Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy
405,875en la vista actual
Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.
En catálogo KEV1,764
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,697
Distribución · última ventana
- Crítico5,607
- Alto21,858
- Medio20,359
- Bajo2,116
Filtros
Ventana
Severidad
Filtros
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2012-0014—98.1%
——29——CVE-2009-0689—98.1%
——29——CVE-2016-0191—98.1%
——29——CVE-2018-15957—98.1%
——29——CVE-2009-0223—98.1%
——29——CVE-2013-3175—98.1%
——29——CVE-2010-4741—98.1%
——29——CVE-2024-27781—98.1%
——29——CVE-2006-1236—98.1%
——29——CVE-2011-1276—98.1%
——29——CVE-2023-527559.8 CRÍ98.1%
——29In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: fix slab out of bounds write in smb_inherit_dacl()
slab out-of-bounds write is caused by that offsets is bigger than pntsd
allocation size. This patch add the check to validate 3 offsets using
allocation size.87dCVE-2009-0560—98.1%
——29——CVE-2020-10931—98.1%
——29——CVE-2019-8982—98.1%
——29——CVE-2024-64097.0 ALT98.1%
——29A race condition vulnerability was discovered in how signals are handled by OpenSSH's server (sshd). If a remote attacker does not authenticate within a set time period, then sshd's SIGALRM handler is called asynchronously. However, this signal handler calls various functions that are not async-signal-safe, for example, syslog(). As a consequence of a successful attack, in the worst case scenario, an attacker may be able to perform a remote code execution (RCE) as an unprivileged user running the sshd server.16dCVE-2013-0020—98.1%
——29——CVE-2003-1566—98.1%
——29——CVE-2011-1347—98.1%
——29——CVE-2025-53772—98.1%
——29——CVE-2013-0006—98.1%
——29——CVE-2016-7228—98.1%
——29——CVE-2013-6934—98.1%
——29——CVE-2020-6551—98.1%
——29——CVE-2007-3550—98.1%
——29——CVE-2016-8519—98.1%
——29——CVE-2013-3686—98.1%
——29——CVE-2021-33730—98.1%
——29——CVE-2017-8686—98.1%
——29——CVE-2018-12766—98.1%
——29——CVE-2011-1982—98.1%
——29——CVE-2025-13447—98.0%
——29——CVE-2017-11389—98.1%
——29——CVE-2006-4702—98.1%
——29——CVE-2008-4266—98.1%
——29——CVE-2010-2557—98.1%
——29——CVE-2008-4830—98.1%
——29——CVE-2017-3823—98.1%
——29——CVE-2012-2551—98.1%
——29——CVE-2001-1325—98.1%
——29——CVE-2024-49368—98.1%
——29——