PULSE
FEED
ransompear reclama a Adobe Insurance Brokers, LLC · US · Financial Servicesransomhyflock reclama a gabonmeca.com leak incident · GA · Manufacturingransomhyflock reclama a dangvuongcac · VN · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #103 · PT · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #102 · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #101 · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #100 · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #99 · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a TheHomeMag NorCal · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomclop reclama a LEGAL-RECORDS.US · US · Professional Servicesransomscarlettgroup reclama a nbcuniversal.com · US · Technologyransomn0n reclama a Xylanpicks · US · Not Foundransombravox reclama a GSE-M Technology Sdn. Bhd. · MY · Technologyransomemperador reclama a Bruin Group LLC · US · Otherransompear reclama a Adobe Insurance Brokers, LLC · US · Financial Servicesransomhyflock reclama a gabonmeca.com leak incident · GA · Manufacturingransomhyflock reclama a dangvuongcac · VN · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #103 · PT · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #102 · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #101 · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #100 · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a Company #99 · Not Foundransomn0n reclama a TheHomeMag NorCal · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomclop reclama a LEGAL-RECORDS.US · US · Professional Servicesransomscarlettgroup reclama a nbcuniversal.com · US · Technologyransomn0n reclama a Xylanpicks · US · Not Foundransombravox reclama a GSE-M Technology Sdn. Bhd. · MY · Technologyransomemperador reclama a Bruin Group LLC · US · Other
← Todos los CVEs
CVE Watch19 oct 2026

CVE-2026-98588

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, sockmap: Reject max_entries > INT_MAX in sock_map_alloc sock_map_

CVSS

—

Sin CVSS

EPSS

0.2%

p10

KEV

—

Exploit Today

3

0-100

Publicado: 18 oct 2026 · Última mod.: 19 oct 2026

EPSS · 30d
0.2%EPSS · 30 días0.2%
2026-10-192026-10-20
Descripción técnica

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, sockmap: Reject max_entries > INT_MAX in sock_map_alloc sock_map_alloc() only rejects max_entries == 0 and otherwise allows any u32 value. sock_map_free() then walks the sks[] array with a signed int iterator: int i; for (i = 0; i < stab->map.max_entries; i++) struct sock **psk = &stab->sks[i]; When a SOCKMAP is created with max_entries = 0xffffffff (UINT_MAX), the allocation of 32 GiB can succeed on large-memory hosts. During free the counter reaches 0x80000000, wraps to INT_MIN, is sign-extended by movslq and turned into a ~16 GiB negative offset from stab->sks, pointing far below the allocation. The faulting access is an xchg() write in sock_map_free(). Without KASAN, the same out-of-bounds write can fault on an unmapped vmalloc page or corrupt an unrelated allocation if that vmalloc address is populated. On a KASAN kernel with CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC=y, the shadow check for that address hits an unmapped shadow page and oopses first: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffff521b59c5a00 RIP: 0010:kasan_check_range+0x107/0x190 Call Trace: sock_map_free+0x93/0x190 map_create+0x68d/0xb30 __sys_bpf+0x21e/0x2e70 Vmcore confirmed stab->map.max_entries == 0xffffffff, stab->sks == 0xffffc911ace2d000, and the faulting address sks + (s64)INT_MIN * 8 exactly at 0xffffc90dace2d000. The same buggy path is reached on the normal close()/bpf_map_free_deferred() path whenever such a map is destroyed. sock_map_alloc() used to bound its allocation size through bpf_map_charge_init(), but the bound was dropped when rlimit-based memory accounting was removed. Reject max_entries > INT_MAX at creation time so the signed iterator in sock_map_free() never sees a value that would overflow. Triggered by syzkaller and reproduced on both a 6.6-based KASAN kernel and the upstream v7.3-rc2 kernel.

Referencias oficiales
CVEs relacionados

Sin CVEs relacionados por CWE o producto.