Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy
406,443en la vista actual
Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.
En catálogo KEV1,766
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,698
Distribución · última ventana
- Crítico5,571
- Alto21,547
- Medio20,115
- Bajo2,096
Filtros
Ventana
Severidad
Filtros
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2017-8990—96.7%
——29——CVE-2006-2022—96.7%
——29——CVE-2002-1235—96.7%
——29——CVE-2014-4111—96.7%
——29——CVE-2025-9424—96.7%
——29——CVE-2010-4645—96.7%
——29——CVE-2010-1533—96.7%
——29——CVE-2021-28918—96.7%
——29——CVE-2014-4108—96.7%
——29——CVE-2019-1019—96.7%
——29——CVE-2006-00339.3 SIN96.7%
——29Unspecified vulnerability in Microsoft Office 2003 SP1 and SP2, Office XP SP3, Office 2000 SP3, and other products, allows user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PNG image that triggers memory corruption when it is parsed.40dCVE-2018-15127—96.7%
——29——CVE-2021-229267.5 ALT96.7%
——29libcurl-using applications can ask for a specific client certificate to be used in a transfer. This is done with the `CURLOPT_SSLCERT` option (`--cert` with the command line tool).When libcurl is built to use the macOS native TLS library Secure Transport, an application can ask for the client certificate by name or with a file name - using the same option. If the name exists as a file, it will be used instead of by name.If the appliction runs with a current working directory that is writable by other users (like `/tmp`), a malicious user can create a file name with the same name as the app wants to use by name, and thereby trick the application to use the file based cert instead of the one referred to by name making libcurl send the wrong client certificate in the TLS connection handshake.19dCVE-2014-7858—96.7%
——29——CVE-2018-7074—96.7%
——29——CVE-2021-40378—96.7%
——29——CVE-2010-3151—96.7%
——29——CVE-2017-8644—96.7%
——29——CVE-2024-353978.8 ALT96.7%
——29TOTOLINK CP900L v4.1.5cu.798_B20221228 weas discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability in the NTPSyncWithHost function via the hostTime parameter. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted request.117dCVE-2021-27156—96.7%
——29——CVE-2010-1098—96.7%
——29——CVE-2015-2780—96.7%
——29——CVE-2018-1301—96.7%
——29——CVE-2019-8024—96.7%
——29——CVE-2005-0399—96.7%
——29——CVE-2019-7109—96.7%
——29——CVE-2022-0437—96.7%
——29——CVE-2002-0163—96.7%
——29——CVE-2025-6463—96.7%
——29——CVE-2000-0330—96.7%
——29——CVE-2020-18568—96.7%
——29——CVE-2008-2950—96.7%
——29——CVE-2026-94416.3 MED96.7%
——29A security flaw has been discovered in Edimax BR-6478AC 1.23. Affected by this issue is the function formiNICbasic of the file /goform/formiNICbasic of the component POST Request Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument rootAPmac results in command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.102dCVE-2015-1739—96.7%
——29——CVE-2014-2799—96.7%
——29——CVE-2024-13985—96.7%
——29A command injection vulnerability in Dahua EIMS versions prior to 2240008 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the capture_handle.action interface. The flaw stems from improper input validation in the captureCommand parameter, which is processed without sanitization or authentication. By sending crafted HTTP requests, attackers can inject OS-level commands that are executed on the server, leading to full system compromise. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2024-04-06 UTC.37dCVE-2014-3478—96.7%
——29——CVE-2002-0723—96.7%
——29——CVE-2022-36971—96.7%
——29——CVE-2000-0849—96.7%
——29——