PULSE
FEED
ransomqilin reclama a SEPIVER · MX · Not Foundransomlockbit5 reclama a istanbultrading.com · TR · Retail & E-Commerceransomsilentransomgroup reclama a M... C... · Not Foundransomqilin reclama a United Restaurant Supply · US · Hospitalityransombravox reclama a AMSAM · FR · Not Foundransombravox reclama a Barrow & Grimm · US · Not Foundransomsilentransomgroup reclama a M...r · Not Foundransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Kirkland & Ellis LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomakira reclama a Bethany Press International · Retail & E-Commerceransomakira reclama a Medienwerkstatt · DE · Educationransomakira reclama a Annapath · Not Foundransomrhysida reclama a DR.SCHNELL GmbH & Co. KGaA · DE · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Airtificial · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Bathurst RSL · AU · Hospitalityransomqilin reclama a SEPIVER · MX · Not Foundransomlockbit5 reclama a istanbultrading.com · TR · Retail & E-Commerceransomsilentransomgroup reclama a M... C... · Not Foundransomqilin reclama a United Restaurant Supply · US · Hospitalityransombravox reclama a AMSAM · FR · Not Foundransombravox reclama a Barrow & Grimm · US · Not Foundransomsilentransomgroup reclama a M...r · Not Foundransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Kirkland & Ellis LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomakira reclama a Bethany Press International · Retail & E-Commerceransomakira reclama a Medienwerkstatt · DE · Educationransomakira reclama a Annapath · Not Foundransomrhysida reclama a DR.SCHNELL GmbH & Co. KGaA · DE · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Airtificial · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Bathurst RSL · AU · Hospitality
← Todos los CVEs
CVE Watch19 oct 2026

CVE-2026-98225

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/shrinker: fix bogus set_shrinker_bit() with cgroup.memory=nokmem Wi

CVSS

—

Sin CVSS

EPSS

0.2%

p5

KEV

—

Exploit Today

2

0-100

Publicado: 6 oct 2026 · Última mod.: 19 oct 2026

EPSS · 30d
0.2%EPSS · 30 días0.2%
2026-10-062026-10-21
Descripción técnica

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/shrinker: fix bogus set_shrinker_bit() with cgroup.memory=nokmem With cgroup.memory=nokmem, shrinker_memcg_alloc() bails out early and never allocates an id, so shrinker->id keeps the 0 it got from the kzalloc() in shrinker_alloc(). __list_lru_init() then copies that 0 into lru->shrinker_id, where it looks like a valid bit index. Nothing calls expand_shrinker_info() on nokmem either, so shrinker_nr_max stays 0 and every memcg ends up with an empty map (map_nr_max == 0). deferred_split_folio() hands a real memcg to __list_lru_add() regardless of whether the lru is memcg aware, so the first THP queued in a cgroup does set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid, 0) and trips the bounds check: WARNING: mm/shrinker.c:212 at set_shrinker_bit+0x7d/0x90, CPU#126 Call Trace: <TASK> deferred_split_folio+0x18c/0x220 map_anon_folio_pmd_nopf+0xdd/0x130 map_anon_folio_pmd_pf+0x14/0xb0 do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0x1a1/0x620 __handle_mm_fault+0xea9/0x10d0 handle_mm_fault+0xe5/0x320 do_user_addr_fault+0x1cc/0x870 exc_page_fault+0x81/0x1b0 asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30 </TASK> Harmless, the WARN_ON_ONCE() is what keeps the out of bounds unit[] read from happening, but the id should not look valid in the first place. Clear it before returning. Two other spots could paper over this: drop the id in __list_lru_init() when nokmem turns memcg_aware off, or make deferred_split_folio() pass NULL like list_lru_add_obj() does. Both leave shrinker->id lying around for the next caller, so fix it where the id is handed out.

Referencias oficiales
CVEs relacionados

Sin CVEs relacionados por CWE o producto.