Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy
406,443en la vista actual
Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.
En catálogo KEV1,766
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,698
Distribución · última ventana
- Crítico5,571
- Alto21,547
- Medio20,115
- Bajo2,096
Filtros
Ventana
Severidad
Filtros
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2005-0399—96.7%
——29——CVE-2012-4409—96.7%
——29——CVE-2010-3140—96.7%
——29——CVE-2022-26233—96.7%
——29——CVE-2003-0189—96.7%
——29——CVE-2000-08177.5 SIN96.7%
——29Buffer overflow in the HTTP protocol parser for Microsoft Network Monitor (Netmon) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via malformed data, aka the "Netmon Protocol Parsing" vulnerability.40dCVE-2006-5172—96.7%
——29——CVE-2019-8024—96.7%
——29——CVE-2016-7243—96.7%
——29——CVE-2021-32804—96.7%
——29——CVE-2001-0339—96.7%
——29——CVE-2011-3310—96.7%
——29——CVE-2008-3795—96.7%
——29——CVE-2025-9424—96.7%
——29——CVE-2018-4898—96.7%
——29——CVE-2008-1878—96.7%
——29——CVE-2010-4645—96.7%
——29——CVE-2015-1748—96.7%
——29——CVE-2024-10392—96.7%
——29——CVE-2012-6422—96.7%
——29——CVE-2024-35517—96.7%
——29——CVE-2014-7858—96.7%
——29——CVE-2026-17176—96.7%
——29An OS
command injection vulnerability in the TDDP module of Deco BE11000 and Deco M9 Plus allows an
adjacent network attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges by
sending a crafted UDP packet.
Successful exploitation may lead to complete
device compromise, including unauthorized command execution, modification of
device settings, and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability32dCVE-2021-40978—96.7%
——29——CVE-2014-4110—96.7%
——29——CVE-2016-5228—96.7%
——29——CVE-2002-1235—96.7%
——29——CVE-2021-229267.5 ALT96.7%
——29libcurl-using applications can ask for a specific client certificate to be used in a transfer. This is done with the `CURLOPT_SSLCERT` option (`--cert` with the command line tool).When libcurl is built to use the macOS native TLS library Secure Transport, an application can ask for the client certificate by name or with a file name - using the same option. If the name exists as a file, it will be used instead of by name.If the appliction runs with a current working directory that is writable by other users (like `/tmp`), a malicious user can create a file name with the same name as the app wants to use by name, and thereby trick the application to use the file based cert instead of the one referred to by name making libcurl send the wrong client certificate in the TLS connection handshake.19dCVE-2018-4915—96.7%
——29——CVE-2004-2262—96.7%
——29——CVE-2020-4212—96.7%
——29——CVE-2009-4074—96.7%
——29——CVE-2017-13861—96.7%
——29——CVE-2010-3055—96.7%
——29——CVE-2018-8292—96.7%
——29——CVE-2018-5380—96.7%
——29——CVE-2016-5003—96.7%
——29——CVE-2004-1308—96.7%
——29——CVE-2013-7102—96.7%
——29——CVE-2002-1718—96.7%
——29——