PULSE
FEED
ransomscarlettgroup reclama a spencers.com · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomincransom reclama a chicagolawyer.com · US · Professional Servicesransomeverstake reclama a sp*****g.comransomsilentransomgroup reclama a ArentFox Schiff · US · Professional Servicesransomemperador reclama a Studio Stelitano e Associati · IT · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Acclaim Companies / JCJ Investment · US · Financial Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Gilliam & Associates, P.C · US · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Facts N Figures · US · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Illinois Work Injury Resource Center (IWIRC) · US · Healthcareransomgenesis reclama a Psychometrics Canada · CA · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Louisiana Crane & Construction · US · Manufacturingransomgenesis reclama a Aliqout Association · USransomgenesis reclama a EAS Engineering · US · Manufacturingransomgenesis reclama a Fred H Beck & Associates · US · Professional Servicesransomscarlettgroup reclama a spencers.com · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomincransom reclama a chicagolawyer.com · US · Professional Servicesransomeverstake reclama a sp*****g.comransomsilentransomgroup reclama a ArentFox Schiff · US · Professional Servicesransomemperador reclama a Studio Stelitano e Associati · IT · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Acclaim Companies / JCJ Investment · US · Financial Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Gilliam & Associates, P.C · US · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Facts N Figures · US · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Illinois Work Injury Resource Center (IWIRC) · US · Healthcareransomgenesis reclama a Psychometrics Canada · CA · Professional Servicesransomgenesis reclama a Louisiana Crane & Construction · US · Manufacturingransomgenesis reclama a Aliqout Association · USransomgenesis reclama a EAS Engineering · US · Manufacturingransomgenesis reclama a Fred H Beck & Associates · US · Professional Services
CVE Watch406,106 en archivo total

Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy

406,106en la vista actual

Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.

En catálogo KEV1,764
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,697

Distribución · última ventana

  • Crítico
    5,625
  • Alto
    21,850
  • Medio
    20,388
  • Bajo
    2,120
Filtros
Filtros

Ventana

Severidad

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades9,161–9,200 · 406,106
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2009-3560—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2010-0487—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2025-379249.8 CRÍ
97.9%
——29In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: fix use-after-free in kerberos authentication Setting sess->user = NULL was introduced to fix the dangling pointer created by ksmbd_free_user. However, it is possible another thread could be operating on the session and make use of sess->user after it has been passed to ksmbd_free_user but before sess->user is set to NULL.15d
CVE-2007-2795—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2018-8147—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2024-8132—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2022-42979—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2024-21899—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2020-175277.5 ALT
97.9%
——29While investigating bug 64830 it was discovered that Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M9, 9.0.0-M1 to 9.0.39 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.59 could re-use an HTTP request header value from the previous stream received on an HTTP/2 connection for the request associated with the subsequent stream. While this would most likely lead to an error and the closure of the HTTP/2 connection, it is possible that information could leak between requests.22d
CVE-2018-8148—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2002-1700—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2006-0032—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2011-1910—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2017-18370—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2016-3645—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2014-1797—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2012-2522—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2018-12617—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2015-2790—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2018-4982—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2005-3357—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2010-2560—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2006-3427—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2018-0805—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2008-2248—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2014-1779—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2019-12525—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2012-0184—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2018-18949—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2005-0054—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2022-36309—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2008-4020—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2004-0110—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2016-2851—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2014-1800—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2021-30721—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2012-4786—
97.9%
——29——
CVE-2019-18922—
97.8%
——29——
CVE-2010-3336—
97.8%
——29——
CVE-2020-11943—
97.8%
——29——