PULSE
FEED
ransomlockbit5 reclama a xspringcapital.com · SG · Financial Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a susannecerda.com · MXransomanubis reclama a Santiam Hospital & Clinics · US · Healthcareransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Lowenstein Sandler LLP · US · Professional Servicesransompear reclama a Cyrious Software · US · Technologyransomwallstreet reclama a Fortrex · US · Manufacturingransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Morrison Foerster · US · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a T... E...ransomsilentransomgroup reclama a S... H...ransomgenesis reclama a A&B Lab · US · Otherransomglobal secret group reclama a The Anglican International School · IL · Educationransompanzer reclama a PQE Group · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a L...ransomrhysida reclama a Noelker and Hull · US · Professional Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a xspringcapital.com · SG · Financial Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a susannecerda.com · MXransomanubis reclama a Santiam Hospital & Clinics · US · Healthcareransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Lowenstein Sandler LLP · US · Professional Servicesransompear reclama a Cyrious Software · US · Technologyransomwallstreet reclama a Fortrex · US · Manufacturingransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Morrison Foerster · US · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a T... E...ransomsilentransomgroup reclama a S... H...ransomgenesis reclama a A&B Lab · US · Otherransomglobal secret group reclama a The Anglican International School · IL · Educationransompanzer reclama a PQE Group · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a L...ransomrhysida reclama a Noelker and Hull · US · Professional Services
← Todos los CVEs
CVE Watch29 oct 2026

CVE-2026-93757

The Wild Apricot Login plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass via SSO Email-Collision Account Binding in all versions u

CVSS

7.5

Alto

EPSS

—

KEV

—

Exploit Today

—

0-100

Publicado: 29 oct 2026 · Última mod.: 29 oct 2026 · CWE-287

EPSS · 30d

Sin historial EPSS suficiente todavía.

Descripción técnica

The Wild Apricot Login plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass via SSO Email-Collision Account Binding in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.18. When no WildApricot contact-ID mapping is found for an incoming SSO login, the plugin falls back to a network-global `get_user_by('email', ...)` lookup in `Module.php` to resolve a WordPress user, then `UserSynchronizer::syncWaContact()` binds and `Controller::login()` issues a session cookie via `wp_set_auth_cookie()` for that resolved user — both guarded only by `is_super_admin()` — without ever requiring proof of ownership of the matched WordPress account such as a password, local account-linking confirmation, inbox verification, or administrator approval. This makes it possible for attackers with custom-level WildApricot membership access to authenticate as an existing WordPress subsite administrator on a path-based Multisite network, obtaining a valid network-global authentication cookie for the victim without their credentials. Exploitation requires that the attacker control a WildApricot contact whose email address matches the target WordPress administrator's email — achievable via a public zero-fee membership application on the connected WildApricot organization — and that they complete the SSO flow on any subsite where Wild Apricot Login is active; because WordPress user identities and authentication cookies are network-global, the cookie issued on that subsite is equally valid on any other subsite where the victim user holds an administrator role.

Referencias oficiales
CVEs relacionados
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-962288.1 ALT
—
———SSL Wireless SMS Notification for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 3.8.1. The public final_login_ajax_action handler resolves a user and issues an authenticated session by matching the wp_sslcare_otp table on only the attacker-supplied phone and cap_data, without verifying the SMS OTP or any server-side single-use state. Because cap_data was chosen by the attacker in the public otp_login_ajax_action step (which stores the row before sending the SMS), the finalize step trivially matches and the user is looked up solely by the sslcare_login_phone meta. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers who know a phone-linked user's number to take over that account.8h
CVE-2026-1095169.8 CRÍ
—
———The Bot for Telegram on WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass leading to Account Takeover in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.0. The `/wp-json/woo-telegram/v1/main/` REST endpoint is registered with `permission_callback => '__return_true'` and performs no Telegram webhook signature verification, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to POST a forged bot update with a `message.chat.id` set to any WordPress login name; `bftow_get_user_system_id()` resolves this attacker-supplied value to the targeted account via `get_user_by('login', $tgId)` with no ownership proof, and writes a login token computed as `md5($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'] . time())` — both inputs are fully attacker-controlled or bounded within seconds using the response's own `Date` header. The resulting token is redeemable at the unauthenticated, capability-check-free, and nonce-less `?action=bftow_create_order&bftow_token=` endpoint, which calls `wp_set_auth_cookie()` unconditionally via `login_user_by_id`, issuing a persistent authenticated session cookie for the targeted account to the attacker. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as any WordPress user, including administrators, given only that user's username.8h
CVE-2026-553696.5 MED
—
———Waline is a comment system with backend support. Prior to version 1.41.1, the login endpoint POST /api/token reads the email field from the request body without checking its type and passes it straight into the MongoDB storage query. When email is not a string (for example a JSON object such as {"$ne": null}), the MongoDB storage adapter's parseWhere silently DROPS the field rather than rejecting the request, producing an empty filter that matches ALL users. The endpoint then verifies the submitted password against the FIRST user returned (user[0]), which in Waline is the first-registered user — the site administrator. This is a PARTIAL authentication bypass, not a full one. The attacker still needs a valid password for that first user; this is not a zero-knowledge bypass and it does not disclose passwords. Its concrete effects are: (1) the email/identifier factor is removed for the administrator account, (2) user enumeration (a non-string email never fails the "no such user" branch), and (3) credential-stuffing amplification — an attacker can test a leaked or weak password against the administrator account without knowing the administrator's email. This issue has been patched in version 1.41.1.20h
CVE-2026-1037798.3 ALT
—
——0Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Authentication vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Protection mechanism bypass.8h
CVE-2026-864009.8 CRÍ
—
——0Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Authentication vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary command execution with root privileges. This is a critical severity vulnerability as it allows an attacker to take complete control of the system. Dell recommends customers to upgrade at the earliest opportunity.22h
CVE-2026-1092364.8 MED
—
——0The Customer Email Verification for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass via a Predictable Email-Verification Token in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.2. This is due to the `authenticate_user_by_email_link()` function — hooked on the `wp` action and triggered by the `cusomer_email_verify` GET parameter — lacking any capability check or nonce verification, while the `secret_code` it validates is generated as `md5(email . time())` and the `verify_otp_nonce` required to trigger token issuance via the `wp_ajax_nopriv_resend_otp` handler is emitted to every front-end visitor through `wp_localize_script`. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as a newly created, verified WooCommerce customer bound to an arbitrary email address — or to flip an existing account's `customer_email_verified` meta to verified — fully bypassing the plugin's core email-verification control. Exploitation requires the `cev_user_log` table to contain a `password` column, which is absent from the fresh-install schema shipped in version 2.8.2 but is present on sites upgraded from an older version where that column was defined.19h