PULSE
FEED
ransompear reclama a Five Star Jewelers · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomdragonforce reclama a lyserp.com · Technologyransomdoommageddon reclama a A***** T******ransomrhysida reclama a INTI International University & Colleges · MY · Educationransomn0n reclama a Minutes Quick Services · AE · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Susman Godfrey LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomglobal secret group reclama a TDS Telecommunications LLC. · US · Energy & Utilitiesransomshiba reclama a IT Foods Industries · Agriculture and Food Productionransomshiba reclama a Friendly Senior Living · Healthcareransomshiba reclama a Morgan White Group · Professional Servicesransomshiba reclama a Antwerp House Dentistry · GB · Healthcareransomeverstake reclama a as*****g.comransomeverstake reclama a ca*****s.comransomeverstake reclama a in*****s.comransompear reclama a Five Star Jewelers · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomdragonforce reclama a lyserp.com · Technologyransomdoommageddon reclama a A***** T******ransomrhysida reclama a INTI International University & Colleges · MY · Educationransomn0n reclama a Minutes Quick Services · AE · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Susman Godfrey LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomglobal secret group reclama a TDS Telecommunications LLC. · US · Energy & Utilitiesransomshiba reclama a IT Foods Industries · Agriculture and Food Productionransomshiba reclama a Friendly Senior Living · Healthcareransomshiba reclama a Morgan White Group · Professional Servicesransomshiba reclama a Antwerp House Dentistry · GB · Healthcareransomeverstake reclama a as*****g.comransomeverstake reclama a ca*****s.comransomeverstake reclama a in*****s.com
CVE Watch405,617 en archivo total

Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy

405,617en la vista actual

Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.

En catálogo KEV1,764
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,697

Distribución · última ventana

  • Crítico
    5,582
  • Alto
    21,622
  • Medio
    20,013
  • Bajo
    2,108
Filtros
Filtros

Ventana

Severidad

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades8,041–8,080 · 405,617
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2023-2554—
98.2%
——29——
CVE-2014-1201—
98.2%
——29——
CVE-2017-11517—
98.2%
——29——
CVE-2018-3252—
98.2%
——29——
CVE-2012-2175—
98.2%
——29——
CVE-2021-39172—
98.2%
——29——
CVE-2024-11653—
98.2%
——29——
CVE-2008-2254—
98.2%
——29——
CVE-2017-0042—
98.2%
——29——
CVE-2015-0208—
98.2%
——29——
CVE-2013-6720—
98.2%
——29——
CVE-2024-11658—
98.2%
——29——
CVE-2016-7052—
98.2%
——29——
CVE-2010-2742—
98.2%
——29——
CVE-2008-0533—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2007-4954—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2009-0520—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2009-0549—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2024-11655—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2015-0008—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2009-0100—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2009-1545—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2023-31222—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2012-4914—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2022-44507.5 ALT
98.1%
——29The function PEM_read_bio_ex() reads a PEM file from a BIO and parses and decodes the "name" (e.g. "CERTIFICATE"), any header data and the payload data. If the function succeeds then the "name_out", "header" and "data" arguments are populated with pointers to buffers containing the relevant decoded data. The caller is responsible for freeing those buffers. It is possible to construct a PEM file that results in 0 bytes of payload data. In this case PEM_read_bio_ex() will return a failure code but will populate the header argument with a pointer to a buffer that has already been freed. If the caller also frees this buffer then a double free will occur. This will most likely lead to a crash. This could be exploited by an attacker who has the ability to supply malicious PEM files for parsing to achieve a denial of service attack. The functions PEM_read_bio() and PEM_read() are simple wrappers around PEM_read_bio_ex() and therefore these functions are also directly affected. These functions are also called indirectly by a number of other OpenSSL functions including PEM_X509_INFO_read_bio_ex() and SSL_CTX_use_serverinfo_file() which are also vulnerable. Some OpenSSL internal uses of these functions are not vulnerable because the caller does not free the header argument if PEM_read_bio_ex() returns a failure code. These locations include the PEM_read_bio_TYPE() functions as well as the decoders introduced in OpenSSL 3.0. The OpenSSL asn1parse command line application is also impacted by this issue.16d
CVE-2017-0106—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2007-1214—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2024-43044—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2018-12692—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-1999-0738—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2018-12636—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2013-3238—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2016-6897—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2006-1540—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2023-0084—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2022-31161—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2020-6116—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2025-32011—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2024-39614—
98.1%
——29——
CVE-2004-1782—
98.1%
——29——