama a ra*****g.comransomredact reclama a Holland & Knight · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Astino Berhad · MY · Manufacturingransomakira reclama a Princeton Management · Financial Servicesransomakira reclama a Usnextransomakira reclama a Howells Motor Freight · US · Transportationransomsafepay reclama a deom.be · BEransomhyflock reclama a Ateşsan Ambalaj · TR · Manufacturingransompear reclama a Neiman & Company, Inc. · US · Financial Servicesransomnightspire reclama a REFSA S.A. · AR · Otherransomsilentransomgroup reclama a S... G...ransomqilin reclama a Isapre Consalud · CL · Healthcareransomorova reclama a Harry's International · SG · Retail & E-Commerceransomeverstake reclama a da*****t.com · Technologyransomeverstake reclama a ra*****g.comransomredact reclama a Holland & Knight · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Astino Berhad · MY · Manufacturingransomakira reclama a Princeton Management · Financial Servicesransomakira reclama a Usnextransomakira reclama a Howells Motor Freight · US · Transportationransomsafepay reclama a deom.be · BEransomhyflock reclama a Ateşsan Ambalaj · TR · Manufacturingransompear reclama a Neiman & Company, Inc. · US · Financial Services
← Todos los CVEs
CVE Watch2 nov 2026

CVE-2026-91899

Dell Alienware Command Center (AWCC), versions prior to 6.14.54.0, contain an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability

CVSS

6.4

Medio

EPSS

—

KEV

—

Exploit Today

—

0-100

Publicado: 2 nov 2026 · Última mod.: 2 nov 2026 · CWE-347

EPSS · 30d

Sin historial EPSS suficiente todavía.

Descripción técnica

Dell Alienware Command Center (AWCC), versions prior to 6.14.54.0, contain an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of Privilege and Arbitrary Code Execution.

Referencias oficiales
CVEs relacionados
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-918988.1 ALT
—
———Dell Alienware Command Center (AWCC), versions prior to 6.14.54.0, contain an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Arbitrary Code Execution and Elevation of Privilege.9h
CVE-2026-1204597.4 ALT
—
———python-jose through 3.5.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to forge JWTs because HMACKey and CryptographyHMACKey accept zero-length HMAC secrets. When an application's HS256/HS384/HS512 verification key resolves to empty, such as an oct JWK with empty k, attackers can forge tokens with arbitrary claims that jwt.decode accepts.10h
CVE-2026-919085.7 MED
—
———Dell OpenManage Enterprise, versions prior to 4.8.0, contains an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution.9h
CVE-2026-919056.4 MED
—
———Dell OpenManage Enterprise, versions prior to 4.8.0, contains an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Filesystem access for attacker.9h
CVE-2026-1175494.2 MED
—
——0@fastify/secure-session is a session plugin for Fastify that stores an encrypted session in a cookie. In versions 7.5.0 through 8.4.1, when the plugin is configured with the signed cookie option, it calls the cookie unsign routine but, when the signature check reports the value as invalid, still passes the original cookie value to the session decoder, so a session whose signature did not validate is decrypted anyway. The practical effect appears when an application supplies the cookie signing secret independently of the session encryption key and rotates only the signing secret to retire existing sessions while keeping the encryption key active, because a holder of an old session cookie can strip the now obsolete signature and keep using the session. The attacker must already possess an unexpired encrypted session cookie and needs neither secret, and cannot forge session data, extend expiry, or survive rotation of the encryption key. The issue is fixed in @fastify/secure-session 8.4.2, which no longer decodes the session when the signed cookie option is set and the signature check fails, and users should upgrade to 8.4.2 or later. As a workaround, rotate the session encryption key rather than relying on rotation of the cookie signing secret alone.12h
CVE-2026-116474—
3.1%
——1The `GITEA_TOKEN` of a Gitea Actions job authenticates as the `gitea-actions` system user, and the `/api/v1/user` email and GPG key endpoints accepted that user, so a job could register an email address and a GPG key on it; without required email confirmation (the default) the address is stored as activated. Commit verification treats a key without a real owner as the instance signing key, so any user who can run a workflow job could make commits signed with their own key show as trusted and signed by the instance in every repository where they appear, including pull requests to repositories the user cannot write to. The impact is limited to the displayed signature status: enforcement such as required signed commits only checks that a signature is verified and is unaffected, and no access is gained. The `/api/v1/user` routes now reject system users.2d