PULSE
FEED
ransomkrybit reclama a cey-tech.com · CY · Technologyransommetaencryptor reclama a Promantra, Inc. · US · Technologyransomincransom reclama a CIMSA LOGISTICS · US · Transportationransomincransom reclama a HELP Foundation · US · Otherransomincransom reclama a gamechangerwm.com · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a raymondjames.com · US · Financial Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Esri South Africa · ZA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a MEGATRANS · AR · Transportationransomthegentlemen reclama a United Pharmacy · SA · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Clancy Systems International · US · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Orennia · SE · Energy & Utilitiesransomthegentlemen reclama a City of Humboldt · CA · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Reso Tech Laurentides · CA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a Darr Equipment · US · Manufacturingransomkrybit reclama a cey-tech.com · CY · Technologyransommetaencryptor reclama a Promantra, Inc. · US · Technologyransomincransom reclama a CIMSA LOGISTICS · US · Transportationransomincransom reclama a HELP Foundation · US · Otherransomincransom reclama a gamechangerwm.com · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a raymondjames.com · US · Financial Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Esri South Africa · ZA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a MEGATRANS · AR · Transportationransomthegentlemen reclama a United Pharmacy · SA · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Clancy Systems International · US · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Orennia · SE · Energy & Utilitiesransomthegentlemen reclama a City of Humboldt · CA · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Reso Tech Laurentides · CA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a Darr Equipment · US · Manufacturing
CVE Watch413,805 en archivo total

Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy

413,805en la vista actual

Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.

En catálogo KEV1,779
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,707

Distribución · última ventana

  • Crítico
    5,620
  • Alto
    22,540
  • Medio
    20,942
  • Bajo
    2,137
Filtros
Filtros

Ventana

Severidad

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades413,801–413,805 · 413,805
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-1201418.8 ALT
—
———Type confusion in PostgreSQL materialized set-returning functions allows a database user to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via returning rows having different dynamic RECORD return types. json_populate_recordset() is one affected function. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.7, 17.12, 16.16, 15.20, and 14.25 are affected.3h
CVE-2026-1201398.8 ALT
—
———Integer wraparound in PostgreSQL in-memory tuple-size calculations allows a database user to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via oversized tuple data. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.7, 17.12, 16.16, 15.20, and 14.25 are affected.3h
CVE-2026-1201508.8 ALT
—
———Use after free in PostgreSQL expanded-record domain checks allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via repeated checks of a domain over a composite type that cause reuse of a dangling memory-context pointer. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.7, 17.12, 16.16, 15.20, and 14.25 are affected.3h
CVE-2026-1269956.3 MED
—
———A vulnerability was found in tjake Jlama up to 0.8.4/0.9.0-beta. Affected by this vulnerability is the function SafeTensorIndex.loadWeights of the file jlama-core/src/main/java/com/github/tjake/jlama/safetensors/SafeTensorIndex.java. Performing a manipulation of the argument weight_map results in path traversal. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.4h
CVE-2026-124628—
—
———In affected versions of Octopus Server, incorrect validation of changes a user made to their own LDAP identity allowed them to edit that identity even when an Administrator had disabled self-service identity editing. This could result in the user gaining membership of teams mapped to external LDAP groups they do not belong to, and potentially escalating to full administrative privileges if any of those teams are privileged.4h